Active clinical trials for "Back Pain"

In this cross-over study 25 patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) were tested for pain relief in 2 conditions: while using the Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) application and without using it. Primary outcome: Movement-Evoked Pain (MEP). This was measured using the Back Performance Scale (BPS) and a 5-minute walk test (5MWT). Participants performed 5 functional tasks and were asked to rate their pain before, during, and after each movement on a numeric rating score scale. The same principle will be used for the 5MWT: for each walking-minute, 3 pain measurements will be assessed.

The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the benefit of biofeedback training on the capacity of chronic low back pain patients to decrease their lumbar paraspinal muscles activity during trunk full flexion and its relationship with changes in clinical outcomes. To do so, twenty patients with nonspecific mechanical low back pain will be recruited and all participants will take part in four sessions of supervised biofeedback training, consisting of 5 blocks with at least 12 trunk flexion-extension tasks. It is hypothesized that participants will have improved neuromechanical parameters with the biofeedback training and that this improvement will be positively associated to changes in clinical outcomes. This study will also allow for generation of preliminary data, in order to plan for a larger randomized control trial.

The purpose of this study is to compare changes in spinal stiffness and back muscle activity between spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) responders, non-responders and asymptomatic participants. Additionally, the investigators wanted to compare the amount of lumbar degeneration between SMT responders, non-responders and asymptomatic participants. This study also determines if the presence of pain modifies post-SMT spinal stiffness and back muscle activity.

Nerves in your body transmit signals to and from your brain and the cells in your body. In the event of an injury or disease, these nerves transmit pain. Sometimes, when an injury doesn't heal, chronic pain can develop. One way to treat chronic pain is to interrupt these pain signals. One method of doing this is to use Radio frequency ablation (RFA). Radio frequency ablation (RFA) is a medical procedure in which heat is generated from high frequency electrical current in order to lesion (burn) nervous tissue. Radiofrequency ablation is used to treat many conditions in several areas of the body including cardiac (heart) as well as chronic pain. Probes (needles) are inserted into the body to a specific location and the electrical current is passed through these needles. This electrical current creates heat in your body and forms small lesions or burns in a specific place. Doctors will use tools, such as fluoroscopy (x-rays) and injections to locate the specific nerves that are transmitting pain and then use the electrical current to destroy those nerves. Equipment used include generator, built in nerve stimulator, different needles and probes and water cooling system in case of the cooled RFA. There are several types of probes or needles that are used to transmit energy and create lesions. This study is going to compare 2 types - standard radiofrequency and 'cooled' radiofrequency. The only difference is that the 'cooled' radiofrequency probes have water running through the probe tip, which keeps the tip cool and allows a larger lesion to be made. Since the doctor can't actually see the nerve he is trying to target, the larger lesion should theoretically improve his chances of hitting it. The 'cooling' of the water also allows the temperatures to be lower than what is needed for standard RF. In this study, the investigators would like to compare the differences between standard RFA (90°C) and "cooled" RFA (60°C) ablation techniques and determine if one is better for pain relief. All of the probes that are used to perform radiofrequency ablation are FDA approved and are commonly used to treat patients with chronic back pain. Participating in the study involves being randomly assigned to received either standard or cooled RFA. The procedure for both standard and cooled RFA is basically the same. The only difference is with standard RFA, the doctor may perform up to 2 lesions, instead of 1 if they are using cooled RFA. Both study groups will receive local anesthetic prior to procedure. The treating doctor will use a machine called a C-Arm to take x-rays. These x-rays will guide the doctor to be sure the probes are in the right place. Once the probe placement is confirmed, the doctor will turn on the generator and create the lesion. This process will be repeated depending on how many lesions need to be created. After the procedure there will be follow up visits at 1, 3 and 6 months. Level of pain, health and recovery information will be collected.

Determine the improvement in nonspecific low back pain patients with osteopathic techniques (Body Adjustment Protocol) and know changes in stabilometric measures analyzed with a stabilometric platform (Footscan®).

Low back pain (LBP) is the most frequently reported musculoskeletal problem and third most frequently reported symptom of any kind in people over the age of 75. In fact, 17.3% of all visits to physicians for LBP involve individuals over 65. In older adults, LBP has been associated with a host of negative consequences, including decreased physical function, increased fall risk, increased mood disturbance and increased health care utilization. Surprisingly, little research has focused on LBP in people over 65. But, recent evidence demonstrates that LBP is associated with increased intramuscular fat infiltration in the abdominal and paraspinal muscles and that this altered muscle composition increases the risk of mobility-related functional decline in older adults. While trunk muscle training (TMT) has been used in younger LBP groups, it is unproven in elders and, alone may not be sufficient to substantially improve function and symptoms, given the compromised state of ages muscle. TMT augmented with neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) known to improve strength and function beyond the capacity of volitional exercise alone, may provide greater improvements. Treatment of chronic LBP in older adults using an exercise intervention has been hypothesized as a way to prevent functional decline and frailty progression; however this hypothesis has yet to be experimentally confirmed. In this exploratory study, the investigators will test the hypothesis that TMT plus NMES will result in reduced disability and pain severity compared to usual care in elders with chronic LBP.

The study explores the feasibility of Eye-Movement-Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) in non-specific chronic back pain.

Pelvic girdle and low back pain are common in pregnancy, and cause severe impairment in 10% of women. Our hypothesis is that offering acupuncture in addition to standard care would reduce pain and impairment throughout pregnancy. 300 pregnant women from 5 maternity units will be randomized over a 3 year period to receive standard care or standard care plus acupuncture. Main outcome will be the number of days during pregnancy with maximum pain ≤ 4/10. Secondary outcomes will compare groups for an impairment score and for direct and indirect costs.

This pilot study will evaluate the feasibility of having a non-behavioral health provider deliver a combination of manual therapy (MT) and cognitive behavioral therapy for pain (CBT-p). In addition, we will evaluate differences in outcomes in patients undergoing the combined intervention of CBT-p and MT and those undergoing MT alone.

This is a trial to validate the use of the STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST) in the Military Health System for patients with low back pain presenting to primary care.