Active clinical trials for "Back Pain"

The planned research will address the behavioral and emotional factors associated with low back pain rather than a structural and biological cause. It will be determined to what extent the results obtained according to the ICF model are effective on the participation of patients with low back pain in daily activities, and it will become clear whether patients with low back pain should be approached only mechanically in the rehabilitation programs.

Low back pain is a debilitating condition experienced by people of all age groups. This study will be completed in two stages in which back pain assessment tools will be first translated to Urdu language and later on age-related bias on biopsychosocial factors will be assessed using various biopsychosocial tools over a period of six months.

This is a NIAMS-sponsored pilot clinical trial being conducted through the NIH Helping to End Addition Long-term (HEAL) Initiative's Back Pain Consortium (BACPAC) Research Program. The primary objective of this pilot trial is to preliminary test the impact of a wearable soft robotic exosuit device on pain and disability when used in the physical therapy treatment of individuals with Low Back Pain (LBP). This pilot trial will also determine whether the exosuit improves training capacity within session and through the course of physical therapy care by longitudinally assessing natural and exosuit augmented biomechanics. Ultimately, these results will inform the design of a larger pragmatic clinical trial.

The aim of this study is to examine the effects of classical massage on pain, spinal mobility, functional and psychological state, and life quality in individuals with chronic low back pain.

• To compare the diagnostic and prognostic blood markers in acute and chronic nonspecific low back pain with healthy controls

The purpose of this study is to see if the use of Alocyte (cord blood plasma plus mononucleic cells) will be safe, well tolerated, and whether it causes any side effects. The study will also examine if the use of the Investigational Product (IP) is able to reduce local inflammation or alleviate Facetogenic back pain

The goal of this implementation trial is to evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with usual physiotherapy care compared to individualized physiotherapy in accordance with the Specific Treatment of Problems of the Spine (STOPS) approach in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). The main questions it aims to answer are: Is the STOPS approach more effective than usual care physiotherapy among patients with CLBP? Is STOPS physiotherapy cost-effective compared to usual physiotherapy care for patients with CLBP. Does STOPS training improve the quality of care among Bangladeshi physiotherapists?

Lumbar degenerative disc disease and discogenic low back pain is comparatively common and disabling musculoskeletal condition, however there is no conclusive evidence regarding the positive effects of conservative physical therapy management in terms of radiological changes and improvement in disc height. For this reason, the current study will not only look into the positive effects of conservative physical therapy on postural stability, pain and function, but also in terms of disc height in persons with discogenic low back pain.

The health care is faced by a growing challenge in the years to come: increasing age and chronic morbidity raising the costs, combined with decreased work participation. Among the conditions on the rise, we find anxiety/depression, musculoskeletal conditions, type 2 diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Recently, the rise of the Corona pandemic has yielded another group of (primarily young) patients with decreased work capacity, the post-Covid syndrome sufferers. The aim of the present study is to establish, describe and summarize the experiences with a novel approach to rehabilitation for five of the most costly conditions; 1) low back pain, 2) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 3) type 2 diabetes mellitus, 4) mixed anxiety/depression and 5) post-Covid fatigue. The concentrated interdisciplinary rehabilitation is characterised by three phases; Pre-intervention preparation (1-2 months): with the aim to mobilize the patients' resources for change Concentrated group intervention (2-5 days): interdisciplinary team - individually tailored training (further described below) Post-intervention follow-up (1 year): digital follow-up with the aim of integrate the changes into everyday living The concentrated intervention: The core intervention is based on trans-diagnostic features of the highly successful 4-day intervention for Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, namely: Initiate treatment when the patient is ready for change Focus on the behavioral patterns which maintain the disorder and help the patient to identify situations where they can choose to break the pattern ("micro-choices"). Assist the patient when they practice breaking the patterns. This may pertain to how they do physical training or to the way they walk, sit, eat, talk, take their medication and sleep, or to how they engage in social activities or take care of others. Use long sessions to ensure that they face a broad range of potential micro-choices Work side-by side with others going through an analogous pattern of change Prepare them for taking responsibility for integrating the change into every-day living Main outcomes will be Completion rates Patient satisfaction Changes to perception of illness Patient activation Secondary outcomes will be Level of functioning Qualitative description of participants' experiences

Seventy-eight percent of the population declares being concerned by pain, directly or indirectly. Chronic pain, defined as pain that has lasted for more than three months, affects more than one third of the French population. The national survey of the French Society for the Study and Treatment of Pain (SFETD), conducted in 2009, reveals that the most widespread chronic pain is low back pain (20%). Pain not only affects the body, but also destroys the person who endures it. A comparative study by Attal et al. carried out on a sample of 1,591 chronic pain sufferers and 1,237 non pain sufferers shows a major impact of pain on the individual's quality of life (SF12), sleep (MOS sleep) and anxiety and depression (HADS). The 2009 report of the French National Authority for Health (HAS) shows that chronic pain generates a significant societal cost. Low back pain is the leading cause of activity limitation in people aged 45 to 65, and the third leading cause of chronic disability. It is the leading cause of disability in people under 45 years of age, and the leading cause of work stoppage and occupational disease. The reference tool for assessing pain is currently the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). However, several factors considerably limit the relevance of an exclusive use of this tool: For the patient: the intensity of pain is objectively influenced by many parameters such as the time of day, stress, position, duration of evolution, mechanical or "neuropathic" character, paroxysms, etc. These are all elements that objectively disrupt the evaluation performed by the VAS. When the subjective and emotional dimension is included in these elements, the cloudiness of "true" perception of such a sensation increases even more. Difficulties of evaluation for the carer: carers are therefore confronted with a lack of relevance of objective pain evaluation tools, and researchers have to deal with data that are often not very reproducible. A fortiori, the second problem arising from this concerns the difficulty of comparing the effectiveness of different therapeutic strategies. The VAS cannot, for example, take into account the pain dominance in the case of multi-site pain, nor the surface area of the pain zone or even less its typology or topology. This information is however essential to determine the choice of the most appropriate therapeutic strategy. The difficulties of evaluation for the health care system: in fact, beyond the therapeutic wandering imposed on certain patients on a "micro" scale, it must be considered that this randomness of evaluation has an impact on the entire health care system. When a decision has to be made to reimburse a particular expensive drug or implantable medical device for pain relief, this reflection has to be extended to the "macro" level. This review thus reveals a threefold need for innovation in pain assessment: for the patient, for the caregiver and for the healthcare system.