search

Active clinical trials for "Malocclusion, Angle Class II"

Results 61-70 of 88

Fixed Lingual Mandibular Growth Modificator

Class II Division 1 MalocclusionRetrognathic Mandible

The current trial was designed to investigate the possible initial net skeletal and dental effects of treatment with FLMGM by a comparative evaluation of treated and untreated Cl II/1 malocclusion subjects. The null hypothesis stated that there were no significant differences in dentofacial changes between FLMGM group and control group.

Completed5 enrollment criteria

Evaluation of Mini Plates Anchorage With Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device

MalocclusionAngle Class II1 more

The purpose of this study is to determine if the Forsus Fatigue resistant Device appliance with direct skeletal mini plates anchorage is capable of achievement of skeletal mandibular effects while preventing the excessive proclination of the lower incisors at the end of the treatment when compared to the conventional Forsus Fatigue resistant Device appliance applied to the upper and lower dental arches in female patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion

Completed11 enrollment criteria

Evaluation of the Effect of Electrical Stimulation on the Rate of Orthodontic Tooth Movement and...

Class II Malocclusion

Thirty-eight patients requiring extraction of maxillary first premolars and maximum anchorage to retract the upper anterior teeth will participate in the study. They will be divided randomly into two groups: electrical group and control group. In each group, en-masse retraction will be initiated after completion of the leveling and alignment phase via closed nickel-titanium coil springs applying 250 g of force per side, Mini-implants will be used as an anchor unit. The dental changes will be detected using dental casts and to evaluate the rate of teeth retraction.

Completed22 enrollment criteria

Which is Better Piezosurgery or LLLT in Accelerating Orthodontic Tooth Movement

Class II Malocclusion

Sixty patients need extraction-based treatment of the maxillary first premolars with subsequent retraction of the maxillary canines will be divided randomly into three groups: piezocision group, low-level laser therapy group, and control group. In each group, the canine retraction will be started after completion of the leveling and alignment phase via closed nickel-titanium coil springs applying 150 g of force per side. For anchorage, a soldered trans-palatal arch will be used. Pre- and post distalization dental casts will be assessed to study the rate of canine retraction, as well as, canine rotation and anchorage loss over a follow-up period until a class I canine relationship is achieved.

Completed22 enrollment criteria

Treatment Effects of Herbst Appliance in Skeletal Class II Cases During Prepubertal and Postpubertal...

Class II MalocclusionDivision 1

The study was directed to compare the treatment outcomes of subjects with Class II malocclusion who were treated with Herbst appliance before and after puberty.

Completed8 enrollment criteria

Clinical Effects of Electrical Stimulation on Speeding up Orthodontic Tooth Movement

Class II Malocclusion

Thirty two patients requiring extraction of maxillary first premolars and en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth will participate in the study. They will be divided randomly into two groups: electrical group and control group. In each group, en-masse retraction will be initiated after completion of the leveling and alignment phase via closed nickel-titanium coil springs applying 250 g of force per side, Mini-implants will be used as an anchor unit. The overall retraction duration will be calculated. The skeletal, dental and soft tissue changes will be detected using panoramic and lateral cephalometric radiographs which will be obtained pretreatment, pre and post en-masse retraction of the anterior teeth.

Completed22 enrollment criteria

Dentoskeletal Changes Associated With Herbst Appliance Therapy

MalocclusionAngle Class II

The aim of the study is to perform a three-dimensional (3D) evaluation of the dentoskeletal changes in pubertal Class II malocclusion subjects treated with the Herbst appliance (HAG), in comparison with a Class II comparison group (CG). 3D virtual models generated from three time-point CBCTs (T0, baseline; T1, immediately after Herbst insertion; and T2, 8 months after) of 25 HAG patients will be evaluated. Virtual models obtained from 25 Class II malocclusion patients, in the same stage of biologic maturation and skeletal abnormality, but with no orthopedic treatment will be constructed for the CG subjects. These CG patients are under orthodontic treatment, but only with teeth alignment. Voxel based registration on the anterior cranial fossa will be used to assess maxillary and mandibular displacement/articular fossa remodeling; regional registration on the mandibular corpus will be performed to evaluate mandibular growth and mandibular dental changes; and regional registration on the anterior region of the maxilla will be performed to evaluate maxillary growth and maxillary dental changes.

Completed7 enrollment criteria

Which is Better Piezosurgery or Piezosurgery With Laser in Accelerating Orthodontic Tooth Movement...

Angle Class II

Sixty patients who need extraction-based treatment of the maxillary first premolars with subsequent retraction of the maxillary anterior teeth will be divided randomly into three groups: piezocision group, piezocision with low-level laser therapy group, and control group. In each group, after the levelling and alignment phase is completed, the rectangular stainless steel archwires (0.019" × 0.025") will be inserted, then after two weeks, the en masse retraction will be started via closed nickel-titanium coil springs applying 250 g of force per side. For anchorage, mini implants will be inserted between the second premolars and the first molar on each side.

Completed22 enrollment criteria

Predictors Associated With Seeking Orthodontic Treatment, Compliance and Treatment Success

MalocclusionAngle Class II

Aim: to search for reasons for seeking orthodontic treatment, compliance during orthodontic treatment, drop-out from orthodontic treatment and success of orthodontic treatment. Methods: evaluation before, during and at the end of orthodontic treatment. Clinical and diagnostic evaluation of complexity before and at the end of orthodontic treatment, evaluation of awareness of treatment need, impact on social and psychological aspects, functional disturbances, impact of malocclusion on quality of life, social interaction, ability to perform daily activities.

Completed2 enrollment criteria

Comparison Between Two Methods in the Acceleration of the Retraction of Upper Canines

MalocclusionAngle Class II1 more

Patients at the Orthodontic Department of University of Damascus Dental School will be examined and subjects who meet the inclusion criteria will be included. Then, initial diagnostic records (diagnostic gypsum models, internal and external oral photographs, as well as radiographic images) will be studied to ensure that the selection criteria are accurately matched. The aim of this study is to compare flapless bone cutting by mechanical drills to evaluate the acceleration of the retraction of upper canines versus traditional bone cutting by piezo-surgery in comparison with a control group without bone cutting after extraction of upper first premolars in class II type I patients.

Completed18 enrollment criteria
1...6789

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs