Active clinical trials for "Hypotension"

Jugular vein collapsibility index and shock indices (Shock index, Modified Shock Index, Diastolic Shock Index) may be useful in estimating post spinal hypotension in cesarean section operations. Evaluation on the accuracy and effectiveness of these indices can contribute to the early diagnosis and management of hypotension. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of shock indices in predicting the possibility of post spinal hypotension in cesarean section operations.

Cesarean Section (CS) is a common obstetric surgery that can be performed by both general or regional anaesthetic techniques. Hypotension is the most common complication of spinal anaesthesia, its incidence varying from 70% to 80 %, if severe, it can result in serious perinatal adverse outcomes, such as maternal nausea and vomiting, fetal acidosis and may be an important contributory factor for maternal death related to regional anaesthesia.

Studies have shown that the clinical application of ultrasound to measure large blood vessels related parameters has been widely used to assess the blood volume status of patients, with the advantages of simple, non-invasive and non-radioactive, etc. However, these current methods using by ultrasound technology such as diameter and collapsibility index of the inferior vena cava parameters cannot fully reflect the blood volume, the sensitivity and specificity of predicting hypotension after induction are not very satisfied. Recent reports have demonstrated that respirophasic variation in carotid artery blood flow peak velocity (ΔVpeak) and carotid corrected flow time (FTc) can noninvasively assess patient responsiveness to fluids. Thus, we speculate that the combined measurement of the parameters of the carotid artery and the inferior vena cava may more comprehensively and accurately assess the patient's blood volume status, thereby accurately predicting the occurrence of hypotension after induction of anesthesia.

Fluid-unresponsive hypotension needing cardiotropic drug treatment is a serious complication in very preterm neonates with suspected late-onset sepsis (LOS; defined as culture positive or negative bloodstream infection or necrotizing enterocolitis occurring >48 hours of age). In Canada, ~250 very preterm neonates receive cardiotropic drugs for LOS related fluid-unresponsive hypotension every year; of these ~35-40% die. Unlike for adult patients, there is little evidence to inform practice. While several medications are used by clinicians, the most frequently used medications are Dopamine (DA) and Norepinephrine (NE). However, their relative impact on patient outcomes and safety is not known resulting in significant uncertainty and inter- and intra-unit variability in practice. Conducting large randomized trials in this subpopulation can be operationally challenging and expensive. Comparative effectiveness research (CER), is a feasible alternative which can generate high-quality real-world evidence using real-world data, by comparing the impact of different clinical practices. Aim: To conduct a national CER study, using a pragmatic clinical trial design, in conjunction with the existing infrastructure of the Canadian Neonatal Network to identify the optimal management of hypotension in very preterm neonates with suspected LOS. Objective: To compare the relative effectiveness and safety of pharmacologically equivalent dosages of DA versus NE for primary pharmacotherapy for fluid-unresponsive hypotension in preterm infants born ≤ 32 weeks gestational age with suspected LOS. Hypothesis: Primary treatment with NE will be associated with a lower mortality Methods: This CER project will compare management approach at the unit-level allowing inclusion of all eligible patients admitted during the study period. 15 centers in Canada have agreed to standardize their practice. All eligible patients deemed circulatory insufficient will receive fluid therapy (minimum 10-20 cc/kg). If hypotension remains unresolved: Dopamine Units: start at 5mics/kg/min, increase every 16-30 minutes by 5 mics/kg/min to a maximum dose of 15 mics/kg/min or adequate response Norepinephrine Units: start at 0.05 mics/kg/min, increase every 16-30 minutes by 0.05 mics/kg/min to maximum dose of 0.15/mics/kg/min or adequate response

This is a prospective, randomized control trial comparing norepinephrine versus phenylephrine for vasopressor support in patients undergoing elective spinal fusion surgery.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the potency between prophylactic norepinephrine and phenylephrine boluses for postspinal anesthesia hypotension in patients with severe preeclampsia during caesarean section.

This study is being conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of VBI-S in elevating the blood pressure of septic shock patients with absolute or relative hypovolemia.

Intraoperative hypotension (IOH) is a sudden clinical phenomenon that occurs frequently during general anesthesia. Prevention of IOH has been linked to reduced postoperative organ damage and decreased incidence of perioperative complications. Oncological patients with reduced preoperative physiological reserves may be especially vulnerable to IOH deleterious effects, especially when exposed to prolonged surgical time increase, as it is the case for patients undergoing pancreatic surgery. The investigators aim to study introduction of a new technology able to predict hypotensive events (Hypotension Predictive Index, HPI Acumen™) in terms of its effects on IOH occurrence and burden in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery. The investigators will enroll patients before and after the introduction of HPI monitoring. Further, differences in postoperative outcomes and perioperative complications between before and after populations will be investigated.

Cirrhotic patients with sepsis represent a very sick subset of patients and septic shock in such patients is associated with high mortality. Early initiation of intravenous fluids and antibiotics is the key to management in these patients. The choice of fluid in cirrhotic patients with sepsis induced hypotension has been studied in the past. The choice of fluid, crystalloid vs colloid, for resuscitation in such patients has been a matter of debate. In the previous study, the ALPS trial, 20% albumin use was associated with a better reversal of hypotension but was associated with an increased incidence of pulmonary complications and 5% albumin was better when compared to normal saline(FRISC study) for fluid resuscitation. No study in the past has evaluated 5% albumin against 20% albumin in combination with crystalloid. Investigator aim to study the efficacy and safety of 20% albumin with plasmalyte against 5 % albumin for fluid resuscitation in cirrhotic patients with sepsis induced hypotension.

This study was a single-center, prospective, 2-year observational cohort study. The study subjects were ICU patients requiring vasopressor drugs and requiring sedation. According to the use of ciprofol or propofol in the treatment plan (determined by the doctor in charge according to the condition of the subjects), they were divided into groups: ciprofol group and propofol group. A total of 456 subjects were planned to be enrolled, including 304 subjects in the cyclopofol group and 152 subjects in the propofol group. The data of this study were obtained by extracting the routine clinical diagnosis and treatment records of the enrolled subjects.