Active clinical trials for "Back Pain"

We propose here to evaluate the precision of lumbar periradicular infiltration performed under a transverse ultrasound approach by performing a fluoroscopic control once the needle in the desired position. The effectiveness of the technique will be assessed by measuring different pain and disability scores at four weeks post-infiltration: the Visual analogue pain Scale score, the DN4 score, and the Oswestry disability score (ODI); The decrease in irradiation received will be collected, compared to that of the conventional fluoroscopic technique.

RATIONALE: Exposure in vivo therapy aims to reduce pain-related fear - a key maintaining factor of chronic low back pain- while increasing level of daily functioning, despite the pain. This is done by exposing patients to their most feared activities/movements, while behavioral experiments are performed that serve to correct catastrophic (erroneous) beliefs about pain. Yet, performing exposure exercises might be very threatening for patients and might encourage them to build in subtle safety-seeking behavior. Whether safety-seeking behavior should be allowed or not during therapy is heavily debated. Whereas some argue that it will only interfere with therapeutic progress because it prevents the disconfirming experience exposure tries to offer, other argue that it will facilitate therapeutic progress because it enhances one's sense of control, if used judiciously. So far (clinical-)experimental studies have provided mixed evidence nor have they lead to any clinical recommendation. Hence, in a replicated single-case experiment, we will compare exposure therapy with versus exposure without safety-seeking behavior versus exposure only. STUDY POPULATION: Participants are chronic low back pain patients seeking treatment, who fulfill all inclusion and exclusion criteria and participate voluntarily. INTERVENTION: All participants receive exposure therapy at the rehabilitation department of the academic hospital in Maastricht, but with different recommendations for the use of safety-seeking behavior. We will assess: 1) daily measures of fear, pain intensity and self-reported achievement of goals and 2) non-daily measures of pain disability, pain-related fear, pain catastrophizing, pain solutions, need to control and safety-seeking behavior. To measure to the influence of safety-seeking behavior on actual level of functioning, two behavioral performance tasks will also be presented, ie. a bag carrying task and a personalized task. BURDEN AND RISKS: There are no risks associated with participation to this study that are not otherwise related to rehabilitation and movement in general and participation is completely voluntary. Participants are requested to fill out questionnaires on a daily basis at home (computerized if possible), as well as on different time points during the study and at follow up and perform two behavioral performance tasks. This study could help to further improve the beneficial long-term effects of exposure.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of facet joint infiltration with corticosteroids in the treatment of low back pain due to facet joint osteoarthritis.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether pamidronate is effective and well-tolerated in the treatment of painful degenerative disk disease, also known as Modic type 1 changes

The aim of this investigation is to determine whether the use of painPREMIER will significantly improve function in patients with low back pain in an occupational health clinical setting. painPREMIER is a tool that assists clinicians in the accurate diagnosis of back pain and associated problems in order to treat them most effectively.

Chronic nonspecific low back pain is a major health and socioeconomic responsible for a high rate of employee absenteeism and reduced functional performance. The use of acupuncture as an alternative therapy in the treatment of low back pain and electroacupuncture to enhance the treatment has been effective; however, there is little evidence of the effectiveness of one over the other.

Rationale Statement of the Problem. Low back pain is a significant societal problem in the United States, affecting approximately one-fourth of all Americans at any given time. Non-pharmacological therapies have not been well studied although preliminary evidence shows the utilization of bracing may be beneficial in reducing pain and medication usage. Hypotheses or Key Question. The investigators hypothesize that the use of an inelastic lumbar brace may decrease opioid use in chronic low back pain patients on a stable opioid regimen. The investigators propose to conduct a randomized controlled study to test our hypothesis. Specific Objectives. AIM 1: To evaluate the opioid consumption in chronic low back pain patients on a stable opioid regimen in a three armed trial, after an intervention of an in-elastic lumbar brace, elastic abdominal binder (standard care), and no brace (control). AIM 2: To evaluate changes in secondary endpoints such as pain intensity, quality of life, and functional capacity. Long Term aims: To decrease patient's chronic pain level, improve overall daily function, decrease overall opioid intake and improve quality of life.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) delivered via the Empi Select TENS device provides relief of chronic lower back pain.

The purpose of this study is to compare improvement in low back pain with Wallis (interspinous process implant) to exercise and injections.

Systematic reviews evaluating the effectiveness of supervised exercise therapies commonly conclude that, to date, there is no evidence to support the superiority of one form of exercise over another. Randomized controlled trials to date included mostly trunk strengthening exercises (e.g. bird dog, plank) and there is no evidence about supervised, individually graded integral movement therapy program for patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). The research design is a randomized clinical trial with parallel-group design including two intervention groups: integral movement therapy and conventional local movement therapy. Participants in each group will receive 20 supervised sessions in a 10 week period, two times per week, with approximately 1 hour per session. Outcome assessments will occur at baseline and immediately post-intervention, follow up will take place at 6 months and 12 months after finishing the intervention. Pre specified analyses will evaluate the main effects of the treatment. This trial will use a novel, previously unexplored integral approach to CLBP through exercises. In contrast to commonly used exercise programs, the integral program does not include specific local strength exercises for hip and trunk flexors and extensors. However, learning dynamic trunk muscle control in various body positions with added limb movements could be beneficial because of the parallels to everyday work. The study will contribute to clinical practice by providing evidence to guide professionals when deciding for the proper and efficient treatment of patients with CLBP.