Active clinical trials for "Appendicitis"

This clinical trial will compare antibiotic therapy with laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment of pediatric chronic appendicitis in china. Enrolled patients will be randomised and an allocation ratio of 1:1 will be made via weighted minimisation, where half of the patients will receive antibiotic therapy with intravenous Ceftazidime sodium, while the other half will have a laparoscopic appendicectomy.

The objective of this study is to assess whether the administration of nebulized intra-peritoneal ropivacaine at the onset of surgery, compared with nebulized saline, reduces morphine consumption after laparoscopic appendectomy surgery in children and adolescents.

This study is designed to determine the safety and efficacy of non-operative antibiotic management of clinically diagnosed acute uncomplicated appendicitis in children. Enrolled patients will be randomised and an allocation ratio of 1:1 will be made via weighted minimisation, where half of the patients will receive non-operative management with intravenous Piperacillin with Tazobactam, while the other half will have an appendicectomy.

A laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) was first reported by Semm in 1983. Since then, its advantages, such as the aesthetic appearance of the wound, less postoperative pain, and faster recovery which facilitates early discharge, have been highlighted, and the number of procedures performed has been continuously increasing.

The acute appendicitis (AA) is a very common disease with a life time risk 7-8% and the highest incidence in the second decades . The aetiology of AA is still poor understood: the commonest hypothesis refers to appendix obstruction followed by impairment of wall appendix barrier and thus wall perforation and/or abscess formation1. However some studies suggest that no-complicate and complicate appendicitis are different entities allowing a different treatment. The study aims to test the no inferiority in terms of efficacy of antibiotic treatment compared to surgery in a population with high probability to suffer of 1st episode of AA.The study aims to test the no inferiority in terms of efficacy of antibiotic treatment compared to surgery in a population with high probability to suffer of 1st episode of AA.

a) Compare between Nonabsorbable Polymeric Clips and Endoloop ligatures regarding: technical difficulties. operation time. cost effectiveness. postoperative complications. inpatient stay.

Purpose: The diagnostic approach of patients with acute appendicitis (AA) remains debated. A number of clinical prediction rules (CPRs) exist for diagnosis of AA with variable sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy, in different ethnic populations. Among these, the Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) score was shown to have a high sensitivity though with a poor specificity. The aim of this study is to modify and validate the RIPASA score in 4 distinct ethnic groups, and to compare the performance of the new score to the original RIPASA and Alvarado scores. Methods: This multicenter, international prospective observational study will be conducted in 6 countries, and will include all eligible patients referred to surgical specialists with acute right iliac fossa pain or suspected AA in the participating centres. Patients will be categorized into 4 ethnic groups based on the country of origin. The modified RIPASA score will be developed in one ethnic group, and along with the original RIPASA and Alvarado scores, will be externally validated in the other 3 ethnic groups. Management of patients will be prospectively evaluated in a standardized manner. The focus of the analysis will be on the performance of the 3 CPRs in different ethnic and gender groups using receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. Discussion: We expect this study to develop a CPR that can assist surgeons and surgical residents to early identify patients with AA in the busy clinical and low-resource settings, and to optimize the diagnostic value of the RIPASA and Alvarado scores in different ethnic and gender groups.

Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency in childhood. Despite access to current diagnostic modalities, diagnosis may be challenging since the child may have difficulty in articulating symptoms. Additionally there is a high frequency of atypical presentation and rapid progression. Delayed diagnosis in children is reported as being up to 60%. Delayed diagnosis >48hr increases the perforation rate from 21% to 71%. Around 20% of children presenting with appendicitis have perforated by the time they come to surgery. Appendix perforation is associated with a prolonged hospital stay and increased cost. Once perforated, major complication rates increase from 1.2% to 6.4%, median bed stay increases from 2 to 6 days and hospitalisation costs are estimated at US $33,348. Conversely, a false positive diagnosis leads to unnecessary surgery in 12%. It has been suggested that only 35% of surgical referrals with possible appendicitis actually need surgery thus impacting on resource use. A reliable test, especially if painless, would be very useful. If positive the child could undergo early appendicectomy in expectation of a reduction in the perforation rate (and, therefore, reduction in hospital stay). If negative the child could be discharged home safely. No adequate biomarker has been identified. Technology already exists to detect changes in Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) in gases. VOC analysis is already used commercially to identify disease processes in animals and crops. Although VOC has been previously used to detect human diseases, it has never been used to look for changes in the composition of breath in appendicitis. The investigators hypothesise that the composition of VOC's in children with appendicitis will differ from those without. The investigators anticipate these differences will be of diagnostic and prognostic value in clinical practice. The feasibility of collecting breath samples from children with possible appendicitis to allow VOC testing has not been examined.

transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULAA) was reported that the operation time was shorter and the postoperative frequency of complications was not high compared to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) with three conventional ports in retrospective studies. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULAA) and to compare them to the outcomes of CLA.

Introduction: Surgery performed under low insufflation pressure combined with micro-laparoscopy (incisions 4X smaller than incisions in conventional laparoscopy) is called "low impact laparoscopy" or LIL. It significantly reduces postoperative pain and reduces the average length of stay. This technique, currently underdeveloped has never been evaluated in the literature for appendectomy. Main objective of the study: to obtain a reduction in postoperative pain when using the low-impact laparoscopy technique for appendectomies. Secondary objectives: to study the feasibility of LIL in appendectomies, to obtain a reduction in the average length of stay, a reduction in the consumption of analgesics, a reduction in costs, and a more rapid resumption of activities. Material and methods : This is a prospective, single-center, double-blind study. The inclusion criterion is the presence of acute uncomplicated appendicitis. The number of subjects to be included in each group is evaluated at 25. The subjects are divided into two groups preoperatively: Conventional group: insufflation pressure at 12mmHg and conventional instrumentation LIL group: insufflation pressure at 7mmHg and micro-laparoscopy instrumentation. Identical dressings are put in place at the end of the procedure in order to hide from the patient the protocol in which he was included. Pain assessment is recorded daily during the first postoperative week. The consumption of analgesics is also recorded. Then on the 7th day, 15th day and 30th postoperative day. During hospitalization, readings are taken by the nurse. At home, the data is entered by the patient via the Link4Life smartphone application. Conclusion: LIL applied to appendectomy has never been evaluated in the literature. It would allow a reduction in postoperative pain, the average length of stay for patients as well as improved rehabilitation.