Active clinical trials for "Bacteremia"

Hypothesis: The use of daptomycin to treat nosocomial or healthcare-associated bacteremia due to methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) would increase the proportion of patients whose blood cultures are sterilized after 72 hours by 15% relative to vancomycin and would improve treatment safety. Hypothesis: for MRSA nosocomial or healthcare related bacteriemia treatment, the use of daptomycin versus vancomycin would increase by 15% the proportion of patients with sterilized blood cultures at 72 hours and would increase the treatment safety. Primary objective: To study the efficacy of daptomycin compared to vancomycin on the sterilization of blood cultures after 72 hours of therapy.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of daptomycin treatment versus vancomycin treatment in the treatment of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSI) due to isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) (i.e. > or equal to 1.5 ug/ml) in terms of reducing all-cause mortality. Our secondary aim is to compare clinical failure rates of daptomycin treatment versus vancomycin treatment and to compare time to microbiological clearance in patients treated with daptomycin versus those treated with vancomycin. Our primary hypothesis is that Daptomycin treatment is superior to vancomycin treatment in reducing mortality from BSIs due to MRSA with high vancomycin MIC from 25% to 10%.

This study will compare dalbavancin to standard of care (SOC) antibiotic therapy for the completion of therapy in patients with complicated bacteremia or infective endocarditis.

Evaluate the efficacy of a sequential regimen of 14 days in patients with catheter-related bacteremia by S. aureus methicillin-susceptible, selected based on a pre-established clinical and microbiological criteria.

This is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial of telavancin versus standard IV therapy control (e.g., vancomycin, daptomycin, anti-staphylococcal penicillin (PCN), or cefazolin) in the treatment of subjects with complicated Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) bacteremia and SA right-sided infective endocarditis (SA-RIE).

This study will treat hemodialysis patients who have a central catheter that is thought to be infected with a specific bacteria (Gram positive bacteria).

Getting the right dose of antibiotic promptly is an important part of treating infections. Unfortunately, when an infection is severe (sepsis) the body changes how it processes antibiotics. Consequently, some people with severe infection retain antibiotics for too long (risking adverse effects), whilst others excrete antibiotics too quickly (risking under-treatment). Mathematical models can help researchers understand drug handling variability (known as pharmacokinetics) between people. These models require very accurate information about drug administration and drug blood concentration timings. Researchers usually rely on someone recording these timings, but recording errors can make models inaccurate. We would like to understand if using data from routinely used electronic drug infusion devices (recording the exact time of administration) can improve the accuracy of pharmacokinetic models. We intend to investigate this with an antibiotic (vancomycin) that clinicians already routinely monitor blood concentrations for. Adults and children treated at St George's Hospital intensive care units will be invited to participate in the study which will last for 28-days within a 14-month period. Participants will donate a small amount of extra blood and provide researchers access to their clinical data. Blood will be taken at special times during vancomycin treatment from lines placed as part of standard treatment, minimising any pain or distress. There will be no other changes to patient's treatment. In the future, data from this study might help change the way we dose antibiotics. The National Institute for Health and Care Research and Pharmacy Research UK are supporting the study with funding.

A Phase 1, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Escalating Study to Examine the Safety and Tolerability of Single Intravenous Doses of CF-301 in Healthy Subjects.

Prolonged antibiotic use in preterm neonates has significant consequences on the developing intestinal microbiome, metabolome and host response, predisposing the neonate to various major morbidities, including necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), late-onset sepsis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), and mortality. The hypothesis is that early and prolonged antibiotic use in preterm neonates has significant consequences on the developing intestinal microbiome, metabolome and host response, predisposing the neonate to various major morbidities. It is possible that the effect of this widespread antibiotic use outweighs the potential benefits. This study will randomize preterm infants born at less than 33 weeks gestation to either pre-emptive antibiotics or no-pre-emptive antibiotics. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the risks and benefits of current practice to determine optimal levels of antibiotic use that protects the babies from infection with minimal effect on the microbiome and subsequent adverse outcomes related to overuse of antibiotics.

Klebsiella pneumonia, inhabitant of the digestive tract, is a frequent nosocomial pathogen. It is currently the fourth most common cause of pneumonia and fifth most common cause of bacteremia in intensive care patients (1-3). The aim of the present randomized controlled trial is to assess the efficacy of non-absorbable oral antibiotics in the eradication of the KPC carrier state.