Active clinical trials for "Atrial Flutter"

Patients are screened for significant arrhythmias and other possibly significant ECG-patterns directly after discharge and two weeks after myocardial infarction using wearable devices. The home monitoring data will be linked with extensive data from electronic health records collected before, during hospital stay and after discharge. The purpose of the study is to clarify whether home monitoring of continuous ECG-signals can be used to predict and prevent serious adverse events after myocardial infarction.

Common Flutter ablation technique use low X-ray based three-dimension (3D) navigation for catheter tracking, have become a popular implementation to treat patient's underlying arrhythmia. Compared with fluoroscopy, the gold standard X-ray based method, this recent technique provides the required anatomical information and reduce risk associated with ionizing radiation exposure. Besides Practical Guidelines "as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) to minimize and normalize radiation exposure had been published so far. The risk of developing acute radiation associated injuries still remains high. In the present study we will compare two groups of patients undergoing into cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation using either the 3D navigation ("Ensite NavX system") (n = 25) or conventional fluoroscopy (n = 25). Further developing the 3D navigation technique will help to increase safety during the treatment, for both patients and the personnel and increase the success rate during the electrophysiological (EP) interventional procedures.

Atrial flutter is a common condition that is effectively treated by ablation using radiofrequency. Due to its feasibility, effectiveness and low procedural risk, radiofrequency ablation is a first-line treatment of atrial flutter. Several studies have been published concerning the factors associated with the occurrence of atrial fibrillation during or after flutter ablation, in patients with and without clinical history of atrial fibrillation. 26 to 46% of patients are likely to develop it, according to ECG or Holter diagnoses. The figure rises to more than 50% with a diagnosis with an implantable loop recorder. In patients without a prior history of atrial fibrillation before ablation, anticoagulants are routinely administered 4-6 weeks after flutter removal by most cardiologists. Although there are no specific guidelines for anticoagulation after flutter ablation, it is currently recommended to treat the patient as for atrial fibrillation. It is therefore crucial to identify in advance patients at high risk of atrial fibrillation after flutter ablation, in order to assess the appropriateness of maintaining oral anticoagulant therapy. The objectives of this study are: to evaluate the frequency and identify the factors predicting the occurrence of atrial fibrillation after flutter ablation to determine the risk of a stroke occurring in patients with atrial fibrillation after flutter ablation. The database consists in patients of the CHU Brugmann Hospital treated between 1996 and 2018.

Prospective Atrial Flutter Ablation Registry investigating IntellaTip Mifi XP 8 mm technology and MVG isthmus ablation approach Design: National, multi-centre, prospective observational registry documenting right atrial isthmus ablation Observational treatment: Combination of MVG ablation strategy and the IntellaTip Mifi XP 8 mm sensor technology Duration: Patients will be followed for 6 months post-ablation

It is well known that atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter occur frequently after most types of cardiac surgeries.(1-4) Postoperative AF is associated with significant morbidity, longer hospital stay, and higher related costs. Currently, it is common procedure to premedicate patients with antiarrhythmic drugs for elective cardiac surgeries. Treatments such as beta blockers, Amiodarone, and electrical pacing are used to help prevent the morbidity associated with pot-operative AF.(5) Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) activation may contribute to AF. Several clinical trials have suggested that inhibitors of this system may reduce the incidence of AF.(6-12) Patients with AF are known to have increased levels of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) and some types of angiotensin receptors.(13-15) Data from animal studies performed by our group suggest that cardiac ACE overexpression may lead to arrhythmic ion channel changes.(16;17) Although not studied in this group yet, it would be reasonable to conclude that the use of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) would decrease the incidence of AF in post-operative patients, too

The goal of this retrospective registry is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Refralon®, concentrate for solution for intravenous injection, as chemical cardioversion in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation and flutter in routine clinical practice. The main questions it aims to answer are: What is the incidence of sinus rhythm restoration within 6 hours in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial flutter (AFL) after the first dose of Refralon®? What is the incidence of sinus rhythm restoration within 24 hours in patients with persistent AF/AFL after the first dose of Refralon®?

The aim of the study is to develop and validate a novel esophageal mapping system to improve the diagnostics of cardiac arrhythmias. Using a newly designed esophageal ECG catheter, esophageal ECGs (eECGs) will be recorded in 40 patients during an electrophysiological (EP) study and/or ablation procedure and in 12 healthy volunteers. In parallel acquired intracardiac electrograms will serve as reference for the developed mapping systems accuracy. Additionally, the esophageal mapping system will be compared to that of the standard 12-lead surface ECG in regard to its diagnostic performance.

This post-marketing study is conducted to characterize the ability of Apple Watch rhythm analysis software to identify Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and facilitate subsequent clinical evaluation among users who contact AppleCare.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac cause of ischemic stroke. Detecting atrial fibrillation after a stroke or TIA is critical because highly effective secondary stroke prevention therapy is available for individuals who are recognized to have atrial fibrillation. However, atrial fibrillation is likely under-diagnosed after stroke and TIA because atrial fibrillation is often difficult to detect as it is frequently paroxysmal and asymptomatic, and patients do not routinely undergo prolonged screening. The purpose of this study is to determine the diagnostic yield of a novel 30-day cardiac event monitor compared to a repeat 24-hour Holter monitor for detecting occult paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with a recent ischemic stroke or TIA of undetermined etiology after completion of a standard clinical stroke work-up (including an initial negative Holter monitor.)

The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a rise in serum high sensitivity troponin T (a marker for heart muscle injury) following a direct current cardioversion (shock therapy) used for patients with atrial fibrillation. This will help us determine if direct current cardioversion results in damage to the heart muscles in a sufficient amount to cause a rise in high sensitivity troponin T.