Active clinical trials for "Mental Disorders"

This study aims at evaluating the effectiveness of a mobile phone based intervention to prevent and manage mental health problems in healthcare workers at the frontline against COVID-19 in Spain. The intervention will consist in psychoeducation, delivered via a mobile App. Participants will be followed up during two weeks. The primary outcome will be symptomatology of depression, anxiety or stress.

Recovery-oriented approach has been the main trend in mental health field. However, few recovery-oriented programs are available in Taiwan, and many Taiwanese people with mental illness don't understand the concepts of recovery. A program which provides recovery knowledge and assists in setting recovery goals is beneficial for Taiwanese people with mental illness. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a recovery program for people with mental illness.

This study determines the effectiveness of the interviewing based on salutogenic approach on the sense of coherence and resilience of people with schizophrenia. For this, while the intervention group was subjected to salutogenic approach-based interview consisting of 16 sessions twice a week. The control group continued their routine activities and was interviewed face-to-face 5 times.

Twenty percent of all children struggle with mental health challenges, most of whom will remain unrecognized, unsupported, and unable to access quality care. A major barrier to closing this care gap is a lack of evidence-based delivery models that are contextualized to low-resource settings. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of teacher-delivered transdiagnostic mental healthcare for children in rural primary schools of India. Implementation process and context will also be examined. This is a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trials (SW-CRCT), with an embedded qualitative evaluation, that will be conducted in low-cost private primary schools in the rural Darjeeling Himalayas of India. The primary outcome is children's mental health status measured by the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA) Teacher Report Form and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include: 1) daily functioning measured by the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System (ABAS-3), 2) academic achievement measured by the Annual Status of Education Report (ASER) tool, and 3) school attendance. Outcome data will be collected at baseline and endline in each academic year. The primary analysis for each outcome is the mean score at endline for children receiving targeted intervention (Tealeaf: Mansik Swastha or Enhanced Usual Care) between trial arms. The primary hypothesis is that children receiving mental health struggles receiving the Tealeaf intervention will demonstrate improved mental health compared to children with mental health struggles receiving enhanced usual care. The goal of the embedded qualitative study will be to explore the effect of cultural and social context on intervention implementation and efficacy, how and why changes may occur, and the culture, context, and community in which the study occurs. This qualitative research will be driven by the scientific standard of advanced qualitative methods (ethnography and participant observation). This trial may offer a new approach to caring for children with mental health struggles that is potentially scalable in India as it empowers existing classroom teachers.

This cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trial will test the effectiveness and feasibility of embedding the Tele-Savvy intervention, a psychoeducational program for family and other informal caregivers of older adults living in the community with Alzheimer's disease and related dementia (ADRD), in two health care systems/clinical sites: UConn Health in Farmington, Connecticut, and Emory Healthcare in Atlanta, Georgia.

GET PrEPD-Psychiatry is a mixed-methods, developmental study to adapt a shared decision making (SDM) intervention to be specific for psychiatry decisions (Aim 1, previously completed), evaluate its feasibility and acceptability (Aim 2), and examine potential mechanisms of change and preliminary outcomes (Aim 3) of this innovative intervention to increase SDM and self-management for adults with serious mental illness (SMI). In line with National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) priorities, we are examining whether GET PrEPD-Psychiatry engages the target mechanisms that putatively underlie the intervention (i.e., patient activation and communication self-efficacy; Aim 3). Aim 1 used approximately 200 deidentified transcripts from our prior study of SDM in psychiatry to cull language used in decision-making. These conversations were then used to program the Virtual Provider to represent common interactions and decisions in psychiatric visits. Iterative testing of the use of the Virtual Provider has been completed and feedback was obtained from our psychiatry consultants to refine the program. For Aim 2, we will recruit up to 40 patients to participate in GET PrEPD-Psychiatry (4 weekly goal setting/coaching sessions, coupled with Virtual Provider training and practice). We will assess participant satisfaction and utility ratings, as well as track their use (frequency and time-on-task) of the Virtual Provider program. For Aim 3, we will follow enrolled patient participants, interviewing them at baseline and approximately 3 months later. We hypothesize that participants will have significantly 1) improved mechanisms of change, demonstrated by increases in self-reported activation and communication self-efficacy, 2) improved SDM, and 3) improved self-management and recovery attitudes. The Narrative Evaluation of Intervention Interview (NEII), completed at approximately 3 months, will be used as a qualitative interview guide to understand the acceptability and impact of the intervention.

