Active clinical trials for "Pressure Ulcer"

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a bioelectric wound dressing, used in conjunction with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT), is effective in the treatment of diabetic and pressure ulcers of the foot.

Many spinal cord injury (SCI) and otherwise debilitated patients develop pressure ulcers over the course of their injury or disease. Despite enhanced wound care management, many pressure ulcers do not heal completely and require surgical myocutaneous rotational flap coverage. Even then they often recur. The objectives of this study are: (1) to conduct a controlled comparative study of the effectiveness of subatmospheric pressure dressing (SPD) in healing pressure ulcers versus conventional saline wet-to-moist dressing techniques; (2) to establish indications and contra-indications for use of SPD In treating pressure ulcers; and (3) to develop a noninvasive, clinically usable optical digitizer and associated software for measurement of wound geometry for standardized quantitative assessment and longitudinal monitoring of wound healing.

The primary objective of this post market clinical follow-up (PMCF) investigation is to evaluate performance and safety of Exufiber when used as intended in Stage II-IV pressure ulcers (PU).

The primary objective of these case series is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the KLOX BioPhotonic System as adjunctive therapy to Standard Of Care (SOC) in patients with stage II or III pressure ulcers.

The coprecipitation method was used to prepare hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin complexed with insulin (HPβCD-I) by mixing insulin with hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin (HPβCD) in the molar ratio of 1:5 with the addition of 10 mL of purified water for every 100 mg of the complex. After complete dissolution of the material, the mixture was stirred for 30 min at room temperature (25°C), then left to rest for 60 min and lyophilized. The gel was prepared by dispersing the Carbopol 940® polymer in a known amount of purified water. Under mild heating the methylparaben (0.02%, w/v), propylparaben (0.01%, w/v) and propylene glycol were dissolved and incorporated in the dispersion of Carbopol 940® and left to rest for a period of 12h. After this time, the prepared gel was stirred and pH corrected to a range of 5.0 to 7.0 with triethanolamine. A set amount of insulin and the HPβCD-I complex were incorporated into the control gel for the preparation of other formulations. A randomized, double-blind, prospective clinical trial was conducted from March 2013 to April 2014 at the Hospital Universitário Regional de Maringá (HUM), Paraná, Brazil, in order to determine the safety and efficacy of gel in patients hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit. Hyperglycemic volunteers and those with pressure ulcers other than grade II were excluded from the study. Grade II pressure ulcers were selected as they are a superficial lesion, with little tissue loss, and allow easy visualization of healing. A letter of free and informed consent was obtained. The study was conducted with each patient for a period of 15 days. The volunteers were divided equally into three groups A, B and C, with each group being formed by five volunteers (n=5). Group A was randomly selected for treatment with gel with HPβCD-I complex, group B for treatment with gel with insulin, and group C with the control gel. Blood glucose tests were performed in order to assess whether the insulin complexed or otherwise with HPβCD could cause an increase in the rate of insulin in the blood in patients, leading to hypoglycemia. An identical standardized procedure for gel placement was used for all patients. Initially, the pressure ulcer was cleaned with saline. With the aid of a paper ruler, the ulcer was measured and photographed, as the ruler included the date and the initials of the patient. After measuring, a quantity of 5 grams of gel was placed on the pressure ulcer and covered with sterile gauze and a transparent film. The curative was changed once a day during the treatment period, unless there was leakage of fluid, contamination, or signs of infection. Every three days the pressure ulcers of all patients were measured and photographed again, resulting in a total of six measurements per patient. The photos of pressure ulcers were evaluated for measurement of pressure ulcers and any kind of irritation. At the end of this stage, the properly gathered study data was interpreted using the analysis software Mobile Wound Analyzer® (MOWA). Data was evaluated by variance analysis (ANOVA), and means were compared with the Tukey test (p < 0.05) using the software Statistica 8.0/2008 (Stat Soft Inc., Tulsa, USA). Mixed model repeated measures methodology with some covariance structures was adopted for statistical analysis of the clinical trial (p < 0.05). The Statistical Analysis System (SAS) for Windows, version 9.3 (SAS Inc., Chicago, IL) program was used for statistical analysis.

Study objective The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the investigational device, ULSD-12D, as Compared to the comparator, SONOCA-180, in chronic wound.

Patients who have at least one stage 3 or 4 PI and are admitted to a participating treating facility will be candidates for study enrollment. Patients must provide written informed consent. Standard care for their admitted condition will be provided for the patients except for support surface selection, laboratory blood tests, PI measurement(s) by the 3-D camera measurement tool, and added pain and patient satisfaction assessments. Clinical assessments will be recorded weekly as described below. Patients will be followed until discharge from the LTACH or until 1) they require a different mattress for their admitted condition; or 2) reach a maximum of 12 weeks in the LTACH. At study discontinuation, a clinical general assessment of the quality of improvement of the PIs will be recorded.

It is reported that the distribution of contrast medium had an obvious correlation with the extent of sensory analgesia after injection of LA. Our previous study showed that different posture (prone vs. lateral decubitus) resulted in different degree of contrast medium spread. We supposed that differences of epidural pressure between diverse postures might be one factor contributing those differences of epidurography. This study was designed to compare the epidural pressure and extent of spread of epidurography between prone and lateral decubitus position

Multi-center, prospective, interventional, uncontrolled open-label study evaluating the real-life use of KLOX LumiHeal BioPhotonic System in chronic wounds management (venous leg ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, pressure ulcers).

This study aims to compare the effects of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy and wet-to-dry dressing on Stages 3 and 4 pressure injuries, and to investigate the consistency of Three-Dimensional Wound Measurement Device findings with Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing Tool scores. This study is a randomized controlled trial. A total of 30 patients with Stages 3 and 4 pressure injuries were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups: the experimental group or Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy group and the control or wet-to-dry dressing group. All patients received 3 rounds of treatment. Data were collected with a Patient Identification Form, Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing Tool and the findings of Three-Dimensional Wound Measurement Device. We found that granulation tissue formation was more significant in the experimental group (p < .05), and that there was more significant wound shrinkage (p < .05) with a more significant decrease in the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing Tool scores (p < .05). The wounds were assessed with the Tool and the Three-Dimensional Wound Measurement device. Device measurements were found to be correlated with Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing Tool Tool findings (p < .05) There was a significant correlation between device-measured granulation findings and PUSH Tool score results of the experimental group's third measurements (p < .05). We conclude that Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy is an effective treatment method for pressure injuries, and Three-Dimensional Wound Measurement device is an usable wound assessment tool.