Active clinical trials for "Breast Neoplasms"

The purpose of this study is to determine whether ETBX-021 is safe and effective in the treatment of unresectable locally advanced or metastatic HER2-low-expressing breast cancer.

This research protocol is studying the accuracy of the sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure in breast cancer patients who have cancer cells in the lymph nodes in the armpit (axilla) who have received chemotherapy or endocrine therapy prior to having surgery (neoadjuvant therapy).

The study is a prospective, randomized phase II clinical trial, to compare the efficacy and safety profiles of standard chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy followed by capecitabine as prolonged postoperative adjuvant treatment for breast cancer patients.

This research study is studying a PET imaging tracer as a possible means of imaging breast cancer. The imaging agent involved in this study is: -[11C]Martinostat (called C-eleven-Martinostat)

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of Pyrotinib Combined With Etoposide to Treat HER2-positive Advanced Breast Cancer

This study is a single-arm, prospective, open label clinical study for evaluating the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pyrotinib and trastuzumab plus Vinorelbine given as neoadjuvant treatment in Trastuzumab-refractory HER2 positive early stage or locally advanced breast cancer.

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib combined with trastuzumab and abraxane in HER2-positive MBC with brain metastasis.

There is a trend that breast surgery can be done with peripheral nerve blockade and intravenous sedation, which reduces the side effects of general anesthesia such as nausea and vomiting, intubation discomfort and postoperative pain. The distribution of breast nerves is complex. Common nerve block methods are paravertebral blocks and pectoral nerve blocks. By monitoring the patient's heart rate variability change and measuring the patient's parasympathetic tone, the analgesic drug can be administered according to the patient's individual differences to avoid insufficient or excessive analgesic dose. The aim of this proposal is a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial is designed to evaluate changes in analgesia nociception index (ANI), surgical pleth index (SPI), postoperative opioid demand, and pain scores between patients who received regional anesthesia and those without in breast surgery patients under non-intubated surgery.

Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer is not usually considered curative. Recent retrospective studies have demonstrated that resection of the breast tumor in patients with primary metastatic breast cancer is associated with a significant improvement of the prognosis. In all these aforementioned studies, the decision to perform surgery could have been influenced by favorable prognostic factors, such as younger age, the presence of only one metastatic site, or good response to systemic therapy. To rule out the impact of potential confounders, most studies adjusted for age, tumor size, number and sites of metastases and hormone receptor status. In addition, some studies also adjusted for comorbidity or surgical margins. For example, in the study of Bafford et al., the benefit of surgery seemed confined to patients operated upon before diagnosis of metastatic disease and there was no survival advantage in patients who received an operation of the breast tumor after the diagnosis of the metastatic disease had taken place. This phenomenon was referred to as the stage migration bias. In a study by Leung et al., the benefit from surgery disappeared in the multivariate analysis when taking into account the use of chemotherapy. Finally, in a study by Cady et al. coding errors in the retrospectively collected dataset were found to explain part of the survival advantage. 4Therefore, this randomized controlled trial (RCT) has been initiated. In the literature, several retrospective studies noted that 35-60% of patients with metastatic cancer at the time of diagnosis received local treatment of primary lesions, which resulted in a positive impact on survival. However, an analysis of 16,023 patients presenting with stage IV disease and an intact primary tumor compared outcomes between patients having surgery of the primary tumor to negative margins or no surgery. In a multivariate analysis adjusting for known prognostic factors, surgery reduced the HR for death to 0.61 (95% CI = 0.58 to 0.65). Multiple other retrospective studies from single institutions, registries, and population-based cohorts have confirmed this initial observation, but it is uncertain whether these studies reflect a real benefit for surgery or consistent selection bias. Three prospective randomized trials are examining the role of surgery in patients presenting with stage IV disease and an intact primary tumor. While awaiting the results of these trials, it is not known precisely how or when to integrate such surgical management into a standard medical therapy for metastatic breast cancer or which patients, in particular, are most likely to benefit from such treatment. 1 The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of surgery of the primary tumor in breast cancer patients with distant metastatic disease at initial diagnosis. According to the controversies in previous studies design of a study with the least confounding factor to decrease the bias seems to be necessary.

The "Hyperbaric OxygeN therapy on brEast cancer patients with late radiation toxicity" (HONEY) trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of HBOT on late radiation toxicity in breast cancer patients using the trial within cohorts (TwiCs) design.