Active clinical trials for "Arthritis, Rheumatoid"

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affects 1 percent of the population worldwide and up to 40 percent of patients don't respond to current treatments. MBS2320, the drug being tested in this trial, represents a new approach to treating RA, with the potential not only to reduce levels of inflammation but to also directly prevent bone damage. The aim of this project is to test the safety, tolerability and efficacy of MBS2320 in patients with RA in combination with an existing treatment, methotrexate. Approximately 224 participants with moderate to severe active RA who have not responded to treatment with Methotrexate will be enrolled from around 45 to 55 sites around the world. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive 1 of 3 doses of MBS2320 (5 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg) or placebo (a "dummy" drug). The maximum duration of study participation for a participant will be 22 weeks, which consists of a Screening Period of up to 4 weeks, Treatment Period of 12 weeks, and a Follow-up Period of 6 weeks. Participants on the study will be asked to attend the hospital or clinic for regular visits during which they will have planned study assessments to evaluate the effectiveness, tolerability and safety of the study drug.

To investigate the effect of MTX discontinuation for 1 week on vaccination response to Covid-19 booster vaccination in RA patients.

This is a phase 2 study to determine 2-HOBA's tolerability, safety, and effect on isoLG-adducts in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Up to 32 subjects will be randomized to 750mg 2-HOBA or matching placebo three times a day for 4 weeks. As primary outcome measures investigators will compare tolerability and adverse events and changes in isoLG adducts in active and placebo arms. Among prespecified exploratory outcomes investigators will compare changes in markers of inflammation, DAS28 score, and 24-hour blood pressure in active and placebo arms. This pilot study will inform the feasibility and design of future studies to examine the efficacy of 2-HOBA in RA patients.

This study is a pilot, proof of concept study to determine the effects of administering an oral short chain fatty acid (SCFA) supplement along with methotrexate as first line treatment of new onset rheumatoid arthritis (NORA) patients. Up to 50 participants will be included to obtain a sample size of at least 16 participants taking the oral supplement. The study team hypothesizes that oral SCFA will change the participants' gut microbiome and regulatory immune responses. Clinical data to assess for adverse events, stool, urine samples and peripheral blood will be collected at baseline, 2 and 4 months with an optional 6-month time point. Fecal microbiome will be analyzed. Adaptive immune responses will be analyzed from participant blood samples.

Cardiovascular performance and overall fitness can be improved by high-intensity aerobic activity, and these benefits may be achievable by persons with rheumatic diseases. The investigators hypothesize that a 12-week high-intensity interval exercise program will provide substantial improvements in cardiovascular function, inflammation and symptoms affecting quality of life.

Methotrexate (MTX) is the anchor drug for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Despite its marked efficacy and acceptable side effect profile, about 1/3 of patients failed to reach RA remission. Metformin is the first-line therapy for type 2 diabetes. Its antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties make it a good candidate for the treatment of inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis.

The aim of this study is to examine the efficacy and adverse events in the following 3 groups in rheumatoid arthritis patients: Baricitinib treatment for 12 months Biologics treatment for 12 months Tofacitinib treatment for 12 months

