Active clinical trials for "Arthritis, Rheumatoid"

In a previous exploratory study, the investigators observed an effect on disease activity outcomes of anti-inflammatory diet. The investigators also observed change in microbiome and circulating metabolites. The current study will determine whether or not the addition of anti-inflammatory diet improves the clinical outcomes in participants with rheumatoid arthritis, and the role of microbiome and circulating metabolites.

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is a chronic, multisystemic, progressive autoimmune disease characterized by joint destruction in synovial tissue, causing joint swelling, pain and morning stiffness. It is estimated to affect 0.1%-2% of the world's adult population and more women than men. RA limits individuals' work, social, and home lives and functional capacities. Patients commonly experience pain and accompanying sleep problems. Interventions for these problems and symptom management are important. In this regard, this study was planned to examine the effect of distant reiki application on pain, functional status and sleep quality in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

The purpose of this pragmatic, investigator-initiated, multicentre randomised controlled trial is to study the effectiveness and feasibility of a mobile app-based self-management intervention for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), aiming to improve self-efficacy for the management of RA-related symptoms. The intervention consists of education, lifestyle advice and remote monitoring elements and is based on principles of goal setting, self-efficacy theory and behavioural economics, embedded within a platform supported by motivational features and gamification. The primary endpoint is defined as achieving at least a minimal clinically important difference in arthritis-related self-efficacy (the ASES-score) at the follow-up visit in favour of the intervention group when compared to the control group. Moreover, although qualitative studies have highlighted concerns among both patients and healthcare professionals that mobile apps might induce illness behaviour by increasing patients' awareness of their symptoms, this has rarely been studied in detail. Consequently, data regarding the effects of remote monitoring on symptom hypervigilance remain limited and conflicting. Therefore, this trial additionally aims to assess (as a key secondary objective) if a mobile app-based intervention is associated with changes in pain catastrophising, as a conceptualisation of hypervigilance to symptoms.

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis or spondyloarthritis, currently treated or about to be started with anti-TNF original drug adalimumab or etanercept will be included and randomized to either " information leaflet only " or " information leaflet + nurse information " arms, just before they see their rheumatologist for periodic assessment of disease and treatment. Patients from the " information leaflet only " arm will be distributed individually a dedicated leaflet with written generic informations about the use of biosimilars in rheumatic diseases (individual and societal advantages, pharmaceutical development, scientific efficacy and safety results). Patients from the " " information leaflet + nurse information " arm will be delivered the same leaflet, and additionally offered to have a dedicated individual interview with a specialist nurse, who will orally discuss informations about biosimilars based on a standardized talk, completed by answers to any questions by the patient. The rheumatologist will then propose, unless inappropriate based on clinical evaluation of the patient, a change in the treatment of patients from the original drug to the corresponding biosimilar. The primary outcome will be the observed proportions of patients actually receiving the biosimilar drug at the 6-months follow-up visit in the 2 compared arms. Secondary outcomes will be average time spent by the nurse to adequatley inform the patient, the proportion of patients from the intervention arm who have actually asked for the nurse information interview, and the reasons for refusal of biosimilars, when appropriate.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a public health issue because of its frequency, its functional consequences, the risk of morbidity and mortality and the costs incurred. A collaborative multiprofessional intervention initiated during hospitalization and continued after hospital discharge (ambulatory care ) would improve medication adherence in RA and therefore the health status of patients. Main objective: To compare, 12 months after the index hospitalization, the impact of pharmaceutical care provided in multiprofessional collaboration (pharmacist-physician) on medication adherence to disease-modifying treatments of patients with RA compared to usual care without pharmaceutical care and specific multi-professional collaboration. Medication adherence to disease-modifying treatments will be assessed by the rate of coverage of disease-modifying treatments (or Medication Possession Ratio (MPR)). METHODOLOGY: Interventional, multicenter, controlled, randomized, open label study, comparing in parallel 2 groups of patients with rheumatoid arthritis initially hospitalized in a rheumatology department (pharmaceutical care provided in multiprofessional collaboration (pharmacist-physician), initiated in the hospital and continued after hospital discharge (ambulatory care) vs traditional follow-up.

