Active clinical trials for "Appendicitis"

The purpose of this randomized trial is to compare two commonly utilized surgical treatments for children with ruptured appendicitis: early appendectomy, versus interval appendectomy. The primary outcome measure is time away from normal activities.

The purpose of this trial is to compare two techniques of wound closure in open appendicectomies in adult patients: continuous, absorbable, intradermal suture and interrupted, non-absorbable sutures.

Several prior studies have demonstrated that medical management of acute appendicitis in adults is a safe first-line therapy option. This study aims to determine whether non-operative management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis with antibiotics is non-inferior to operative management in a pediatric population. This study will be a randomized controlled trial comparing non-operative management with antibiotics to surgical management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis. The hypothesis is that antibiotics are not worse than surgery for the treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis in children.

Based on a regional cohort, this study we will try to demonstrate the superiority of routine laparoscopic appendectomy vs. leaving an intraoperative assessed normal appendix in situ in cases of normal findings at diagnostic laparoscopy. If routine laparoscopic appendectomy is not superior, we will recommend leaving the "normal" appendix in situ.

The aim of this study is to compare the short-term outcomes of single-incision and conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.

Research hypothesis: Does delayed primary wound closure after appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis reduce postoperative superficial surgical site infection compare to primary wound closure. Study design: This study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial of delay versus primary wound closure in complicated appendicitis. Setting: Thammasat Hospital, Ramathibodi Hospital, Chonburi Hospital, Chonpratarn Hospital, Vachira Hospital, and Pathumthani Hospital Participants: Adult patients age 18 years or older and non-pregnant in women who have been diagnosed as gangrenous or ruptured appendicitis. Outcome: Superficial surgical site infection Period of study: August 2012 - August 2014

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common acute abdomens that need surgical intervention. Laparoscopic surgery much decreases postoperative pain of wound, however, pain remains an important determinant of recovery after surgery. Intraoperative local anesthetic agent infiltrated locally into surgical wound to relieve postoperative pain is a feasible and safe method suggested in some literature. However, there is no routine use of this method in clinical practice because its benefit is still unknown. Besides, very few evidence could be found in literature review. To date, there is still no double blinded, prospective, randomized control trial addressing in evaluation of its interest. In this study, the investigators aim at investigating the benefit of wound infiltration with local anesthetic agent (bupivacaine) for laparoscopic appendectomy in adult. The study design is a double blind, prospective, randomized control trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Fifty adult patients with appendicitis will be included. The control group undergo laparoscopic appendectomy without wound infiltration with local anesthetic agent, the intervention group undergo laparoscopic appendectomy with wound infiltration with local anesthetic agent intraoperatively. The clinical characteristics, outcomes, and patient's satisfaction will be recorded and analyzed. The investigators hope this study can provide a high level evidence in pain management of patient undergo laparoscopic surgery.

Appendectomy is the most common surgical procedure performed in emergency surgery. Because of lack of consensus about the most appropriate technique, appendectomy is still being performed by both open (OA) and laparoscopic (LA) methods. In this retrospective analysis, the investigators aimed to compare the laparoscopic approach and the conventional technique in the treatment of acute appendicitis.

This study aims to compare antibiotic treatment versus surgery for patients with uncomplicated appendicitis.

Laparoscopic appendectomy (L-APPE) presents a golden standard in the treatment of acute appendicitis nowadays. However, there are ongoing controversies regarding the ideal technique of appendicular stump closure during L-APPE in the published literature. Several technical modifications of appendicular stump closure are available at the present - closure using endoloop, endostapler or Hem-o-lock clips. The aim of the proposed project (CAS study) is to compare medical and economic outcomes of patients undergoing L-APPE with different methods of appendicular stump closure (endostapler, endoloop and Hem-o-lock clips).