Active clinical trials for "Sleep Apnea Syndromes"

This is a Phase 4 randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-center, double-blind study to evaluate the effects of mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) in subjects with Sleep-disordered Breathing (SDB) associated with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) using Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF), Embletta device home-monitored cardiopulmonary evaluations, and rhinitis evaluations and questionnaires. Approximately 30 subjects 18 to 60 years of age with symptomatic PAR (with or without SAR) will be selected and randomized at one study site. The anticipated duration of subject participation in the study is approximately 39 days. Subjects who qualify at the Screening Visit will complete a 10-14 day run-in/screening period. Following the run-in period, subjects who meet the qualifications at the Baseline Visit will be treated with study medication for 4 weeks.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes, including acute myocardial infarction and stroke. Atherosclerosis is an important step for these events. Recent studies demonstrated the independent association between OSA and validated markers of atherosclerosis. However, the impact of treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on these markers is unknown. The purpose of this study is to determine whether CPAP therapy can reverses early signs of atherosclerosis in apparently healthy OSA patients.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is a common and underrecognised condition. The diagnosis of OSA is typically made after an in-lab polysomnography (PSG) which requires an overnight stay in a sleep laboratory. Many sleep laboratories have long waiting lists for PSG. There are a number of portable devices which may be useful in home diagnosis of OSA, however there is limited data on outcomes of OSA diagnosed and treated at home. In this study we propose to compare diagnostic accuracy of a home monitoring device with a PSG and outcomes of OSA therapy when implemented at home vs in the sleep laboratory.

This study evaluates the efficacy, the tolerance and the acceptability/compliance of the nasal airway stent, Nastent, for the treatment of mild to moderate OSA and snoring in European adult patients without cardiovascular and/or respiratory comorbidities/disorders.

This investigation is designed to evaluate the comfort, ease of use and performance of a trial nasal mask for the treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) in the home environment.

This investigation is designed to evaluate the performance as well as the patients overall acceptance of the interface.

This investigation is a prospective, non-randomized, non-blinded study. This investigation is designed to evaluate the performance, comfort and ease of use of the F&P Toffee mask amongst Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) patients. Up to 45 OSA patients will be recruited from the Pulmonary Disease Specialists Research database.

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the gold-standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), the most common sleep-disordered breathing in the overall population. CPAP has shown to be effective in reducing apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) as well as other OSA polysomnographic outcomes. However, the effectiveness of this device on OSA daily functioning and mood disturbances outcomes still remains unclear. The ADIPOSA study is aimed at determining the effects of three-month CPAP use on anxiety-depression symptoms in patients with OSA. Participants will be adults previously diagnosed with OSA who will be allocated to a CPAP-treatment group. Outcomes will be measured at baseline and intervention end-point (three months) including daytime sleepiness, daily functioning and mood (anxiety and depression symptoms), AHI, other neurophysical and cardiorespiratory polysomnographic outcomes, and body weight. ADIPOSA may serve to establish the effectiveness of CPAP on daytime functioning and mood disturbances commonly found on patients with OSA and, in turn, on other OSA outcomes related to anxiety-depression symptoms.

Vibro-tactile feedback may be beneficial for some patients, who have positional obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Aim: to determine whether Positional Therapy, applied by a discrete neck-worn vibro-tactile feedback device, is an effective treatment for positional OSA, in reducing the disease severity and associated symptoms, compared to Sham-Positional Therapy. The interaction between treatment and age will also be assessed, since pathophysiology, symptoms and treatment tolerance varies with age. Methods: A prospective randomised, parallel, double-blinded trial comparing Positional Therapy (Night Shift™; Advanced Brain Monitoring, USA) with Sham-Positional Therapy, performed in older (>65 years) and younger patients with positional OSA (apnoea/hypopnea index (AHI)>5 events/hour, 2:1 when supine). The primary endpoint, AHI at 3 months, will be measured by a repeat study with the device in situ, and compared between Positional Therapy and Sham-Positional Therapy. Patients' subjective symptoms, wellbeing and quality of life, will be assessed by questionnaires at baseline and 3 months. Adherence to therapy will be measured.

This is a randomized, double blind, cross-over study of the combination of atomoxetine and oxybutynin (ato-oxy) in children with DS and OSA documented by polysomnography (PSG). Participants will receive high dose ato-oxy for four weeks as well as low dose ato-oxy for four weeks in random order. During the high dose ato-oxy period, participants will take 5 mg oxybutynin and 0.5mg/kg/day (max 40 mg) atomoxetine nightly for one week. Atomoxetine dose will then be increased to 1.2 mg/kg/day (max 80 mg). During the low dose ato-oxy period, participants will take 5 mg oxybutynin and 0.5mg/kg/day (max 40 mg) atomoxetine. Dosing of the study treatment will occur approximately 30 minutes prior to bedtime. Participants who withdraw from the study will not be replaced. Study participants will undergo eligibility screening that will include an initial screening to determine whether non- PSG enrollment criteria are met, followed by a 1 night in-lab PSG and health-related quality of life assessment for participants who qualify based on non-PSG criteria. For participants who are eligible and enroll in the study, the screening PSG night will serve as the baseline measure for apnea hypopnea index (AHI) and other PSG endpoints. On the final night of dosing for both high dose ato-oxy and low-dose ato-oxy, participants will return for inpatient PSG and health-related quality of life assessment. The primary efficacy endpoint is the change in obstructive AHI from baseline (high dose ato-oxy vs. low dose ato-oxy).