search

Active clinical trials for "Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell"

Results 621-630 of 1487

Tacrolimus, Bortezomib, & Thymoglobulin in Preventing Low Toxicity GVHD in Donor Blood Stem Cell...

Acute LeukemiaChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia11 more

This phase II trial studies how well tacrolimus, bortezomib, and anti-thymocyte globulin (thymoglobulin) work in preventing low toxicity graft versus host disease (GVHD) in patients with blood cancer who are undergoing donor stem cell transplant. Tacrolimus and anti-thymocyte globulin may reduce the risk of the recipient's body rejecting the transplant by suppressing the recipient's immune system. Giving bortezomib after the transplant may help prevent GVHD by stopping the donor's cells from attacking the recipient. Giving tacrolimus, bortezomib, and anti-thymocyte globulin may be a better way to prevent low toxicity GVHD in patients with blood cancer undergoing donor stem cell transplant.

Terminated24 enrollment criteria

Phase I/II Trial of Early Infusion of Rapidly-generated Multivirus Specific T Cells (MVST) to Prevent...

Chronic Lymphocytic LeukemiaCML (Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia)3 more

Allogeneic hematopoetic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is frequently complicated by life threatening viral reactivation. Conventional antiviral therapy is suboptimal for cytomegalovirus (CMV), adenovirus (AdV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and nonexistent for BK virus (BKV). An alternative approach to prevent viral reactivation is to infuse virus-specific cytotoxic T cells (CTL) prepared from the donor early after SCT. Such multivirus-specific CTL cells (MVST) have been successfully used in a number of centers to prevent or treat CMV, Ad and EBV. Activity of BKV-reactive cells has not been studied. Multi virus-specific T cells (MVST) are donor lymphocytes that are highly enriched for viral antigens and expanded in vitro before infusion into the transplant recipient. Viral reactivation is a particular problem inT cell depleted SCT. Median time to CMV reactivation is estimated as 28 days post T-depleted transplant, but infusion of MVST within the immediate post-SCT period has not been previously studied. This protocol will be the first of a planned series of cellular therapies to be layered on our existing T lymphocyte depleted transplant platform protocol 13-H-0144. The aim of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of very early infusion of MVST directed against the four most common viruses causing complications after T-depleted SCT. GMP-grade allogeneic MVST from the stem cell donor will be generated using monocyte-derived donor dendritic cells (DCs) pulsed with overlapping peptide libraries of immunodominant antigens from CMV, EBV, Ad, and BKV and expanded in IL-7 and IL-15 followed by IL-2 for 10-14 days. A fraction of the routine donor leukapheresis for lymphocytes obtained prior to stem cell mobilization will be used to generate the MVST cells. MVST passing release criteria will be cryopreserved ready for infusion post SCT. Eligible subjects on NHLBI protocol 13-H-0144 will receive a single early infusion of MVST within 30 days (target day +14, range 0-30 days) post SCT. Phase I safety monitoring will continue for 6 weeks. Viral reactivation (CMV, EBV, Ad, BK) will be monitored by PCR by serial blood sampling. The only antiviral prophylaxis given will be acyclovir to prevent herpes simplex and varicella zoster reactivation. Subjects with rising PCR exceeding threshold for treatment, or those with clinically overt viral disease will receive conventional antiviral treatment. Patients developing acute GVHD will receive standard treatment with systemic steroids. These patients are eligible for reinfusion of MVST when steroids are tapered. The clinical trial is designed as a single institution, open label, non-randomized Phase I/II trial of MVST in transplant recipients, designed as 3-cohort dose escalation Phase I followed by a 20 subject extension Phase II at the maximum tolerated dose of cells. Safety will be monitored continuously for a period of 6 weeks post T cell transfer. The primary safety endpoint will be the occurrence of dose limiting toxicity, defined as the occurrence of Grade IV GVHD or any other SAE that is deemed to be at least probably or definitely related to the investigational product. The primary efficacy endpoint for the phase II will be the proportion of CMV reactivation requiring treatment at day 100 post transplant. Secondary endpoints are technical feasibility of MSVT manufacture, patterns of virus reactivation by PCR, and clinical disease from EBV, Ad, BK, day 100 non-relapse mortality.

Terminated13 enrollment criteria

Everolimus and Bendamustine Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Hematologic...

Recurrent Adult Diffuse Large Cell LymphomaRecurrent Adult Hodgkin Lymphoma6 more

This phase I trial studies the side effects and the best dose of everolimus when given together with bendamustine hydrochloride in treating patients with cancer of the blood (hematologic cancer) that has returned after a period of improvement (relapsed) or did not get better with a particular treatment (refractory). Everolimus may prevent cancer cells from growing by blocking a protein that is needed for cell growth. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as bendamustine hydrochloride, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Giving everolimus together with bendamustine hydrochloride may be a better treatment for hematologic cancer.

Completed30 enrollment criteria

Study Evaluating Venetoclax in Subjects With Hematological Malignancies

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL)Multiple Myeloma (MM)3 more

This study is evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetic profile and efficacy of venetoclax under a once daily dosing schedule in Japanese participants with hematological malignancies.

Completed11 enrollment criteria

Vincristine Sulfate Liposome Injection (Marqibo®), Bendamustine and Rituximab-Phase I Trial in Indolent...

LymphomaNon-Hodgkin10 more

This study evaluates addition of Vincristine Sulfate Liposome Injection (Marqibo®) to the standard regimen of Bendamustine and Rituximab in adult patients with indolent B-cell lymphoma. This is a dose-escalation study.

Completed23 enrollment criteria

Efficacy and Safety of Tenalisib (RP6530) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic...

LeukemiaLymphocytic2 more

The trial is a Phase II, open label, Simon's two stage study design to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Tenalisib in patients with CLL who have relapsed or are refractory after at least one prior therapy.

Completed17 enrollment criteria

Dose-escalation Study of Safety of PBCAR20A in Subjects With r/r NHL or r/r CLL/SLL

Non-Hodgkin's LymphomaRelapsed11 more

This is a Phase 1/2a, nonrandomized, open-label, parallel assignment, single-dose, dose-escalation, and dose-expansion study to evaluate the safety and clinical activity of PBCAR20A in adult subjects with r/r B-cell NHL or r/r CLL/SLL.

Completed32 enrollment criteria

Acalabrutinib Study in Indian Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia & Relapsed and Refractory...

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Relapsed and Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma

This study is plan to assess the safety and efficacy of Acalabrutinib in Indian patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) and relapsed and refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL)

Completed36 enrollment criteria

A Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Obinutuzumab and Bendamustine Treatment in Participants With...

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

This phase II trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of obinutuzumab and bendamustine treatment in participants with refractory or relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Participants receive up to six 28-day cycles of treatment. Treatment consists of intravenous (IV) administration of obinutuzumab and bendamustine. Treatment time is expected to last 6 months, and participant follow-up will last 2 years.

Completed23 enrollment criteria

A Study to Evaluate the Benefit of Venetoclax Plus Rituximab Compared With Bendamustine Plus Rituximab...

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

The purpose of this open-label, multicenter, randomized, Phase III study is to evaluate the benefit of venetoclax in combination with rituximab compared with bendamustine in combination with rituximab in participants with relapsed or refractory CLL. Participants will be randomly assigned in 1:1 ratio to receive either venetoclax + rituximab (Arm A) or bendamustine + rituximab (Arm B).

Completed49 enrollment criteria
1...626364...149

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs