Active clinical trials for "Back Pain"

Underwater massage is the more modern variety of massages otherwise known as tangentor, where the temperature of the water of the treatment tub and the mechanical effect of the water jet is utilised. It is typical of chronic low back pain that, after the first painful episode, is repeated at 44-78% of patients. Our goals are the followings: Is the beneficial effect of a Underwater massage therapy addition to a complex physiotherapy comparable to a control group with respect to clinical parameters? How much does the quality of life change in an initial state and how much is it in comparison with the control group?

Modic changes have been associated with low back pain in many clinical studies and are often considered a part of the disc degeneration process. Modic type 1 change is considered an inflammatory process. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections in Modic type-1 changes.

Patients with chronic low back pain may have altered pain processing, making them vulnerable to pain or disability. It can be measured with test like pressure pain threshold, temporal summation or conditioned pain modulation. Manual therapy has shown improve this pain processing variables in other conditions (like knee osteoarthritis or lateral elbow pain), although the quality of the evidence is low in terms of temporal summation and controversial in terms of conditioned pain modulation. There are not studies that had investigated the impact of manual therapy techniques on pain processing in patients with chronic low back pain.

INTRODUCTION: Low back pain is an important health condition with great consequences from the socioeconomic point of view and is associated with high costs for the health system, absenteeism at work and reduced functional performance. It is considered one of the most relevant health problems in the elderly, with point prevalence estimates higher than for other musculoskeletal conditions. It can be defined as any pain between the last ribs and the lower gluteal folds, with or without pain in the lower limbs, manifesting itself acutely, subacutely or chronically. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of the Pilates method versus segmental stabilization in elderly people with chronic low back pain. METHOD: 60 elderly people with chronic low back pain will participate in the study and will be randomized into two groups: Pilates Group (GP) and Segmental Stabilization Group (SG). The two treatments will have 16 individual sessions, twice a week. Pain will be assessed using the visual analogue pain scale; functional disability, using the Oswestry disability index; excessive fear of movement and physical activity, by the Tampa scale of kinesiophobia; level of confidence in the balance for specific activities, by the ABC scale and; activation of the transversus abdominis muscle by pressure biofeedback. Individuals will be evaluated in four moments: before the first session, after the last session, three and six months after the end of the treatment to verify the effects in the medium term. Patient allocation and assessments will be performed by a blind examiner. Data will be analyzed using the ANOVA procedure and Tukey's Multiple Comparison test. The significance level will be 5%. A hipótese deste estudo é que o grupo que realiza exercícios de Pilates obtém ganhos mais obtem que o grupo que realiza exercícios de estabilização segmentar em todas as variáveis ao final do tratamento.

Low back pain is a common health problem where over than half a billion people worldwide suffers from it. In Malaysia, back pain is among the top ten reasons why people see a doctor. Although there are many guidelines available, healthcare professionals still find managing low back pain as challenging. The Decision Support System for Low Back Pain (DeSSBack) has been developed by adopting and re-packaging STaRT system, incorporate with the local clinical practice guidelines and feedback from local experts. It aims to aid healthcare professionals in managing low back pain through a stratified approach. The objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of DeSSBack in improving the management of patients with low back pain in a primary care clinic. We hypothesise that the implementation of DeSSBack will improve the outcomes of low back pain patients including quality of life, emotional state and level of pain. This study protocol presents the rationale and design of a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Objectives: To investigate the effectiveness of instrument-based mobilization compared with manual mobilization in patients with non-specific low back pain (NLBP), in terms of spinal muscle activation, decrease in pain, and improvement in range of motion (ROM). Design: Randomized clinical trial, double blind. Participants and interventions: A total of 66 participants with localized NLBP will be divided into 2 groups matched for sex, age, and body mass index. The intervention group will receive central postero-anterior mobilization with a force of 150 N through physiotherapy instrument mobilization at the level of pain in the lumbar spine. The control group will receive central postero-anterior grade III mobilization through the pisiform grip method at the level of pain in the lumbar spine. Main outcome measures: Measurements will be taken before the intervention, after the 1st session, after the 6th session, and at 4 weeks follow-up. Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging will be done to identify lumbar multifidus (LM) activation through the measurement of muscle thickness at the level of L5-L4 vertebrae, during rest and lower-extremity movement. Each participant will self-rate the pain intensity in the lumbar spine according to the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). The pressure-pain threshold (PPT) will be measured using an algometer. Lumbar ROM will be measured using a dual inclinometer method in flexion and extension. The results will be compared between the intervention and control groups through mixed analysis of variance for LM thickness, lumbar ROM, PPT, and NPRS.