The purpose of this study is 1) to evaluate whether emergency department-initiated medically assisted treatment with Buprenorphine/Naloxone in patients presenting with opioid use disorder will produce positive outcomes at 1 week, 3 months and 6 months after treatment initiation, and 2) to determine whether emergency department referrals to a bridge clinic improve outcomes relative to direct referrals to a local waivered physician.

The objective is to test the effectiveness of a village-led microfinance program, Pigs for Peace, on health, household economic stability, and reintegration of trauma survivors to family and community. The five-year experimental trial will use mixed-methods to address the following aims: Determine the effectiveness of a village-led microfinance program on participants health and reintegration in intervention households compared to participants in delayed control households. Health and reintegration will be measured at baseline and six, twelve, and 18-months post-baseline using self-report in both intervention and delayed control groups. We hypothesize that at six, twelve and 18 months post-baseline participants in intervention households will have improved health and increased reintegration to families in comparison to participants in control households. Determine the effectiveness of a village-led microfinance program on household economic stability in intervention households compared to delayed control villages. Household economic stability will be measured at baseline and six, twelve and 18 months post- baseline using self-report in both intervention and control households. We hypothesize that at six, twelve and 18-months post-baseline the intervention households will have improved household economic stability in comparison to control households. Examine the role of a village-led microfinance program on village-level health, economics, stigma and reintegration of survivors and their families in intervention and delayed control villages. Village members (n=5 in each village, n=50 total) will complete a baseline and 18 month post-baseline qualitative interview to examine the role of microfinance on village-level health, economics, stigma and reintegration in both intervention and control households.

In 2010, 11.5% of all Gulf War-II Veterans were unemployed; that figure rose to 15.2% in January 2011 and continues to grow as the number of Veterans from recent wars increases. The prevalence of mental illness among Veterans is also notable; estimates range from 31% to nearly 37% for any psychiatric disorder, and over half of these Veterans are diagnosed with more than one psychiatric condition. In addition, empirical evidence suggests that some mental disorders are more prevalent in Veterans than in the general population. Linking unemployment and mental illness, a recent study found that 65% of Veterans using VA healthcare were unemployed, and compared to employed Veterans, the unemployed were more likely to have depression, bipolar disorder, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), schizophrenia, or substance use disorders. Vocational dysfunction was reported most often in disabled Veterans with schizophrenia, PTSD, and substance use disorders. Not surprisingly, this study also found that unemployed Veterans had significantly lower income than employed persons. Similarly, a large study focusing specifically on Veterans with PTSD concluded that vocational dysfunction is a notable problem among this group, as they were significantly less likely to be employed after participating in VA work programs compared with participants without the disorder. Because most individuals with mental illness desire to work in regular competitive employment, the nationwide problem of unemployment among Veterans with mental illness is particularly troubling. The VA is addressing this need by implementing supported employment (SE), a psychiatric rehabilitation approach that provides individual vocational assistance to Veterans with mental illness. While the SE model is empirically validated and SE programs have been shown to achieve partial success in improving employment outcomes, a sizable proportion of individuals, 40% or more, remain unemployed. A further challenge is job retention; Veterans with mental illness who obtain jobs frequently struggle to maintain them long-term. Even in the context of high quality, evidence-based vocational services, most studies show only modest job retention of a few months, and consequently, frequent job losses and inconsistent vocational functioning remain a substantial and unsolved problem. Rationale: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) effectively reduces symptoms across a range of psychiatric conditions; however, its benefit to functioning remains less well understood. Work functioning has received little empirical attention in the CBT domain. Despite research evidence suggesting that maladaptive thoughts about oneself and expectations about the ability to work interfere with work success, no CBT programs have been developed specifically targeting vocational themes with the goal of improving competitive work outcomes. Further, a recent paper outlined needed avenues of future study in the SE domain; Drake and Bond (2011) state that cognitive strategies may be a fruitful area to develop to help "nonresponder" consumers with mental illness who struggle with vocational dysfunction despite high quality vocational assistance. The goal of the current project is to address this gap and the serious problem of unemployment in Veterans with mental illness by pilot testing the CBT for work success program (CBTw) and assessing key employment outcomes before and after the intervention, and six months after conclusion of the intervention. Specific Aims: Aim 1: Test the preliminary efficacy of the CBTw program on key Veteran employment and psychosocial outcomes utilizing a pre/post design. Aim 2: Further assess the feasibility of the program, including recruitment, retention rates, and program participation rates. Aim 3: Gauge effect sizes in preparation for a larger randomized controlled trial examining the effectiveness of the CBT program in routine practice settings

The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness of the Progressive Goal Attainment Program (PGAP) in improving employment outcomes and community engagement among U.S. veterans with disabilities.