Montelukast is widely used in patients with asthma. Several preclinical data suggest that it could be repositioned as novel strategy for managing rheumatic patients by decreasing inflammatory mediators. Considering the probable enhanced antiarthritic effects of montelukast; it could be hypothesized that its adjuvant use might improve treatment outcomes in rheumatic patients who remain poorly controlled despite initial optimal guidelines directed medical treatment. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the potential added benefits of montelukast use in conjunction with csDMARDs in RA patients with moderate and high disease activity.

Based on recent guidelines, the investigators have developed a parallel (patient and physician) educational web-based tool. To prove its effectiveness, the investigators have designed a cluster clinical trial of a 6-month duration in which 15 centres will be randomised to receive access and instruction on the strategy or to continue standard care. The trial endpoint is adherence at the patient level, for which each centre will recruit 15 consecutive patients and measure adherence (medication, physical activity, Mediterranean diet) and disease activity as of baseline and 6 months after.

Social determinants of health (SDoH), defined by the World Health Organization as "the conditions in which people are born, grow, work, live and age and the wider set of forces and systems shaping the conditions of daily life" are estimated to be responsible for nearly 90 percent of a person's health outcomes. SDoH are key contributors to racial, ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in care healthcare access and health outcomes. The goal of this clinical trial is to identify patients with inflammatory arthritis who may respond to the simplest and least expensive intervention to address their SDoH-related needs- a tailored list of resources, those who benefit from a community-based resource specialist to help address specific needs, and those who require a nurse-trained navigator to help both coordinate the services provided by the community-based specialist, and their medical and mental health care and needs. The main questions the clinical trial aims to answer are: To test the efficacy of a rheumatology clinic-based nurse navigator and community resource specialist to reduce appointment no-shows and same-day cancellations in patients with systemic rheumatic conditions with arthritis. To examine the cost-effectiveness of each of the different study interventions for individuals with systemic rheumatic conditions with arthritis with SDoH-related needs using questionnaires and cost-related care metrics. Participants will be randomly assigned to 1 of 3 arms. In Arm 1, patients will receive a cultivated list of resources related to the needs that patients indicate on the social determinants of health questionnaire. Arm 1 is the control arm which receives the current standard of care. In Arm 2, patients will receive the assistance of a community resource specialist (CRS) - an individual without formal medical training with community-based expertise. In Arm 3, patients will receive the assistance of a nurse patient navigator with additional systemic rheumatic condition-specific training who will work with the CRS. After 6 months, patients who do not respond to Arm 1 will move to Arm 2. Patients who do not respond to Arm 2, will move to Arm 3. Patients who do not respond to Arm 3 will remain in Arm 3. Patients who respond to any arm will graduate the program at 6 months. The patients who do not respond be in their new arm for 6 months. At 12 months, all patients remaining in the study will graduate.

The goal of this interventional pathophysiological exploratory, cohort, prospective, with a 6-month follow-up study is to characterize phenotypic and functional alterations of PolyMorphonuclear Neutrophils as well as monocytes/macrophages and dendritic cells in blood samples from rheumatoid arthritis patients. Investigators will perform prospective characterization of these myeloid cells before and after treatment to assess how the functional status of PMNs/myeloid cells affects the response to anti-TNFα (tumor necrosis factor alpha) in rheumatoid arthritis. This will identify key immune components potentially involved in the activation and/or recruitment of PolyMorphonuclear Neutrophils (PMN) (and other myeloid cells) that may play a role in the pathogenesis of Rheumatoid Arthritis and may help predict the response to anti-TNFα agents, thus guiding the decision-making of therapeutic strategies.

Shared decision making is the first overarching principle for the treat to target guidelines for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and has been proposed as a potential mechanism to reduce health disparities, however there is little evidence to inform effective ways to implement this practice in the care of Veterans with RA. The purpose of this project is to evaluate the effectiveness of a multi-component shared decision making intervention on RA disease activity, adherence to RA medications and patient knowledge of RA. The proposed research will contribute to fundamental knowledge about how to effectively foster shared decision making across varied VA rheumatology clinical settings to improve patient disease outcomes and experience; and support clinicians to engage patients in meaningful ways with the ultimate goal to improve health, reduce disability, and eliminate disparities.