Background: Low back pain, mainly nonspecific (NSLBP) is a major cause of pain and disability worldwide. Exercise therapy (ET) is considered as the first line treatment, and it is one of the treatment modalities most commonly used by physiotherapists. Yet, ET is reliant on the adherence of patients to its various components. Research has demonstrated a positive relationship between adherence to rehabilitation programs and recovery from a variety of musculoskeletal conditions. Therefore, factors that strengthen adherence to ET may increase its efficacy for NSLBP. Converging evidence from recent studies suggest that control and choice may increase adherence to various treatments. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of patient choice and preference on adherence and efficacy of exercise for recovery from NSLBP. Design: Matched case control study. Participants: Fifty subjects with chronic (>3 months) NSLBP. Twenty-five participants will be allocated to exercise by preference group, and 25 aged and gender controls will be allocated to exercise group. Inclusion criteria: Non-specific low back pain (pain or discomfort in the lumbosacral area, with or without symptoms to the lower extremities), diagnosed by general physician or orthopedic surgeon. Age 18-35 Chronic pain (greater than 3 months' duration). Exclusion Criteria: Specific cause for LBP (rheumatic diseases, tumors, fractures, fibromyalgia, previous spinal surgery, pregnancy, low back pain after car or work accidents). Previous (last three years) ET treatment for NSLBP. Regularly performing exercise more than WHO's recommendation: 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic physical activity throughout the week or at least 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity aerobic physical activity throughout the week or an equivalent combination of moderate- and vigorous-intensity activity. Muscle-strengthening activities should be done involving major muscle groups on 2 or more days a week. Procedure: After initial assessment, participants in the intervention group will be asked to choose 3-4 items from a list of 10 general exercises - intended for treatment of low back pain. Each matched participant in the control group will receive the same exercise (without the option to choose). Participants will be instructed to perform their exercises three times a week, for a period of four weeks (12 sessions total). Outcomes: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Henry-Eckert Performance Assessment Tool (HEPA) Both measurements will be taken on the first and last meeting. Additionally, each participant will fill a personal weekly exercise log (selecting between complete \ incomplete \ lack of execution) - sent by e-mail.

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a common reason for which patients are treated with opioids. Because the misuse of prescription opioids has become a serious problem in the Uinted States, finding effective alternative non-pharmaceutical interventions for chronic pain management has become an urgent matter. A phenomenon termed central sensitization (i.e. mal-adaption of the brain) has been hypothesized to be an underlying mechanism for the development of chronic pain, leading to sensory hypersensitivity to extremal stimuli. Therefore, non-invasive brain stimulation, such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) may be an effective intervention to regulate brain excitability, thus reducing chronic pain. However, research has shown inconclusive evidence regarding the rTMS effects on chronic pain reduction, partly due to the heterogeneity of participants in studies to date. Therefore, the primary purpose of this study is to investigate the immediate and short-term effects of rTMS on neurosensory changes (i.e., pain thresholds) in patients with CLBP. The secondary purpuse of the study is to explore the relationship between changes of cortical excitability (TMS parameters) and changes of pain thresholds after the rTMS intervention in patients with CLBP.

This study is to determine the effectiveness of Neural mobilization(NM) technique compared with lumbar stabilization exercise (LSE) and Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (rESWT) in the physical therapy management of chronic low back pain (CLBP) with radiculopathy. Subjects will be randomly assigned into two groups. Group A (NM, LSE and rESWT) and Group B (LSE and rESWT).

The incidence of low back pain (LBP) is increasing and prognostic factors for developing LBP are unclear. Based on questionnaires, different prognostic factors are being explored over time.