Active clinical trials for "Anxiety Disorders"

This is a three-year follow up of a previously completed randomized clinical trial (RCT) of a transdiagnostic cognitive and behavioral (CBT) program ("Mind My Mind" [MMM]) compared to management as usual (MAU) in youth with emotional and behavioral problems. The effectiveness trial (Clinical Trials Identifier: NCT03535805) evaluated an intervention for help-seeking youth with emotional and behavioral health problems below the threshold for referral to specialized treatment. The experimental intervention MMM consisted of 9-13 weekly, individual therapy sessions delivered by psychologists in a non-specialist school-based setting. The CBT-methods were organized in modules for anxiety, depression and/or behavioral problems, and the therapy was completed within 17 weeks. The MAU was enhanced by two care-coordination visits to help coordinate the usual care in the four municipalities in Denmark. The trial was conducted in four diverse municipalities in Denmark. The aim of this study is to determine the long-term effects of the transdiagnostic, modular CBT program ("Mind My Mind" [MMM]) compared to management as usual (MAU). The three-year follow-up of the RCT of MMM versus MAU is nested in a larger study of help-seeking youth screened for eligibility and stratified into three groups with increasing severity of problems. Youths with an intermediate level of problems were included in the RCT. We screened 573 help-seeking youths, and we included and randomized a total of 396 youths (age 6-16 years, with anxiety, depressive symptoms, and/or behavioral problems) to MMM (n=197) or MAU (n=199). The study participants comprise the 396 youths and their parents who participated in the RCT. We will use the help-seeking population and the background population in the four municipalities as reference groups. The follow-up study does not include an intervention. The long-term outcome of MMM versus MAU will be investigated using parent-reported questionnaires administered in average three years after random allocation to intervention. All study participants are followed in the Danish national registries.

Healthcare providers caring for acutely ill or critical patients are exposed to constant stressful situations that can lead to psychiatric manifestations. Depression and anxiety derived from stressful work environments can negatively impact the ability to perform at full capacity directly affecting the quality of care the patients receive. The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 infection created a sudden and deep crisis involving every sector worldwide not only affecting sick patients and the healthcare system but also the economy, politics, food, and drugs and social interactions. Hospital workers have experienced the crisis first-hand and have witnessed constant death, a decrease in personal protective equipment supplies, exposure to contracting the virus, risk of contagion to others, and overburdened hospital capacity. The aim of this study is to evaluate how the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected healthcare workers. Specifically, to evaluate levels of anxiety and identify factors contributing to anxiety on faculty, residents, and nurse anesthetists in our institution.

To test feasibility of online version of HEADS: UP

Despite considerable, replicated evidence of the efficacy and effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy, there is an insufficient number of professionals (e.g., psychologists, psychiatrists) in North America to provide evidence-based psychotherapy to all who need it. For example, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a greater need for resources that are scalable to help a large portion of the public to manage anxiety and attendant psychological distress. One promising avenue to increase the availability of evidence-based mental healthcare relies on technological developments, such as smartphone-enabled apps, to disseminate principles derived from existing evidence-based psychotherapies. However, further research is needed to understand for whom and in what contexts internet- and smartphone-enabled resources are helpful. The present study will examine the utility of one such smartphone enabled app, MindShift, developed by Anxiety Canada in consultation with Canadian and American experts in evidence-based psychotherapy for anxiety disorders. Specifically, the main aim of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the MindShift app to help users manage anxiety and related psychological distress as compared to anxiety and distress prior to app use. Two secondary, exploratory aims of the present study are to examine possible moderators that indicate for whom or in what contexts use of the MindShift app is particularly helpful. Adult participants 18 years of age and older will be recruited from Canada and the United States of America. Following informed consent, participants will complete baseline assessment of anxiety symptom severity, depressive symptom severity, daily functional impairment, quality of life, alcohol use, use of illicit psychoactive substances, stress associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, and demographic information. Following baseline assessment, participants will be instructed in downloading the MindShift app to their personal mobile phone running either iOS or Android OS software. Participants will then use the MindShift app as they choose for the 16-week duration of the study. Finally, participants will be asked to complete follow-up assessments 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks following baseline assessment. Follow-up assessments will assess anxiety symptom severity, depressive symptom severity, functional impairment, and quality of life satisfaction on the same measures administered at baseline.

A randomized control trial was made to examine the effects of breastfeeding support given by the video-conferencing method in the early postpartum period on anxiety, breastfeeding self-efficiency, and newborn outcomes.

The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of "What Were We Thinking" (WWWT) a psychoeducational intervention -delivered remotely via communication technologies- to prevent symptoms of postpartum depression and anxiety in new mothers; which has been shown to be effective in primary health settings. WWWT was developed in Australia and has been culturally adapted to be used in Chile. The m-health version of the Chilean adaptation of WWWT for the current study includes: Psychoeducational modules on issues relevant to mothers during the post-partum period; contact with the program facilitator through instant messaging services available on mobile phones and a virtual group meeting. This pilot study will use a mixed design. The quantitative component will consist of a before-after design with control group including 90 adult mothers of child aged 6-8 weeks who receive health care in a primary health centers in Santiago, Chile. Mothers will be randomized into the experimental (EG) or control groups (CG) in a rate of 1:1. Both EG and CG will receive usual treatment provided by primary health centers (TAU), and only de EG will receive the m-health adapted version of the WWWT. The qualitative component considers 12 users semi-structured interviews. The maximum variation sampling strategy will be used according to the completion of m-health version of WWWT. An open coding of Grounded Theory will be used to data analysis. The feasibility of m-health version of WWWT intervention will be evaluated in terms of eligibility rates, recruitment rates and reasons for study refusals, feasibility to deliver the three components of the intervention, data attrition and follow-up rates by treatment condition. Their acceptability considers participant completion of the intervention rates, and a qualitative assessment of the users' acceptability of and satisfaction. Secondary outcomes will include changes on maternal levels of depressive and anxiety symptoms, maternal self-efficacy and perceived social support. And differences in mother-infant quality of interaction between intervention and control groups.

Cross-sectional observational study of the relationship between speech patterns and psychiatric symptoms and disorders.

In France, during surgery, only 4% of parents are present at induction, most often for children with disabilities with iterative interventions. Some studies have shown that the presence of parents during induction decreases the anxiety of children, while others do not. Their conclusions all advocate preparing parents for this presence in the operating room in an accompanying course.

The purpose of this study is to assess whether the degree of anxiety experienced by women undergoing visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and Lugol's iodine (VILI) can be reduced by watching the procedure in real-time on a digital screen.

The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility and acceptability of and patient adherence to a telephone-administered cognitive-behavioral therapy intervention for anxiety in older adults (65 years and older) with cancer and their primary informal caregiver. This study will also examine whether the intervention has a clinically significant impact on patient anxiety (primary outcome) and depression, distress, and quality of life (secondary outcomes).