Active clinical trials for "Coronary Artery Disease"

CAD is a leading cause of mortality in Europe. cCTA is recommended to rule out obstructive CAD, but, in most patients, it shows non-obstructive CAD. The management of these patients is unclear due to lack of reproducible quantitative measurement, beyond stenosis severity, capable to assess the risk of disease progression towards developing MACEs. To improve identification and phenotypization of patients at high risk of disease progression, we propose the application of artificial intelligence algorithms to cCTA images to automatically extract periluminal radiomics features to characterize the atherosclerotic process. By leveraging machine-learning empowered radiomics we aim to improve patients' risk stratification in a robust, quantitative and reproducible fashion. By developing a novel quantitative AI based cCTA measure, we expect to provide a risk score capable to identify patients who can benefit of a more aggressive medical treatment and management, thus improving outcome

Recent evidences have demonstrated improved diagnostic accuracy for detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) when myocardial blood flow (MBF) is quantified in absolute terms using single photon emission tomography (SPECT) compared to conventional myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). However, there are no uniformly accepted cutoff values of MBF and MFR derived from SPECT for diagnosing hemodynamically significant CAD. Particularly, the diagnostic performance for quantitative SPECT has not been validated using fractional flow reserve (FFR). The aim of this prospective study is to determine optimal cutoff values of absolute MBF and MFR derived from NaI (Tl)-based SPECT and to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of this quantitative technology utilizing invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in combination with FFR results as the reference standard in patients with suspected or known CAD.

In order to perform heart surgery, a machine called cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), or more commonly known as a heart-lung machine, is used to maintain the circulation of oxygenated blood needed by the rest of the body and its organs. Historically, when a patient is connected to CPB, their body is cooled below the normal body temperature. This is known as hypothermia. This is because scientific studies have previously shown that reduced body temperature lowers metabolism and therefore offers more protection to the brain and other organs due to the reduced oxygen requirement. The evidence supporting this practice, however, has been challenged throughout the history of cardiac surgery, with studies supporting that normothermia, or normal body temperature, is a safe alternative. Despite this, the practice of hypothermia has persisted. Published data from a survey of 139 cardiac surgeons in the United Kingdom showed that 84% still routinely employ hypothermic CPB during surgery. To assess whether normothermic or hypothermic CPB is safer, a clinical trial requiring a large sample size and high recruitment rates will be required. Therefore, the investigators aim to assess firstly the feasibility of trial recruitment and allocation adherence in this study. 100 adults across 10 different cardiac surgery centres in the United Kingdom will be recruited to a multicentre feasibility randomised controlled trial comparing normothermia (active comparator) against hypothermia (control comparator) during cardiopulmonary bypass in cardiac surgery. This study will also test the ability of the Cardiothoracic Interdisciplinary Research Network (CIRN), a trainee-led research collaborative, to collect pilot data on Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) using a regulation-approved electronic application HealthBitⓇ. Participants will also be asked to complete quality of life surveys. The results of this study will subsequently inform a large, adequately powered randomised controlled trial for optimal temperature management during CPB.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two guiding catheters in patients with coronary artery disease during a percutaneous coronary intervention between Guidex® Guiding catheter (DEMAX) and Launcher™ coronary guide catheters (Medtronic). The main question[s] it aims to answer are: Aren't the safety of medical devices inferior to each other? Aren't the efficacyof medical devices inferior to each other? Participants will be randomized (1:1) and have a percutaneous coronary interventionwith one of the two guiding catheters.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the GENOSS stent in patients with coronary artery disease who underwent treatment using the GENOSS stent manufactured with domestic technology.

The objective of this post-market Registry is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SELUTION SLR, a Sirolimus Drug Eluting Balloon (DEB), in treating de novo native coronary artery disease in larger vessels (≥ 2.75 mm). This is a post-market registry that collects the data of patients who have been treated with a SELUTION DEB. The primary objective is to evaluate the proportion of subjects who underwent Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) within 1 year of the baseline PCI.

Atherosclerotic diseases such as coronary artery disease (CAD) and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the industrialized world. An interaction between the development of atherosclerotic diseases and the oral and enteral microbiome composition has already been demonstrated in the past. The microbiome is a double-edged sword which can convey protective and detrimental cardiovascular effects. While it can promote the development of atherosclerosis through the production of atherogenic metabolites such as trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) it can also generate a protective effect through the production of metabolites such as short chain fatty acids (SCFA). Preliminary data suggest that atherosclerotic disease itself can induce a dysbiosis of the microbiome. Aim of this study is to determine the differences in coronary artery disease and peripheral arterial disease on the oral-enteral microbiome axis and downstream microbiome-dependent metabolites.

To investigate the feasibility of physiological map generated from angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) (angio-FFR) pullback and its value in predicting physiological and clinical outcomes after stenting.

Traditionally, the severity of a blockage (stenosis) in a coronary artery has been determined by visual angiographic assessment of the diameter of the artery at the level of a blockage compared to a normal healthy area of the same artery. With the advent of invasive physiological testing to assess coronary blood flow, multiple clinical trials have demonstrated a clinical benefit to a physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) approach. However, despite this and the potential for significant variation in the interpretation of coronary artery stenosis severity by visual angiography alone to guide PCI, invasive physiologic indices remain significantly under-utilized. The purpose of this study is to investigate the physiologic significance of coronary lesions deemed angiographically severe by visual estimation that are planned for PCI. The investigators plan to perform blinded physiologic assessment pre and post PCI. The primary aim of the study is to determine whether a subset of lesions visually estimated as severe by angiography treated with stent placement/PCI may in fact not be physiologically significant when assessed invasively, and thus PCI could safely be deferred in these patients. A secondary aim is to evaluate physiologic assessment post PCI to detect residual ischemia that could be utilized to optimize stent placement.

Multicenter, prospective, non-randomized, post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) study to confirm and support the clinical safety and performance of Angiolite sirolimus eluting stent to meet EU Medical Device regulation (MDR) requirements in all the CONSECUTIVE patients treated with Angiolite sirolimus eluting stent.