Active clinical trials for "Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1"

The optimal insulin regimen for children and adolescents with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes remains unknown. The purpose of this study is to determine whether a split evening injection regimen (insulin injections before breakfast, supper and bedtime) leads to better glucose control and quality of life than twice daily insulin in children and adolescents with new onset diabetes.

To evaluate the bioavailability of a tablet of AZD1656.

TELFIT is a monocenter, controlled, randomised trial. It focuses on type 1 diabetes patients that have attended a functional insulin therapy training course. The Primary objective of the TELFIT study is to evaluate whether a PDA with telemonitoring by phone reinforces the effects of the functional insulin therapy training course as compared with conventional care. Main judgment criteria: comparison of HbA1c means between M0 (start) and M3(3 months)

This trial is conducted in Europe. The aim of this trial is to investigate the safety, tolerance, pharmacokinetics (exposure of drug) and pharmacodynamics (effect) of NN1952 as tablets in healthy volunteers and subjects with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The trial consists of two parts. In part 1, single escalating doses of NN1952, placebo or insulin aspart will be given to healthy volunteers. In part 2, subjects with type 1 or type 2 diabetes will receive single doses of NN1952 (with/without a meal), insulin aspart and placebo.

The primary purpose of this study is to determine whether teplizumab (MGA031) infusions lead to greater reductions in insulin requirements in conjunction with near normal blood sugar control compared to placebo in patients recently diagnosed with type 1 diabetes.

To determine whether insulin glulisine decreases the breakfast post prandial glycemic excursion in comparison to insulin aspart.

This trial is conducted in Japan. The aim of this clinical trial is to investigate the safety (with emphasis on hypoglycaemia) after switching from long-acting insulin analogue or intermediate-acting insulin to insulin degludec (NN1250, SIBA) on a basal-bolus regimen in subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

This trial is conducted in Europe. A 32-week efficacy and safety comparison of insulin detemir and insulin semilente MC in children between 6 and 21 years with type 1 diabetes.

The purpose of this study is to see if giving pramlintide and insulin before a meal would lower high blood sugar and if a glucagon (a naturally made hormone in the body but reduced in diabetes and its role is in prevention of low blood sugar) shot given in the late "after meal" time would prevent low blood sugar. The studies outlined in this proposal might help in developing new treatment options to target "after meal" high blood sugar and before meal low blood sugar in children. This would possibly help improve overall blood sugar control and prevent the long-term complications of diabetes.

This is a randomized controlled trial evaluating different exercise modalities in previously inactive subjects with type 1 diabetes. The primary objective of this study is to determine the effects of resistance exercise training, and of aerobic exercise training, on glycemic control (A1c) in previously inactive individuals with type 1 diabetes, with background therapy meeting modern standards, including multiple daily insulin injections or insulin pump, carbohydrate counting, frequent glucose monitoring, and utilization of glucose monitoring to adjust CHO and insulin for exercise. Secondary aims: In type 1 diabetic individuals receiving therapy meeting the criteria above, to determine the effects of resistance exercise training and aerobic exercise training on frequency of hypoglycemia, body composition, lipids, C-reactive protein and quality of life. Hypotheses: Subjects randomized to resistance exercise (R and AR combined) will have greater reductions in A1c than in those not randomized to resistance exercise (A and C combined). Subjects randomized to aerobic exercise (A and AR combined) will show a trend to greater HbA1c reduction than those not randomized to aerobic exercise (R and C combined). Secondary hypotheses: We expect that both aerobic and resistance exercise will show trends to improvement in most listed secondary outcomes.