Active clinical trials for "Asthma"

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the site and mechanisms responsible for expiratory airflow limitation in chronic, treated, non-smoking, stable asthmatics with moderate to severe persistent expiratory airflow obstruction. Treatment will include inhaled corticosteroids and long acting beta2agonists. The investigators are interested in determining whether the large and/or small airways are the predominant site of airflow limitation. The investigators are also interested in determining whether intrinsic small airways obstruction and/or loss of lung elastic recoil is responsible for expiratory airflow limitation. The investigators are also interested to evaluate the role of varying doses of inhaled corticosteroids to suppress large and small airway inflammation using exhaled nitric oxide as surrogate markers of inflammation. For comparison purposes, spirometry and measurements of exhaled nitric oxide will also be obtained if possible during a naturally occurring exacerbation of asthma.

Eurofarma Laboratórios S.A. markets a FDC containing formoterol 12 mcg/fluticasone 250 mcg, in a single capsule for inhalation (Lugano®; reference product). The product is indicated for the treatment of asthma in patients aged ≥ 12 years. The company seeks to register a product with lower concentrations of mono-drugs (6 mcg and 125 mcg, respectively) to enable the dosage step up and step down treatment strategies advocated by the Global Initiative for Asthma for the inhaled maintenance treatment of asthma (GINA, 2022 ) with these combinations. This Phase 3 study will be carried out for demonstrating the non-inferiority of the investigational drug (FDC of formoterol 6 mcg/fluticasone 125 mcg) compared to the FDC of formoterol 6 mcg/budesonide 200 mcg (Alenia® - Aché Laboratórios Farmacêuticos S.A.) in the maintenance treatment of asthma, allowing its registration as a new concentration of the drug already registered by the company.

The aim of this study will explore if the specific carbohydrate diet has an effect on asthma control in children and if it will affect the frequency, severity, and duration of asthma and thus provide it as a potential complementary treatment option for them.

This study is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase Ⅱ clinical study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, PK characteristics, PD effects and immunogenicity of CM326 in subjects with moderate to severe asthma. The study consists of three periods, including an up to 4-week screening period, a 52-week treatment period, and a 12-week safety follow-up period.

Severe asthma is now widely accepted to be a heterogeneous syndrome consisting of multiple phenotypes identified by specific biomarkers and targeted by tailored biological therapies. However, much remains unclear regarding the best approaches to manage these patients, or concerning the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the disease. Small airway (SA) are defined as those airways with an internal diameter <2 mm. In patients affected by asthma, it has been reported that SA are the predominant site of airflow resistance. Peripheral airways are thickened in asthma due to chronic inflammation in the epithelium, submucosa and muscle area. It has been suggested that the outer wall is more inflamed than the inner wall, with a higher number of lymphocytes, eosinophils, and neutrophils associated to an increased expression of interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-5 (IL-5) and eotaxin. Moreover, it is well documented that SA inflammation and dysfunction contribute significantly to the clinical impact of asthma and that 50-60% of asthmatics have a SA involvement across all disease severities. An important question is whether SA disease in asthma is variable among distinct asthma phenotypes and whether it occurs in all patients. Cluster analyses have been recently used to identify specific asthma phenotypes, but markers of SA function have not been investigated. However, evidence is accumulating to support that SA dysfunction and inflammation may contribute to distinct asthma phenotypes. Recent findings indicate that SA are significantly affected in severe asthma and that their involvement is associated with worse disease outcomes. It has been reported that patients with asthma and a history of frequent exacerbations per year had a significant SA involvement. Furthermore, peripheral airways significantly contribute not only to the level of asthma control, but also to patients' quality of life and perception of symptoms. At last more thickened SA and higher numbers of eosinophils are detectable in subjects with fatal asthma. The assessment of SA represents a big challenge and requires qualified expertise and sophisticated techniques including body plethysmography, single and multiple breath nitrogen washout, impulse oscillometry (IOS), fraction exhaled NO at multiflow, sputum induction and high-resolution chest CT (HRCT). Such procedures can either provide functional information on the degree/extent of ventilation heterogeneity and air trapping or facilitate the understanding of the inflammatory and remodeling processes. In addition, a number of clinical trials have in recent years demonstrated the efficacy of biologics in severe asthma. Omalizumab, a humanized anti-Imunoglobulin E monoclonal antibody (mAb) has been well recognized as an important option for treating allergic asthma as an add- on therapy for uncontrolled disease. Three anti-IL-5 therapies are currently available for the treatment of severe asthma, including Mepolizumab, Reslizumab, and Benralizumab. The newest biologic agent to be approved is Dupilumab that is a human mAb that targets the subunit of the IL-4 receptor. Biologics represent an innovative strategy for the treatment of severe asthma. In most patients with SAD these drugs control inflammation, improve lung function, ameliorate clinical symptoms, reduce exacerbations and have a marked steroid-sparing effect. However, there is still a significant proportion of non-responders and a lack of validated predictive biomarkers in such subpopulation. In regard to this, very limited findings are available about the effect of biologics therapy on SA.

The aim of this study is to evaluate if physical activity could improve asthma control and management in adults. With this purpose we enroll asthmatic patients between 18-64 years old, and randomized them into 2 groups: in the first, patients will receive some workshops about asthma en physical exercise; in the second no educational intervention will be done. All patients will use a step counter in order to evaluate their activity during the study. Spirometric values and questionnaries about asthma control and quality of life will be recorded for all patients. Finally 2 groups will be comparated in order to search any difference in quality of life and asthma control.

The overall aim of the study is to determine the clinical efficacy and mechanisms of action of anti-IL-4a (dupilumab) as treatment for patients with Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease (AERD).

Asthma is a common lung condition that cannot be cured, although usually it can be effectively controlled with available treatments. Yet, it is well recognised that 70% of patients are non-adherent to their asthma treatment. Personalising treatment by offering the most relevant interventions based on the patient's psychological/behavioural needs results in great success. However, health care providers have limited available resources to deliver a patient-centred approach to their psychological/behavioural needs, resulting in a current one-size-fits-all strategy due to the non-feasible nature of existing surveys. The solution would be to provide health care professionals with a clinically feasible questionnaire that identifies the patients personal psychological/behavioural factors to adherence.

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to learn about the impact of the implementation of an intervention-based case management follow-up program during periods of clinical worsening or poor adherence in patients with moderate and severe asthma. Patients will be randomized into two arms: a case management follow-up group and a control group that will follow-up according to routine care practice. A single masking (outcomes assessor) was performed. Researchers will compare the response on exacerbations, health resource use and asthma control between the two groups during a one-year follow-up. Outcomes on pulmonary function, quality of life, adherence to treatment, pulmonary inflammation parameters and systemic corticosteroid use will also be studied. Additionally, other baseline clinical characteristics and events of the previous year will be collected retrospectively for all patients. The study was evaluated and approved by a local ethics committee. All study participants will receive an asthma education session with review of inhaler technique and training in the use of self-management action plans. Only participants in the case management follow-up group will periodically send asthma control (ACT) and adherence (TAI) questionnaires to the case manager. If not completed, the case manager will contact the patient by telephone to determine the degree of asthma control and adherence. The case manager will also monitor the withdrawal of drugs on the electronic prescription. The patient will contact the case manager via a mobile app, phone or email if needed due to worsening symptoms or need for self-management support. With this information, the case manager will make decisions based on personalized medical instructions prepared by the pulmonologist at the baseline visit, which will be reviewed according to evolution.

This study will assess the efficacy and safety of 610 as an adjunctive therapy in adult subjects with severe eosinophilic asthma.