Active clinical trials for "Asthma"

The study aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of FF/UMEC/VI compared with FF/VI via ELLIPTA® inhaler in Chinese participants with inadequately controlled asthma. ELLIPTA is a registered trademark of GlaxoSmithKline group of companies.

Emerging evidence suggests that regular exercise can complement medical treatment for asthma. Furthermore there are no specific recommendation on how plan exercise training. To the best of current knowledge, there isn't enough evidence of the effect of a strength training in subjects with asthma. Therefore the aim of this study is to evaluate the short and long term effects of a strength and endurance training compared with endurance training alone in subjects with asthma.

The investigators have previously confirmed a clinical hunch that women with asthma have difficulties in becoming pregnant. The investigators found increased time to pregnancy (TTP) in women with asthma compared to non-asthmatic women (55 vs 33 months, p<0.001), furthermore, women with asthma had less successful pregnancies following fertility treatment (39.6 vs 60.4%, p=0.002). Treatment with omalizumab stabilizes the eosinophilic disease, through the systemic and most likely the anti-inflammatory pathways, which indicate a promising possibility to increase pregnancy rate. In a small real-life study in 2017, 5 patients with eosinophilic asthma who underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF), were treated with omalizumab prior to embryo transplantation; three out of the five women became pregnant. Lastly, the two remaining patients had several treatments with omalizumab, but did not become pregnant. This real-life study calls for further investigation. By targeting systemic inflammation with omalizumab treatment the aim is to increase asthma control before and during pregnancy. A treatment strategy aiming at improving overall inflammatory control may increase fertility, but also reduce well known maternal and perinatal adverse pregnancy outcomes such as pregnancy loss, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, low-birth weight, small for gestational age (SGA), preterm delivery. Study design: A randomized control trial with omalizumab and placebo, stratified for blood eosinophil count, is therefore needed. A randomized, double blinded, parallel group, study to evaluate the difference between omalizumab (O) and placebo (P) on pregnancy rate in patients with atopic asthma.Treatment schedule: After collection of material (blood samples, sputum, secretion of the vagina, secretion of the rectum, microbiota) 6th day (±1 day) of the menstrual cycle, the patients will be randomized in either the omalizumab group or the placebo group. No collection of material will be done at the time of enrollment, as this will be on different time of the female cycles. The treatment is initiated with one injection with weight and serum-immunglobulin E balanced omalizumab or one injection placebo. After omalizumab treatment at ovulation it will again be collected material (blood samples, sputum, secretion of the vagina, secretion of the rectum, secretion of the uterus, microbiota). If no pregnancy has occurred after first IVF cycle, this will be repeated for 3 consecutive IVF cycles in total or until pregnancy has occurred. Outcome: The primary out-come is efficacy of omalizumab, compared to placebo, in increasing pregnancy rate in females with asthma. Secondary out-comes are changes in the inflammation in lungs/systemic/uterus, change in microbiota in the uterus and lungs, pregnancy loss, asthma control and biomarkers in the blood/lungs/uterus.

This study will evaluate the effect of CYP2C19 and ABCB1 genes on pharmacokinetics of lansoprazole in children with mild gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and uncontrolled asthma. It will determine if genotype-guided lansoprazole dosing of lansoprazole improves GER and asthma control.

The aim is to test the efficacy of AIM2ACT and long-term maintenance of treatment effects in a fully-powered randomized controlled trial with 160 early adolescents with poorly controlled persistent asthma, ages 12-15 years, and a caregiver

A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Immunotherapy in Patients With Rhinitis With or Without Mild to Moderate Asthma Sensitized to cupressaceae and grasses.

Prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of efficacy and safety with subcutaneous immunotherapy in patients with mild to moderate rhinitis / rhinoconjunctivitis with or without mild to moderate asthma sensitized to grasses and olive

The purpose of the study is to investigate the effect of physiotherapeutical instructions on dysfunctional breathing in children and adolescents with or without asthma. Children and adolescents with dysfunctional breathing, are invited to participate in the intervention study. Participants are stratified by asthma diagnose status and randomized to physiotherapy or standard care. Participants are followed a year after the intervention, to compare the development in asthma control ( if asthma) and quality of life.

This is a phase 1, first-in-human (FIH), multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of CSL311 in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma. The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety and tolerability of single ascending doses (SAD) and multiple ascending doses (MAD) of CSL311.

In this study, the investigators hypothesize that the reference product (SalbR/Ventolin) is more effective than SalbG (Salbutamol Sandoz) at improving the lung function in children with asthma, and that this difference increases alongside the severity of the airway resistance. (Null hypothesis: There is no difference). This could be explained by different properties and deposition of the aerosol. Purpose of this research: Rejecting the null hypothesis. This is based on the answers to the questions below. Research questions: Is there a difference between the increase in FEV1 (and FVC) after 100 μg SalbG versus FEV1 after 100 μg SalbR in children aged 4-14 years with insufficient asthma control? (primary question) Is there a difference in the subjective feeling of the children after inhalation with 100 μg SalbR and after 100 μg SalbG, measured with a VAS score? Is the increase in FEV1 (and FVC) in children with asthma between 4-14 years of age with insufficient asthma control after inhalation of 400 μg SalbR different than after inhalation of 400 μg SalbG? Is there a difference in the subjective feeling of the children after inhalation with 400 μg SalbR and after 400 μg SalbG, measured with a VAS score?