Active clinical trials for "Arthritis, Rheumatoid"

The goal of this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase II clinical trial is to assess the safety and effect of of IHL-675A in rheumatoid arthritis patients on pain, and function according to RAPID-3. 128 volunteers will be enrolled and randomised to one of four treatments (32 subjects per treatment). Each treatment will be self-administered twice daily for 24 weeks. The four treatments are: Treatment 1 - IHL-675A Treatment 2 - CBD Treatment 3 - HCQ Treatment 4 - Placebo

The primary objective of this study is to obtain implant survivorship and clinical outcomes data for commercially available Persona fixed bearing knee implants used in total knee arthroplasty. The assessment will include implant survivorship and clinical performance.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of filgotinib in participants who have completed one of the parent studies of filgotinib in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

This study is designed to observed prospectively the efficacy and safety of 6 months treatment of iguratimod alone, or with methotrexate (MTX), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and prednisone step by step on Chinese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA) patients who were naïve or shown insufficiency response or intolerance to DMARDs. If volunteered, patients who completed the 6-month study can continue to follow our plans for 24 months.

Background: Inflammatory arthritis (IA) causes work disability, absenteeism (sick leave) and presenteeism (reduced productivity) at high cost to individuals, employers and society. A trial of job retention vocational rehabilitation (VR) amongst people with IA in the US showed that VR reduced work disability. However, it is unknown whether this approach transfers to the United Kingdom (UK) with a different social and welfare structure. Previously, we modified the VR for the UK, funded by Arthritis Research UK (the WORKWELL programme) and demonstrated it to be deliverable and acceptable in a feasibility trial. Our aim now is to move to the definitive UK trial testing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of WORKWELL. Methods: A multicentre randomized controlled trial will be conducted. Employed people with rheumatoid, psoriatic or inflammatory arthritis (n=240), with concerns about continuing working due to arthritis, will be randomized to receive WORKWELL or control (written advice). WORKWELL includes individualised VR (maximum 4.5 hours over several months): assessing work problems; encouraging arthritis self-management in the workplace; addressing ergonomics; considering fatigue and stress management; providing orthoses and educating on employment rights and support services, assistive technology and work modifications. It also includes psychological and disclosure support, workplace visits and employer liaison (as applicable). Outcomes will be assessed at 0, 6 and 12 months by questionnaire. The primary outcome is the Work Limitations Questionnaire-25 (measuring presenteeism: summed score) at 12 and 36 months, with cost-effectiveness analysis at 12 months. Discussion: If effective and cost-effective, WORKWELL can be rolled out in Rheumatology services to help improve the quality and duration of people with arthritis' working lives.

The study will investigate the effects of a traditional, high-intensity strengthening program compared to an investigational low-intensity strengthening program that also uses blood flow restriction as part of the training program. Both groups will be compared to a control group, which will receive no training. Measures of strength, function, and patient outcomes will be taken before starting the training, at mid-term, and at the end of the 8-week training program. Additionally, investigators will collect outcome data at 6 and 12 months after completing the program to assess for long term outcomes. The eligible populations are participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthritis (OA), or myositis. The study will include about 15 participants per group, or 45 people with each diagnosis.

This is an open-label pilot study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). All patients will receive SOFUSA Enbrel 25 mg once weekly. The dose will be increased to 50 mg if the dose escalation criteria are met during the dose escalation phase of the study.

This is a two-stage study of efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of various doses of levilimab when administered intravenously and subcutaneously to healthy subjects and subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis resistant to methotrexate monotherapy. Aim of the Stage 1 is to study the tolerability, safety, immunogenicity, and main pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of levilimab after its single subcutaneous or intravenous administration at ascending doses to healthy subjects. Aim of the Stage 2 is to confirm the efficacy and safety of levilimab 648 mg IV Q4W in combination with methotrexate and levilimab 324 mg SC Q2W in combination with methotrexate in subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis, resistant to methotrexate monotherapy.

The aim of this study is to determine and compare the effects of using textured insoles and plantar massage on balance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis will be divided into two groups. In the first group the patients will be given plantar massage; in the second group, both plantar massage will be applied and the patients will use textured insoles in their indoor and outdoor activities. Plantar massage will be applied by the physiotherapist 3 days a week for 6 weeks; textured insoles will also be used for 6 weeks. All patients will be asked to complete the questionnaires, which assessed foot functionality, physical activity levels and quality of life. After each patients completed the questionnaire, the physiotherapist will perform plantar sensory and balance assessment. All assessments will be made before, after and 8 weeks after treatment.

This study will assess the safety and pharmacokinetic comparability of two VAY736 drug products in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.