Active clinical trials for "Asthma"

This is a pilot study of the effect of montelukast in subjects with asthma who are 65 years old and older. Montelukast is a leukotriene receptor antagonist U.S. F.D.A. approved for the treatment of asthma in subjects who are 12 month old and older. This study is being done because there has been no placebo controlled study of montelukast focused on this group of patients. Elderly asthmatics have been mostly ignored in asthma studies. They are more likely to be underdiagnosed, undertreated, and hospitalized for asthma when compared to younger asthmatics. The pathophysiology of asthma in the elderly is typically different than in younger patients. This is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Investigators plan to enroll thirty subjects who have been diagnosed with asthma for at least one year, are non smoker, and did not smoke for more than 10 pack/year of tobacco products in their lifetime. After a run-in period of one week, the study subjects will take montelukast 10 mg orally for 8 weeks first and then placebo for 8 weeks, or vice versa. Primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the effect of montelukast on asthma symptoms assessed by daily symptom scores, the Asthma Control Test and the number of puffs of albuterol, and spirometric values (FEV1). Secondary objectives include studying whether montelukast affects peripheral blood eosinophils counts and serum IgE levels.

This study is the second Phase-II trial analyzing efficacy outcomes of PBF-680 in asthmatic subjects, following the supportive data from the proof-of-concept trial on the effect of PBF-680 on airway hyperresponsiveness to adenosine monophasphate (AMP). The purpose of the present study is to provide an assessment on the efficacy of a 5-day treatment course of once daily, orally administered, 10-mg PBF-680 doses, to attenuate "Late Asthmatic Responses" (LAR) as a primary efficacy outcome. The study also aims at analyzing the effect of the PBF-680 treatment course on airway inflammation-related outcomes including airway hyperresponsiveness to AMP at 24 h after allergen bronchoprovocation, plus nitric oxide fraction in exhaled air (FeNO) and airway inflammatory cells counts in induced sputum under the effect of an additional 10-mg PBF-680 dose on the 6th treatment period day. Overall, the study aims at providing evidence on the efficacy of PBF-680 on outcomes, particularly the LAR, that are well established to screen valid drugs for asthma maintenance therapy.

This is a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel-group study to determine the efficacy and safety of nebulized fluticasone propionate 1mg twice daily compared with oral prednisone administered for 7 days to Chinese pediatric and adolescent subjects (aged 4 to 16 years) with an acute exacerbation of asthma

This is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study of mepolizumab in comparison with placebo in reducing Oral Corticosteroid (OCS) use in subjects with severe refractory asthma. The study consists of four phases, OCS Optimisation Phase (Week -8 to Week 0), and the double-blind treatment period divided into an Induction Phase (Week 0 to Week 4), OCS Reduction Phase (Week 5 upto Week 20) followed by Maintenance Phase (Week 20 to Week 24). During the Optimisation Phase the investigator will adjust the OCS (prednisone/prednisolone) dose according to the Optimisation titration schedule based on a review of Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-5 score and exacerbation. In the Induction Phase subjects will be randomized 1:1 (approximately 60 per arm) to receive either mepolizumab (100 mg) administered subcutaneously (SC) or placebo every 4 weeks in addition to their existing maintenance asthma therapy with the lowest dose of OCS from Optimisation Phase. The Induction Phase will allow sufficient time for those subjects randomised to the mepolizumab arm to achieve a decrease in the eosinophilic inflammation prior to the reduction in OCS. During the Reduction Phase, subjects will continue receiving 100 mg mepolizumab/placebo every 4 weeks and the OCS dose reduction will be done every 4 weeks using the reduction titration schedule based on a review of eDiary parameters recorded by the subject, the subjects' exacerbation history, and a review of the signs and symptoms of adrenal insufficiency. In the Maintenance Phase subjects will be maintained without any further OCS dose adjustment. Subjects who complete the 24 week double-blind period and meet the eligibility criteria, will be offered the opportunity to participate in an open label extension (OLE) study otherwise they will return for a Follow-up Visit 12 weeks after their last dose of double blind study treatment. At each clinic visit, adverse events, safety labs, spirometery parameters and exacerbations will be assessed. The pharmacokinetic samples will be collected in the beginning of the treatment, prior to last dose, at the end of study (exit visit) and the follow up.