TNFi drugs remain the most prescribed first-line biologics for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, up to 40% of RA patients fail to respond to TNFi treatment. One explanation of non-response is the development of anti-drug antibodies and low drug levels. Studies have consistently shown that: Serum drug levels of monoclonal antibodies (such as adalimumab, certolizumab, infliximab) and the presence of anti-drug antibodies in samples taken at 3 and 6 months correlate with subsequent response at 12 months. Non-responders and those who develop anti-drug antibodies are less likely to receive concomitant methotrexate or, if they do receive it, are on lower doses than responder groups. However, it has not been proven that knowing that a patient had low drug levels or anti-drug antibodies would have improved the outcome; neither has it been shown that introducing or increasing the dose of methotrexate would reduce the formation of anti-drug antibodies, thereby improving outcome. Observational data has revealed that RA non-responders, who exhibit adequate serum drug levels and no detectable anti-drug antibodies, have lower probability of response to another agent with the same mechanism of action (MOA), and may benefit in switching to a drug with a different MOA (12). RA non-responders, who have low detectable serum trough levels and detectable anti-drug antibodies, may benefit in switching to a less immunogenic drug (13, 14). These patients may have a predisposition of developing immunogenicity against the introduced foreign protein (12). Neutralising anti-drug antibodies against the TNFi etanercept or the T-cell co-stimulation inhibitor abatacept have not been detected (10, 12, 15). Furthermore whilst the use and dose of methotrexate at initiation of TNFi, has been associated with lower levels of anti-drug antibodies in our work and others (10, 16), it is not known if increasing the MTX dose once immunogenicity has developed reduces anti-drug antibodies and leads to improved treatment response. Whilst algorithms have been proposed based on these tests (4, 17, 18), they have not been confirmed in a randomised controlled trial setting to show that the intervention (testing) is effective. Based on our preliminary work in an observational dataset, this feasibility study will allow us to design a definitive study to answer the important issue of whether pharmacological testing can be utilised as robust biomarkers to optimise future patient outcomes. The next essential step, therefore, is to prove that introducing these tests improves clinical outcome. It is very important to do so because some clinicians are already requesting that their immunology laboratories introduce such tests; yet the tests themselves are expensive and have not yet shown efficacy (19). Conducting a clinical feasibility trial is one of the essential first steps in development of a full clinical trial to undertake process evaluation and assess the proposed study design, required number of participants and ensure optimum project completion. The proposed trial is a clinical feasibility trial with the aim to ensure a realistic assessment and capability to conduct the full clinical trial. Participants with RA, commencing adalimumab or certolizumab will be randomised to determine whether providing test results on adalimumab/certolizumab drug levels and anti-drug antibodies at 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months to clinicians caring for patients with RA (n=15 patients) starting on treatment with adalimumab/certolizumab, improves the course of disease activity, compared to standard care (n=15 patients). Clinicians will be provided with feedback and a treatment algorithm. The feasibility of the study will be assessed by a number of factors including evaluation of recruitment, attrition, data completeness and process evaluation. The results will be used to inform the number of participants required to fully evaluate the intervention.

To examine the safety and effectiveness after Xeljanz treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common inflammatory rheumatoid disease in France, affecting 0.3% of the general population. Without effective treatment, the persistent inflammation causes invalidating pain and joint destruction, leading to major functional disability. Biological agents have been proposed for patients with RA who have the most severe form of the disease and that are inadequate responder patients to conventional synthetic Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). TNF inhibitors (TNFi) are historically proposed as the first biological DAMRD for inadequate responder patients to csDMARDs. A diverse therapeutic arsenal has become available in recent years with the development of non-anti-TNFα drugs whose mechanisms of action are different from the classical TNFi. This new biotherapy class includes tocilizumab and abatacept, two drugs recently available for subcutaneous administration that enables ambulatory care for patients who would otherwise require repeated in-hospital care. The role of these new treatments in the therapeutic strategy has been emphasized by studies that demonstrated their efficacy as first-line treatments. However, in clinical practice, TNFi remain the most common first-line treatment for the majority of patients, non-anti-TNFα biological agents being reserved for inadequate responder patients. In second line, several studies have investigated therapeutic strategies for inadequate responder patients to TNFi. Current data suggest that it could be wise to change the therapeutic target after failure of a first-line treatment with TNFi. Data about the comparative efficacy of different biologics proposed after failure of a first-line treatment with TNFi are in progress. Meta-analyses from registries and academic trials conducted in France and The Netherlands suggest that non-anti-TNFα agents would have equivalent or superior efficacy compared with a second TNFi. This finding suggests clinicians to switch for an alternate therapeutic target after failure of a first-line TNFi. Data comparing different non-anti-TNFα biologics in inadequate responder patients to TNFi are scare. Industrial trials have demonstrated sustained biological efficacy of non-anti-TNFα biologics after failure of a TNFi. However, there is very little solid data on the direct comparison between them.