Active clinical trials for "Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries"

A lot of patient have posterior knee pain after ACL reconstruction despite saphenous nerve block. Recently a new block has been described, know as IPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee). The objective of this randomized controlled double-blinded trial is to assess whether a combined saphenous nerve block with IPACK block is more effective for the postoperative pain than a local infiltration analgesia.

The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy of Vancomycin versus Gentamycin , in reducing infection rates following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction .

Although current rehabilitation protocols following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are based on the graft remodeling process, there is uncertainty about its time schedule. Moreover, there are individual differences in neuromotor learning and flexibility after ACLR. This study was conducted to investigate the effect of a criterion-based rehabilitation protocol on pain intensity, effusion, and knee function in amateur athletes following ACLR. Although current rehabilitation protocols following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are based on the graft remodeling process, there is uncertainty about its time schedule. Moreover, there are individual differences in neuromotor learning and flexibility after ACLR. This study was conducted to investigate the effect of a criterion-based rehabilitation protocol on pain intensity, effusion, and knee function in amateur athletes following ACLR.

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of a femoral nerve block vs. an adductor canal block on pain and quadriceps muscle strength for knee arthroscopy surgery.

Compare of the effectiveness of the use of ropivacaine and midazolam by intraarticular vs epidural administration on post-operative analgesia after isolated arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstring autograft.

The purpose of this randomized study is to compare clinical and functional outcomes of both surgery techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (using quadriceps tendon versus hamstring tendon) after reconstruction in athletes.

The purpose of this double-blind, randomized clinical trial to compare outcomes of single-bundle (SB) to anatomic double-bundle (DB) ACL reconstruction. We hypothesize that anatomically reconstructing both bundles of the ACL will lead to better restoration of healthy knee mechanics and clinical outcomes. In addition to standard clinical outcome measures, we will utilize a unique combination of high-speed biplane radiography (for highly accurate assessment of knee kinematics) and 3D imaging (MRI and CT, to define joint and cartilage morphology) to characterize joint kinematics and cartilage surface interactions during functional tasks. The specific aims of this study are to: Specific Aim 1: Determine if anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction restores normal dynamic knee function better than single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Hypothesis 1.1 Knee kinematics after anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction are more similar to the uninjured contra-lateral limb than after single-bundle ACL reconstruction, as measured with dynamic stereoradiography 6 and 24 months after surgery. Hypothesis 1.2 Graft elongation from 6 to 24 months after surgery is reduced with anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction in comparison to single-bundle ACL reconstruction, as measured with dynamic stereoradiography. Specific Aim 2: Determine if anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction results in better clinical outcomes than single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Hypothesis 2.1 Anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction will result in more symmetrical laxity and better range of motion and hop test scores in comparison to single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Hypothesis 2.2 In comparison to single-bundle ACL reconstruction, anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction will result in better patient-oriented outcomes, indicating fewer symptoms, a higher level of activity and more complete return to sport. Successful completion of these aims will provide quantitative evidence of the efficacy of anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction for restoring normal knee mechanics. Should the results show a clear benefit for this procedure, it would provide support for wider adaptation of anatomic DB reconstruction. By completing the proposed aims, we will also establish a sound basis for additional studies with longer follow-up (including the subjects in this cohort), to assess the benefits of anatomic DB ACL reconstruction for improving long-term clinical outcomes and maintaining joint and cartilage health.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate safety and preliminary efficacy of MSB-CAR001 in subjects who have recently undergone an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

To our knowledge, no studies have compared a virtual psychological intervention (VPI) to standard care in a randomized control trial format. We believe virtual administration of psychological CBT modules will be an accessible and convenient vehicle to improve ACLR outcomes. The purpose of our study is to apply and assess the outcomes of ACLR patients after undergoing VPI in comparison to a control cohort. We hypothesize that ACLR patients in the VPI cohort will have improved return to sport and post operative outcomes compared to controls. This study is a parallel arm prospective randomized-controlled trial. The expected duration of the study is two years. Trial eligibility criteria are as follows: patients over the age of 12 undergoing first time ACLR with a HFH Sports Orthopedic surgeon.An asynchronous course of pre- and post-operative CBT modules (VPI) will be delivered to patients in Group A as an adjuvant treatment to standard-of-care rehabilitation. Each session is designed to provide patients with different CBT strategies to augment their recovery. Sessions will be delivered virtually by trained health professionals. Participants in Group B will receive standard-of-care rehabilitation only. Outcomes measured willl include return to sport at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months, PROMIS scores, PHQ-2 scores, ACL-RSI scores, post-op opioid usage.

This research study is the first of its kind and will allow health care professionals and researchers to answer many questions about the reasons why anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury leads to knee pain and disability and osteoarthritis. We also hope that this study will be the beginning of new, more powerful and safer drugs to help patients with ACL injuries heal sooner and return to sports or daily activities pain free. Study participants will be recruited from the University of Kentucky and Vanderbilt University. The purpose of this research is to gather information on how safe and effective Kenalog® is in alleviating knee pain following ACL rupture.