Tumor Deposits in Cancer Colon
Cancer of ColonAssessment of correlation between tumor deposits and clinicopathological characteristics of colorectal cancer. Detection of association between tumor deposits and stage of colorectal cancer. Evaluate the relationship between tumor deposits and prognosis of colorectal cancer patient.
Ex-vivo Sentinel Lymph Node in Stage I-II Colon Cancer: Kappa Analysis With Immunochemistry and...
Colon CancerLymph Node1 moreUnmask Trial aims to evaluate the Kappa concordance between immunochemistry and molecular biology to detecting cancer cells in sentinel lymph node in patients undergoing colectomy for non metastatic colon cancer.
Metabolomic Phenotyping After Surgery for Colon Cancer: Study of Novel Predictive Biomarkers
Colon CancerPredictive biomarkers are needed to identify those patients with higher risk of recurrence after surgery for colon cancer with curative intent. Our main objective is to determine a metabolite profile in blood plasma from patients operated from colorectal cancer that can be associated with the oncologic outcome and be validated as predictive biomarkers in future studies. A secondary objective is to study the glycolytic metabolism of colon cancer cell lines treated with plasma samples from the same patients. In particular, to validate the increased utilization of lactate by tumor cells as a metabolic substrate using postoperative human samples. Patients with colorectal cancer that have undergone surgical resection will be included. Plasma samples will be obtained before surgery and the 4th day and the 3rd, 6th, 12th, and 18th months after surgery. Metabolic profiles in plasma samples will be determined using a kit that allows the quantification of 180 metabolites by mass spectrometry. A clinical follow up will be maintained for at least 2 years to identify tumor recurrences.
Evaluation of Stool Tagging for Improved Patient Compliance
Colon CancerPolypsComputed tomography (CT) colonography has gained widespread multi-disciplinary interest as an evolving noninvasive colorectal screening examination, with the potential of improved patient compliance. The investigator's prior work demonstrated that the bowel preparation was the least tolerable aspect of colorectal evaluation when compared to the CT colonography and optical colonoscopy procedures. Stool tagging could provide a more gentle and efficient bowel preparation, with fewer false positives due to retained stool-mimicking polyps. The researchers hypothesize that image quality and patient preference will vary with stool tagging concentration and dosing schedule. The researchers propose to evaluate specific stool tagging protocols with the following aims: AIM 1: Perform a randomized trial of three specific stool tagging protocols using barium and iodine at CT colonography in a well-characterized cohort of patients undergoing colorectal evaluation. AIM 2: Analyze the CT colonography and optical colonoscopy data to assess differences across stool tagging protocols for the outcome measures of patient preference, image quality in the presence of tagging, and diagnostic reader performance. The researchers will use specific variations in stool tagging techniques to determine the best image quality of CT data (e.g., homogenous tagging of fluid and stool), and highest patient acceptability, as well as evaluate the adequacy of preparation for same-day colonoscopy. Diagnostic reader performance will focus on the accuracy for detecting all neoplastic lesions including colon cancers, adenomatous polyps, sessile adenomas and flat adenomas. Most importantly, these results will help inform the design of a larger trial of an optimized CT colonography technique in a community setting.