Active clinical trials for "Back Pain"

Low back pain has become a major concern to employees and employers because of its negative impact on employee health and productivity. The objective of this study is to investigate whether a return-to-work intervention conducted during inpatient rehabilitation improves functional limitations that are related with low back pain and interfere with job performance.

Occupational injury results in family economic crisis and national productivity loss; it is really becoming an important issue in Taiwanese society. Low back pain is the most frequent injury affecting workers. In addition to the prevention of injury, having a work-hardening program and getting the injured workers returned to work are also challenges for medical personnel. The purposes of this study are: to develop a guideline to assess the low back pain workers' impairment and working capacity; to formulate a feasible work-hardening program for the low back pain workers; and to execute the program, evaluate the training effect and then follow up the rate of return to work of the low back pain workers. In the first year, a guideline for assessment of low back impairment and working capacity will be developed. It may consist of the demographic data, the working status, the physical need in work, trunk muscle isokinetic strength, Oswestry low back disability questionnaire, functional capacity evaluation and quality of life questionnaire. The whole assessment package will be empirically applied in low back pain workers and the validity and reliability will be tested. A work-hardening program for low back pain workers will be established in the first year through meetings with experts and literature review. The work-hardening program will consist of training of trunk muscle strength, flexibility, and general fitness. A sling-exercise training model will be applied in the program. In the second year, low back pain workers in outpatient departments will be recruited with their own agreement and grouped randomly into either the work-hardening group or the control group. The expected number of subjects is 30 in each group. According to the result of impairment assessment and work capacity, the workers in the work-hardening group will start the individualized work-hardening program for 3 months. After the program, the workers will be assessed again to evaluate the training's effect, and the investigators will follow the rate of return to work among them 3 and 6 months after the program. The workers in the control group will be followed for 6 and 9 months after enrollment to collect the rate of return to work in this group.

This study will evaluate a new approach for back pain care management using artificial intelligence and evidence-based cognitive behavioral therapy (AI-CBT) so that services automatically adapt to each Veteran's unique needs, achieving outcomes as good as standard care but with less clinician time.

A fundamental clinical problem in individuals with chronic low back pain is the significant alteration in movement patterns that restrict lumbar spine motion. This is particularly true for individuals with fear of re-injury with movement (i.e., kinesiophobia). The primary aims of the current study are to use a whole body video game environment to 1) determine the effects of game play on lumbar spine flexion and expectations of pain and harm and 2) determine the effects of altered movement gain on lumbar spine flexion.

This clinical pilot trial will investigate the effects of technology-supported exercise therapy for chronic non-specific low back pain. Patients will follow an intensive rehabilitation program (2x/week for 18 weeks), with emphasis on motor control training that is supported by technology. The technological system consists out of motion tracking sensors that register the movements and position of the lumbar spine.

Nonspecific low back pain (NLBP) is the diagnosis for 85% of low back pain sufferers with no underlying medical cause (e.g., herniated disc, spinal stenosis) that requires physician care. Treatment, however, is impractical for many physicians to implement during office visits, and there are relatively few providers for NLBP treatment that follow national pain control guidelines. This study evaluated the efficacy of an on-line intervention using desktop computers or mobile technology to help users self treat NLBP occurrences and to engage in activities to decrease future occurences.

Introduction: Non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP) is one of the most frequent causes for patient disability and a general recurrent cause for medical consultation with high costs to public health. From rehabilitative medicine, physiotherapy is commonly offered. Although this treatment is aimed to reduce disability, pain severity and pain-related anxiety-depressive symptoms, many patients report partial improvement and recurrent intensive and disabling pain episodes. Therefore, a new approach in the treatment and rehabilitation of this pathology that takes into account psychosocial aspects that might be modulating pain is necessary. Material and methods: This project aims to assess the efficacy of two complementary interventions to standard physical therapy, such as relaxation techniques and cognitive-behavioral intervention, to improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among patients with CLBP. It is hypothesized that groups receiving these complementary interventions will significantly improve their adherence to physiotherapy and the control of their pain and, ultimately, these aspects will facilitate a decreasing of pain intensity and better HRQoL. For these purposes, a pre-post longitudinal design will be carried out, with follow-up assessments at 6 and 12 months in a sample of 66 participants. This sample will be divided into: control group (physiotherapy), intervention group 1 (physiotherapy and relaxation techniques-sophrology) and intervention group 2 (physiotherapy and cognitive-behavioral intervention). Expected impact: Study results are not available yet. However, if working hypotheses are confirmed, a multidisciplinary model of care for CLBP will be empirically justified. This approach is expected to benefit HRQoL among these patients implying a significant short-mid term reduction of public health costs.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate effectness of Tramadol Hydrochloride/Acetaminophen SR Tab. and Tramadol Hydrochloride/Acetaminophen Tab. in patients with low back pain.

Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common reasons for seeking medical care and accounts for over 3.7 million physician visits/year in the U.S. alone. Ninety percent of adults will experience low back pain in their lifetime, 50% will experience recurrent LBP, and 10% will develop chronic pain and related disability. While there is growing evidence for the clinical effectiveness of alternative and complementary therapies to treat low back pain, little is known on the physiologic consequences and effects of these treatments. Further, additional data is needed to understand how these different treatment techniques effect clinical changes in pain and disability. The lack of empirical data hinders acceptance by the wider scientific and health-care communities, and it also limits the development of rational strategies for using alternative and complementary therapies.

Back pain costs the U.S. over $100 billion annually, and much of this spending is wasteful due to the overuse of advanced diagnostic imaging. Despite prominent clinical guidelines and the nationally recognized Choosing Wisely campaign discouraging use of costly and low value imaging, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) studies remain frequently overused. Real-time electronic clinical decision support (CDS) at the point of care has been increasingly emphasized as an important strategy to improve the value of back pain management; however, studies suggest that CDS at best only modestly influences practice patterns. The aim is to implement a behavioral economic-based intervention in the ED to promote the use of CDS system.