Active clinical trials for "Asthma"

To test the preliminary efficacy of the TASC adherence promotion intervention for adolescents with asthma in a feasibility randomized controlled trial compared to treatment as usual control arm.

A phase III study, multicenter, randomized, parallel, open, two-period, comparative non-inferiority of Eurofarma versus Alenia® in the treatment of moderate to severe persistent asthma with and without obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). ⚠️study will only be conducted in research centers in Brazil (please do not send e-mail if your center is outside brazil).

To determine the safety and tolerability of MG-ZG122 in Chinese healthy adult subjects

This is a phase II, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel group, placebo-controlled clinical study to evaluate the effect of three doses of TQC2731 on Annualized Asthma Exacerbation Rates(AAER) in adult subjects with poor control of severe asthma. It is estimated that 220 subjects will be included. The subjects will receive TQC2731 (70 mg Q4w, 210 mg Q4w, 420 mg Q4w) or placebo (Q4w) administered by Subcutaneous (SC) in the ratio of 1:1:1:1. The study comprised a 5 to 6-week screening period, a 52-week treatment period and a 12-week follow-up period. During the treatment period, the study drug will be administered from day 0 until week 48. The study drug was not administered at the 52nd week.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the superiority in terms of efficacy and evaluate the safety of QMF149 (indacaterol (acetate) / mometasone (furoate)) compared to budesonide in children from 6 to less than 12 years of age with asthma. The study duration will be up to 37 weeks including an investigational treatment duration of 12 weeks and a comparator treatment duration of 12 weeks. The visit frequency will be 3 weeks for screening, run-in and wash-out period, 6 weeks interval for visits during each treatment period, 30 days for safety follow-up.

Primary Objective -To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab compared to omalizumab in reducing the polyp size and improving sense of smell Secondary Objectives To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving CRSwNP symptoms at Week 24 compared to omalizumab To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving lung function at Week 24 compared to omalizumab To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving CRSwNP total symptom score (TSS) at Week 24 compared to omalizumab To evaluate the effect of dupilumab on health related quality of life (HRQoL) at week 24 compared to omalizumab To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving nasal peak inspiratory flow at Week 24 compared to omalizumab To evaluate the effect of dupilumab on CRSwNP overall disease severity at Week 24 compared to omalizumab To evaluate the effect of dupilumab on asthma control at Week 24 compared to omalizumab To evaluate the safety of dupilumab and omalizumab

This randomized controlled trial aims to examine the effectiveness of the Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-based Asthma Management Training Program on the health outcomes of asthmatic children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and their caregivers over a 12-month post-intervention.

This is a parallel, Phase 2, global, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, four-arms study for treatment. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of add-on therapy with amlitelimab in adult participants with moderate-to-severe asthma. Study details include: The study duration (per participant) will be up to approximately 76 weeks for participants not going into LTS study and will be up to approximately 64 weeks for participants going into LTS study. The randomized treatment duration will be up to approximately 60 weeks. The scheduled number of visits will be 13.

To compare the effects of aerobic training and behavioural intervention to increase physical activity in the clinical control of asthma and in the quality of life of patients with asthma.

Asthma attacks which are moderate-to-severe are typically treated with corticosteroids, but the optimal treatment duration is unknown and treatment responses can be variable. Inadequate treatment may compromise recovery, but increased exposure to corticosteroids is, in turn, associated with drug-related adverse effects. There is a need for a biomarker to guide duration of corticosteroid treatment in asthma attacks. One such candidate biomarker is the blood eosinophil count, which may predict steroid-responsiveness. We hypothesize that the blood eosinophil count can potentially be used as a biomarker to guide the duration of corticosteroids in moderate-to-severe asthma attacks. This study will recruit individuals hospitalized for asthma attack. Participants will be randomized to standard care or blood-eosinophil guided systemic corticosteroid therapy. Subjects in the standard arm will receive oral corticosteroids for a total of 5 days. Subjects in the blood-eosinophil guided arm will receive oral corticosteroids for a total of 5 days if admission eosinophil count is ≥ 0.300 x 10^3/µL, and receive 3 days of oral corticosteroids if the admission blood eosinophil is < 0.300 x 10^3/µL. The rate of treatment failure will be compared between these two groups.