Active clinical trials for "Asthma"

In this study, the investigators hypothesize that the reference product (SalbR/Ventolin) is more effective than SalbG (Salbutamol Sandoz) at improving the lung function in children with asthma, and that this difference increases alongside the severity of the airway resistance. (Null hypothesis: There is no difference). This could be explained by different properties and deposition of the aerosol. Purpose of this research: Rejecting the null hypothesis. This is based on the answers to the questions below. Research questions: Is there a difference between the increase in FEV1 (and FVC) after 100 μg SalbG versus FEV1 after 100 μg SalbR in children aged 4-14 years with insufficient asthma control? (primary question) Is there a difference in the subjective feeling of the children after inhalation with 100 μg SalbR and after 100 μg SalbG, measured with a VAS score? Is the increase in FEV1 (and FVC) in children with asthma between 4-14 years of age with insufficient asthma control after inhalation of 400 μg SalbR different than after inhalation of 400 μg SalbG? Is there a difference in the subjective feeling of the children after inhalation with 400 μg SalbR and after 400 μg SalbG, measured with a VAS score?

This is a 12-week study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of budesonide and formoterol fumarate metered dose inhaler relative to budesonide metered dose inhaler in adults and adolescents with inadequately controlled asthma.

Asthma is a common pathology, with a prevalence of 6 to 8% and more than 4 million patients in France. Its management is based on different therapeutic axes. Their use is very dependent on disease control, with therapeutic escalation, from treatment on demand to a combination of them at high dosage, according to the severe asthma's phenotype. Despite these effective therapeutic tools, there is a lack of control of the disease in the vast majority of cases, affecting at least 60% of asthmatics. Among the factors associated with lack of control, non-compliance with inhaled therapies is frequent and requires to be systematically assessed in the absence of control. Its evaluation by definition is complex and variously appreciated, fluctuating from 40 to 80%. The means proposed for evaluating it involve doctor/patient interviews, evaluation of the therapeutic response, questionnaires, evaluation of drug consumption (evaluation of number of empty boxes, integrated electronic device, withdrawal of drugs from pharmacies, etc). Asthma control is commonly evaluated using the validated Asthma Control Test score, in clinical practice and/or in research fields. An ACT score greater than 20 indicates well-controlled asthma. In addition, a change of at least 3 points is likely to indicate a clinically meaningful change in asthma control (Minimally Clinical Important Difference) in an individual patient over time and a change of 4 points or more further reduces the risk that the change is due to measurement error. In the context of severe eosinophilic asthma, Mepolizumab has shown its benefit in controlling asthma, reducing the number of exacerbations and its ability to decrease the use of oral corticosteroids (MENSA, SIRIUS). Mepolizumab is now available in 2 new "ready-to-use" forms: a pre-filled syringe and an auto-injector pen. Both systems can be administered at home either by a nurse or by the patient himself (self-administration). The choice is left to the discretion of the prescribing pulmonologist. These new possibilities of Mepolizumab administration offer greater freedom to the patient, possibly allowing him to empower himself by carrying out his own treatment, without constraint and without being dependent on the availability of a nurse or another healthcare professional qualified to inject Mepolizumab. These new methods of Mepolizumab self- administration also open the field to therapeutic non-compliance, a new problem in the field of biotherapies used for the treatment of severe asthma. The investigator hypothesize a potential therapeutic non-compliance associated with the new method of administration of Mepolizumab, with self-injection by the patient, without the assistance of a nurse. To assess this problem, the investigator propose to compare in a therapeutic trial Mepolizumab administered by pre-filled syringe by a home nurse every month versus Mepolizumab self-administered by auto-injector pen by the patient every month.

The mechanical alterations related to the overload of respiratory muscles observed in people with persistent asthma can lead to the development of musculoskeletal dysfunctions. Moreover, the produced lung hyperinflation and high lung volumes in the asthma crisis put the diaphragm at a disadvantage in terms of its length-tension curve and lowered its excursion and capacity to generate force. According to a preliminary study, manual therapy (MT) techniques can be used as adjunctive therapy in asthma treatment. The proposed protocol is the first randomized controlled clinical trial to assess MT's efficacy on the diaphragm's ZOA in conjunction with BRE in individuals with well controlled mild moderate and severe asthma. Many musculoskeletal and respiratory outcomes will be used to investigate the under-study therapies' impact.

The purpose of this study is to characterize the bronchodilator effect, systemic exposure and safety/tolerability of two different doses of inhaled glycopyrronium, when compared to placebo. Outcome of this study will be used to determine the dose of inhaled glycopyrronium for the development of fixed dose combination indacaterol/mometasone/glycopyrronium (QVM149) for children aged 6 to less than 12 years old with moderate to severe asthma.

This is a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study to assess the efficacy and safety of Atuliflapon administered at multiple dose levels over a 12-week treatment period to adult participants with moderate to severe uncontrolled asthma.

The goal of the ALOHA trial is to investigate the efficacy of improved diet quality following a DASH behavioral intervention that has shown promising results in adults with uncontrolled asthma. DASH stands for Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension. This healthy diet is known to help people with high blood pressure manage their health. But physicians do not know if the DASH diet can also benefit patients with uncontrolled asthma. Researchers in the ALOHA study are trying to find out the answer to this important question. Researchers at UIC are studying how 2 asthma care programs compare in terms of helping adults with uncontrolled asthma to improve their quality of life. Researchers also want to learn what might explain the differences in patient outcomes that they may see between the 2 programs. The primary outcome will be asthma-specific quality of life. If the DASH behavioral intervention is found to benefit people with uncontrolled asthma, it would provide a practical, safe, and acceptable public-health intervention in the form of dietary modification to reduce the burden of asthma.

This is a parallel, treatment, Phase 2, double-blind, 2 arm, 12-week Proof of Concept (PoC) study with 2 staggered cohorts (2 arms in each cohort) that is designed to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of rilzabrutinib in adult participants (aged 18-70 years) with moderate-to-severe asthma who are not well controlled on ICS/LABA therapy. Study treatment includes investigational medicinal product (IMP) (rilzabrutinib or placebo) added-on to a background therapy of ICS/LABA (fluticasone/salmeterol [non-investigational medicinal product], standardized at screening). Background therapy of ICS/LABA will be withdrawn during the 12week randomized treatment period and resumed at the end of the IMP treatment period, as outlined below: Screening period (4 weeks) Randomized IMP treatment period (12 weeks ± 3 days) Background therapy stabilization phase (4 weeks) Background therapy withdrawal phase (4-5 weeks) No background therapy phase (3-4 weeks) Post IMP treatment safety follow-up period (4 weeks ± 3 days)

The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of Fluticasone Furoate (FF)/ Umeclidinium (UMEC)/ Vilanterol (VI) on lung function compared with FF/VI after 24 weeks of treatment.

This study will assess the efficacy and safety of dexpramipexole as an adjunctive oral therapy in participants with inadequately controlled asthma with an eosinophilic phenotype and a history of asthma exacerbations.