Active clinical trials for "Back Pain"

As a leading cause of disability worldwide, chronic low back pain (cLBP) represents a significant medical and socioeconomic problem with estimated health care spending of $87 billion/annually. The efficacy of dorsal column electrical stimulation to inhibit pain was first described over 50 years ago. Since then, several large clinical trials have investigated the therapeutic potential of electrical spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and found that over 70% of patients with intractable pain had over 50% pain relief after 1 year of treatment. Thus, SCS is a promising therapeutic intervention that has superior patient outcomes when compared to traditional modalities for the treatment of cLBP. To date, SCS for treatment of cLBP has been delivered via epidural electrodes, requiring neurosurgical implantation. Although, the implantable stimulators have a low rate of adverse events, secondary complications associated with surgical intervention still occur.Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) is a rapidly developing non invasive neuromodulation technique in the field of spinal cord injury. Its application potentiates lumbosacral spinal cord excitability enabling motor functions, (e.g. independent standing, postural control) in patients with chronic complete motor paralysis. Given that epidural and transcutaneous SCS activate similar neuronal networks, tSCS for cLBP treatment may be advantageous due to its non-invasive nature which may also allow for a mass market production and rapid patient availability if tSCS is proven efficacious. In this pilot study we will establish the feasibility of tSCS to acutely improve patient reported outcomes (pain scores) and several objective measures, including sit-to-stand biomechanics, neurophysiological and neuroimaging outcomes.

The overall aim of the present study is to compare two different psychological methods, Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) and Graduated Exposure in vivo (EXP) in the treatment of chronic back pain with regard to effectiveness and improvement of pain related disability. Exploratory research will also be conducted to identify predictors of which patient groups benefit more from which method. This should optimise treatment options and create effective treatment offers for subgroups of pain patients. Exposure therapy is an effective and economical treatment modality and was shown in a previous pilot study to be superior to CBT in reducing perceived movement limitation. CBT, on the other hand, appeared to be more effective in establishing coping strategies. With the help of the current study it should be possible to compare the effectiveness of both treatment methods and, in perspective, to identify those patient groups that benefit from exposure therapy and thus create a tailor-made treatment programme for subgroups of pain patients. A total of 380 patients (age: ≥ 18) with chronic back pain and a sufficient degree of impairment will be included and analysed in the study.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection therapy for low back pain patients. Our hypothesis is that PRP will reduce the pain feeling and benefit for restore of the intervertebral disk.

A Phase 1b study to investigate the efficacy of PP353 compared to placebo in the treatment of chronic low back pain associated with bone oedema.

VETERANS ONLY. Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is common. Most Americans will have at least one episode of low back pain in their lifetimes. Approximately 50% of all US Veterans have chronic pain, and CLBP is the most common type of pain in this population. This study will use a sequential randomized, pragmatic, 2-step comparative effectiveness study design. The main goal is to identify the best approach for treating cLBP using commonly recommended non-surgical and non-pharmacological options. The first step compares continued care and active monitoring (CCAM) to internet-based pain self-management (Pain EASE) and an enhanced physical therapy intervention that combines Pain EASE with tailored exercise and physical activity. Patients who do not have a significant decrease in pain interference (a functional outcome) in Step 1 and those desiring additional treatment will be randomized in Step 2 to yoga, spinal manipulation therapy (SMT), or therapist-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Participants proceeding to randomization in Step 2 will be allowed to exclude up to one of the three Step 2 treatments based on their preferences. The investigators' primary hypothesis for the first treatment step is that an enhanced physical therapy intervention that combines pain self-management education with a tailored exercise program will reduce pain interference greater than internet-based pain self-management alone or CCAM in Veterans with cLBP. The primary outcome is change in pain interference at 3 months, measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain interference subscale. Study participants will be followed for one year after initiation of their final study treatments to assess the durability of treatment effects. The study plans to randomize 2529 patients across 20 centers.

The transverse abdominis (TrA) is the deepest muscle layer of lateral and anterior abdominal wall and also known as a significant component of core stability. Abdominal draw-in maneuver (ADIM) is the main for the strengthening of the deep muscle, however, sufficient activation of TrA by ADIM is limited. Blood flow restriction (BFR) training is a technique combined with low intensity exercise that produces similar results to high intensity training. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to explore whether BFR-assisted ADIM can become a new auxiliary way to train TrA, and whether it can better activate their TrA in patients with low back pain. Low back pain (LBP) is a major health problem with huge economic and social costs. Core muscle weakness is a risk factor for LBP. Past studies have also pointed out that the biggest cause affecting the quality of life and activities of modern people is lower back pain. In modern life, low back pain can be said to be a very common disease. According to past research, there is a 50% to 70% chance that people may have lower back pain in their lifetime, and non-specific low back pain accounts for the majority (90%), the reason why the influence of non-specific low back pain is so great is not only physically but also psychologically. When people perform many functions of daily life, people need the help of the waist. But once the wrong way of effort or posture will lead to more pressure on the spine, leading to greater pain, a strong sense of discomfort will haunt them for a long time. Therefore, the activation and control of TrA is very important because of the relationship between the lateral direction of TrA, so when TrA contracts, it will result in a decrease in waist circumference, an increase in thoracolumbar fascia tension and an increase in intra-abdominal pressure, so it is regarded as the most important stable muscle in the core.In addition, TrA is a special presence in the core muscle group, it can independently contract and like the presence of waist protection to stabilize our spine, but because it is located in the deepest layer, coupled with less muscle activity, it is difficult to effectively activate correctly, so if TrA is not activated or contracted correctly, it may cause non-specific lower back pain.

Analysis of the efficacy, maintenance of efficacy, long-term safety, and investigation of the potential for dependence and abuse and the effect of abrupt drug withdrawal of VER-01 in the treatment of patients with chronic non-specific low back pain when drug treatment is indicated and previous optimised treatments with non-opioid analgesics have not led to sufficient pain relief or were unsuitable due to contraindications or intolerance.

The central objective of research is to examine the feasibility and acceptability of an 8-month single-arm behavioral intervention (i.e., EMPOWER) among overweight/obese middle-aged and older adults with moderate-to-high impact low back pain. Intervention content will focus on standard behavioral weight loss treatment and cognitive-behavioral pain coping therapy with a focus on environmental reward and positive affect.

Failure of RFA has been attributed to technical failure of coagulating the nerve or coagulation of a minimal section of the nerve, allowing for early reinnervation. Consequently, increasing the success rate and duration of relief may require techniques that increase the likelihood of successful nerve ablation over a relevant distance by maximizing lesion size.

This study aims to 1) determine the immediate effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on corticospinal excitability, lumbar multifidus muscle (LM) activation, as well as lumbar stability in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), 2) determine the immediate effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on corticospinal excitability, LM activation, as well as lumbar stability in patients with CLBP, 3) compare the effectiveness of 6-week intervention program among tDCS priming with motor control exercise (MCE), NMES priming with MCE, and MCE alone in patients with CLBP, and 4) determine the associations among corticospinal excitability, LM activation, lumbar stability, movement patterns, and clinical outcomes in patients with CLBP.