Active clinical trials for "Arthritis, Rheumatoid"

This observational study will assess the efficacy and safety of MabThera/Rituxan (Rituximab) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response or are intolerant to anti-TNF therapy. Data will be collected from patients initiated on MabThera/Rituxan therapy according to standard of care in routine clinical practice. For each patient data will be collected for 92 weeks.

This is a prospective, single-arm, post marketing observational study in adult patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are discontinuing treatment due to lack of efficacy, intolerance or to an incomplete response with either infliximab or etanercept. The aim of this post-marketing observational study is to obtain data on clinical outcomes, compliance and tolerability to determine the effectiveness of switching from infliximab or etanercept to adalimumab. In this cohort, the different treatment strategies are to be studied in the context of the routine clinical practice in the different participating places.

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Cura-100 in treating rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis.

Rationale: Psoriatic (PsA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are inflammatory joint diseases that often involve the wrist and may result in progressive joint destruction followed by impaired wrist function and reduced quality of life. The first line treatment usually consists of conventional Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (cDMARDs) along with bridging therapy using systemic corticosteroids or intra-articular corticosteroids in case of limited joint disease. After initiation therapy, intra-articular corticosteroids are often utilized as they provide rapid dampening of joint inflammation in case of a flare-up of disease activity (mono- or oligoarthritis). However, a substantial part of these patients clinically respond poorly or not at all. Alternatively, arthroscopic synovectomy may provide substantial relieve of symptoms, improve functionality, slow down disease progression and prevent joint destruction, as earlier studies have suggested. Prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings. Moreover, they may prevent the need for expensive biological Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs) and assist in guiding therapeutic strategies in the long run, through collecting and analysing valuable synovial biopsies. Wrist arthroscopy is a routine procedure in the participating centres with only minor complications and fast recovery. Objective: To compare arthroscopic synovectomy with deposition of intra-articular corticosteroids (DIACS) versus intra-articular injection of corticosteroids (IACSI) in RA and PsA patients with mono- or oligoarthritis of the wrist that is refractory to cDMARD therapy. Study design: Multi-centre randomized controlled trial conducted in the Maasstad Hospital and Spijkenisse Medisch Centrum (SMC). Study population: Patients with active RA or PsA and bDMARD-naive, who develop a localized flare of disease activity (mono- or oligoarthritis) that involves the wrist, defined as an increase in DAS28 > 1.2 or > 0.6 if DAS28 ≥ 3.2 compared to the last DAS28 measurement (maximum six months before) and that is refractory to systemic cDMARD for at least three months, defined as no response on the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria. Intervention: This study will randomize between IACSI of the wrist (control) and arthroscopic synovectomy of the wrist combined with DIACS (intervention). During arthroscopy synovial biopsies will be collected and stored for later analysis of the functional and histological characteristics of the synovium (beyond the scope of this study). Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary outcome is the change in Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score from randomization to three months of follow-up. The PRWE is a validated, fifteen-item self-reported questionnaire rating wrist pain and function. Secondary outcomes are resolution of wrist arthritis measured by ultrasound, standard wrist radiographs, DAS28, EULAR response rate, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), EQ-5D quality of life questionnaire, iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ), iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ), cost effectiveness analyses (CEA), physical examination, adverse events (AE) and laboratory results. Follow-up visits are scheduled at three, six and twelve months after intervention. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with study participation: Both study arms include standard treatment of care. Wrist arthroscopy is a standard treatment for wrist arthritis and often implemented for other intra-articular wrist pathology. The risks include infection, neurovascular damage and articular surface damage. Nevertheless, wrist arthroscopy is a well-established and safe technique. Reduction of risks will be done according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. If complications arise, the treating physician will proportionate the adequate treatment according to the current protocols based on the published literature. Patients will be asked to return at three, six and twelve months. These visits are standard of care following the rheumatic arthritis protocol. Patients will be asked to complete questionnaires at baseline and at three follow-up moments. These will take 160 minutes in total. The arthroscopy group will return between ten to fourteen days for wound inspection. All patient will be contacted by telephone at two, four and six weeks for VAS pain scores. Expected results: We expect that arthroscopic synovectomy followed by DIACS will lead to significantly more improvement in PRWE scores compared to IACSI three months after intervention. Furthermore, we anticipate that wrist arthroscopy will result in lower pain scores, better joint mobility, better response on EULAR score, sustained resolution of arthritis on ultrasound, less joint damage on radiographs and is more cost-effective after one-year analysis.

