Active clinical trials for "Back Pain"

The working hypothesis is that spa therapy in addition to usual care including home exercises (UCHE) will result in greater improvements in pain reduction, associated disability and quality of life for chronic low back pain patients. It follows that health resource consumption and linked costs should also be reduced. The primary objective of this study is therefore to compare the therapeutic effect of UCHE alone versus spa therapy in addition to UCHE for chronic low back pain.

The purpose of this prospective post market pilot study is to evaluate the effect of Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation(B-SCS) in the management of chronic discogenic pain in subjects who are refractory to other available treatments. Selected subjects will not be suitable candidates for lumbar spinal surgery and will meet the standard selection process for SCS as routinely utilized in the study centers. Results from this pilot study will inform current clinical practice and future comparative studies in this specific population. Eligible subjects for B-SCS will be asked to participate in this study. If they decide to participate, they will be treated with the Prodigy TM and Proclaim TM (Abbott Laboratories) SCS system and prospectively followed for 12 months following implantation.

This study aims to test the efficacy of the ActiPatch® device by means of a randomized double blind controlled trial in a convenience sample of chronic low back pain patients at RPAH pain clinic. Outcome measures are validated psychometric measures evaluating known determinants of pain related disability, functional capacity measures, and pain scores; and a bespoke questionnaire assessing fidelity with recommended usage, and willingness to reduce analgesic or other pain related medications with the future assistance of the ActiPatch®.

Non-specific chronic low back pain is defined as pain that originates in the lumbar spine, is persistent, lasts more than 3 months, and is unrelated to an inflammatory, traumatic, tumour, malformation, or infectious cause. Chronic low back pain is one of the most frequent reasons for consulting a physician, and one of the most common sources of disability, particularly as a result of socio-professional withdrawl. It is a major consumer of health resources (diagnostic investigations, multiple treatments) and involves heavy expenses for the investigator's health insurance system. In view of this major public health issue, in November 2017, the Health Insurance and several specialized health organizations launched a "general public" campaign to raise awareness of low back pain. This campaign, entitled "Back pain? The right treatment is movement" was designed to encourage appropriate physical activity in patients with low back pain. Among the available therapies, multimodal programs are recommended as a first line treatment. In order to incorporate physical activity into patients' daily lives, these rehabilitation programs are based on a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach (therapeutic education, muscle strengthening, reconditioning, ergonomics, psychological, social, professional and nutritional management and cardiovascular risk factors). Although such programmes have already shown short term effectiveness, few data are available on their continued effectiveness in the medium term (1 year). This project aims to identify good and bad responders to a multimodal program in the medium term, based on common clinical parameters (Quebec City questionnaire score and spontaneous walking speed), and to identify the mechanisms underlying this response. In addition, in clinical practice, heterogeneity in maintaining the effectiveness of the program is observed but little documented. The limited data available show a heterogeneity of these programs and one of the objectives of this project will be to identify the existing barriers and levers available to improve this situation.

This study tests the hypothesis that radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) in combination with the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug Celecoxib and the antispasmodic drug Eperisone (hereafter, "C-E drug therapy") is statistically significantly more effective than either rESWT or C-E drug therapy alone in the treatment of chronic non-specific low back pain.

This study will be a prospective, open-label, multi-center study that will collect safety data for the minimally invasive PerQdisc Nucleus Replacement Device deployed to reduce chronic low back pain.

Lumbar pain, or low back pain, may be defined as pain or discomfort located from the lower portion of the costal margin to the gluteal folds, with or without referred pain in the legs. This pain is classified as non-specific lumbar pain when its cause is unknown, as well as chronic when it persists for longer than three months with the appearance of disabilities for activities of daily life. Treatments for low back pain are usually pharmacological, focusing on analgesics, muscle relaxants and anti-inflammatories. Although protective factors, such as exercise, healthy diet and functional training may mitigate the evolution of pain, physical disability due to pain and functional loss reduce quality of life. Photobiomodulation (PBM) can be defined as the therapeutic use of light sources to reduce inflammation and relief pain. In this context, the objectives of this study are to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of an application protocol of an LED cluster for the treatment of chronic low back pain in a randomized, double-blind clinical trial that will be conducted in the outpatient facility of Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove). Patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain, who signs the Informed Consent Form approved by the Uninove Institutional Review Board will be included in the study. Treatment sessions will be performed with a LED cluster three times a week for 4 weeks (totaling 12 sessions) in the lumbar region, and the outcomes will be measured with the following evaluations: VAS - Visual Analog Scale; Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ); Schöber test; Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire and Algometry.

Lumbar pain is one of the most common injuries being the cause of morbidity in the individual generating occupational disability with strong personal, social and economic impact. As one of the methods of treatment, Pilates is a method that has good results for the management of this dysfunction. However, it is not known exactly which approach Pilates can bring better results for this population. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the effects of two types of Pilates method interventions on non-specific chronic low back pain. A blinded randomized clinical trial, will be held. 28 patients divided randomly into two groups will be assessed, the Mobilization Pilates (MP) and the Stabilization Pilates (SP). Both groups will be formed by individuals of both sexes and aged 21 to 41 years with chronic low back pain. Both groups will receive 10 sessions of Pilates Methods twice a week, with each session taking an average of 50 minutes, therefore the MP will focus on a lumbo-pelvic mobilization exercises approach and the SP will focus on lumbo-pelvic stabilization exercises approach. At the beginning and end of the 5 weeks the individuals are evaluated to verify the presence of pain and disability with VAS of pain and Oswestry Questionnaire, and also with the Functional Movement Screen. Data will be analyzed statistically.

The aim is to test whether the psychotherapeutic intervention Somatic Experiencing targeting Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms will have an additional positive effect on the outcomes of guided physiotherapy against chronic back pain development.

Clinical evidence about the effects of cannabis in the management of acute pain is rather scarce, mostly consisting of case report-based opinions on adverse events during or after general anesthesia after smoking cannabis, experimental pain trials in healthy volunteers, and a few clinical trials using different drugs, dosages and routes of administration. It is difficult to draw strong conclusions from the available evidence, that may seem sometimes even contradictory, mainly due -the investigators believe- to the many sources of variability in the study designs (e.g.: heterogeneity of the study samples, underpowered, unblinding, lack of randomization, timing of the therapeutic intervention, different experimental pain models, inclusion of different kind of surgical pain, etc.). Nevertheless, expert's opinion after a critical review of the literature is that cannabis and cannabinoids may have a beneficial role in the management of acute pain, at least for a selected group of patients and through an appropriate therapeutic intervention. Cannabis oil seem to be most suitable to our investigation. The co-administration of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) with cannabidiol (CBD) may translate into additional therapeutic benefits with an attenuation of adverse effects. And will help treat acute radicular back pain