This study will evaluate two dose regimens of mepolizumab [75mg intravenous (i.v.) or 100mg subcutaneous (SC) every 4 weeks] compared with placebo over a 32 week treatment period in subjects with severe refractory asthma with elevated blood eosinophils. Efficacy will be measured by a reduction in the frequency of asthma exacerbations. Additional efficacy assessments will include measurements of lung function, symptom scores, and quality of life. Safety will be assessed by clinical laboratory samples, ECGs, immunogenicity and adverse events. This study is intended to replicate the Phase IIb/III study MEA112997. Subjects in MEA115588, who meet all eligibility criteria at screening visit, will enter the run-in period. Those subjects that are not able/eligible to be randomised at the end of the 6 week run-in period will be deemed run-in failures. Subjects will remain on their current maintenance therapy throughout the run-in, double-blind treatment administration and follow-up periods. Subjects who meet the randomisation eligibility criteria will be randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive one of the following treatments every 4 weeks for a total of 8 doses: Mepolizumab 75 miligram (mg) i.v. and placebo SC, or Mepolizumab 100 mg SC and placebo i.v. or Placebo i.v. and placebo SC. Subjects that receive all 8 doses of double-blind treatment, and meet the eligibility criteria for the Open-Label Extension (OLE) Study, will be offered the opportunity to participate in the OLE trial.

We hypothesize that extra-fine particle treatment with HFA-QVAR will be superior in improving small airways dysfunction, especially in ex-smokers and smokers with asthma. To investigate this, we will perform a study comparing the efficacy of extra-fine particle HFA-QVAR 200 µg b.i.d. to an equipotent dose of course particle HFA-beclomethasone (HFA-Clenil) 400 µg b.i.d. and with coarse particle HFA-fluticasone (GSK) 250 µg in ex-smokers and smokers with asthma. Study design: This study will be an open-label, randomised, three-way cross-over, two-center study. 20 smokers and 20 ex-smokers with asthma will receive the following treatments for two weeks:

This is a multi-center, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover, single dose study in 24 pediatric patients (4-11 years old) with asthma. The entire study consists of (i) a Screening Visit and (ii) a Study Period with two (2) Study Visits. All study subjects must be properly consented, under adult supervision, and screened against the inclusion and exclusion criteria, at the Screening Visit.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Albuterol Spiromax® versus placebo in subjects with persistent asthma.

This is a report of a protocol developed to improve asthma and COPD care in a primary care setting. The study was approved by an Ethics Committee and support by the Canadian Thoracic Society through an unrestrictive grant from GlaxoSmithKline. However, the study could not be done and the investigators report why, discussing the difficulties to perform such study. This information should be very useful to investigators planning this sort of study.

The airways in the lungs get smaller the further into the lungs they go. Most simple measurements of lung function only reflect the larger 'central' airways and do not provide information on the smaller 'peripheral' airways. Newer measurements have been developed that can now give us accurate information on how the smaller airways are working. Indeed the small airways seem to play a significant role in asthma in terms of inflammation and airway narrowing. Recently, new types of inhaler formulations have been developed that have a much smaller particle size than other standard formulations. These formulations have been shown to go further into the lungs, thus getting into the smaller airways. In this study we aim to compare the two extremes of available long acting beta agonists in terms of particle size i.e. extra fine formoterol (Atimos) versus coarse particle salmeterol (Serevent)in asthmatics with abnormal small airway function using a breathing test called impulse oscillometry. By using this test we will be able to find out whether using an extrafine particle inhaler improves small airway function.