Despite their efficacy in the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis and their partial advantage over traditional bDMARDs ( biological Disease Modifying antirheumatic drugs), JAK inhibitors (JAKi or tsDMARDs) have not gained preference over Tumor Necrosis Factor inhibitors (TNFi) in guidelines or clinical practice. The biggest influence on recent guidelines has been the "Treat To Target" principle (T2T), in which Shared Decision Making (SDM) plays a key part. Patient preference has proven to be a large barrier in treatment adjustments (14- 37%) while patients showed better adherence and higher treatment satisfaction when engaged in Shared Decision Making. From survey studies it is suggested that patient preference and satisfaction will be in favour of oral JAK inhibitors over parenteral biologics.The investigators want to establish the treatment preference of patients with active RA and compare the treatment satisfaction of patients who are given the opportunity to choose between the JAKi filgotinib and TNFi, to the treatment satisfaction of patients who are randomized to the same treatment options. In addition to higher treatment satisfaction and better adherence, the investigators expect to find an improvement in DAS28-, HAQ-, SQUASH- and WPAI-scores and also an improved activity and work productivity.

A potential application of therapeutic drug monitoring is to predict efficacy after switch to another biological in the case of inefficacy of the previous TNF-inhibitor (TNFi) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. It has been shown that when antidrug antibodies against adalimumab are detected (resulting in lower drug serum concentrations) in patients failing adalimumab, a normal response to a next TNF blocker can be anticipated. However, when clinical response is unsatisfactory and no antidrug antibodies against the first TNFi are detected (generally drug levels are adequate in this case), this predicts a lower response to a next TNFi. This means drug resistant failure in the former, compared to class resistant failure in latter category of patients. The current RA treatment strategy after failure of the first TNF-inhibitor is to start either a second TNFi or a non-TNFi. However, by channelling patients with sufficient adalimumab concentration to a non-TNFi will provide higher chance of disease control. Patients with very low or undetectable drug levels have an equal or potential higher chance of disease control with a drug of the same class (i.e. another TNFi).

This is a Phase Ia/Ib Study of MH004 in Healthy Adult Volunteers, participants with Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis and participants with Mild to Moderate Rheumatoid Arthritis.

RA is a common autoimmune disease that causes joint damage.It is necessary to reach the standard as soon as possible and give effective drugs according to the patient's disease activity to avoid disability. Tofacitinib(TF) is a new type of oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (JAKi) for the treatment of moderate to severe active RA. However, there is alack of Chinese data on the joint scheme, long-term use, maintenance and stop of TF in the real world. We will use the new JAK combination regimen to treat RA patients, and carry out long-term clinical follow-up for 30 weeks.

The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of single-dose, dose-escalated, abdominal subcutaneous injection of GB224 in Chinese healthy adult subjects. The secondary objectives are to preliminarily understand the immunogenicity and pharmacodynamic variable (IL-6) of single abdominal subcutaneous injection of GB224 in Chinese healthy adult subjects.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterised by polyarthritis and erosive synovitis. Articular and extraarticular sympthoms are mostly seen in patients with RA. Additionally, extra complaints such as depression, fatigue, kinesiophobia and physical inactivity may accompany. Positive effects of physical activity and exercise are known. In some studies, effects of pilates exercises have been investigated on many different diseases such as Multiple Sclerosis, Ankylosing Spondylitis and breast cancer. The aim of this study is to investigate effects of clinical pilates exercises on fatigue, depression, aerobic capacity, pain, quality of life, disease activity and sleep quality.