Study to Test the Safety and Tolerability of PF-07220060 in Participants With Advance Solid Tumors...
LiposarcomaCRC4 moreThis is a Phase 1/2A, open label, multicenter, nonrandomized, multiple dose, safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of PF-07220060 administered as a single agent and then in combination with endocrine therapy.
Decreasing Dosing Regimens of Abiraterone 500 mg in Men With Prostate Cancer to Find Lowest Recommended...
Prostate CancerProstate Adenocarcinoma2 moreDoctors leading this study plan to collect new information about the lowest effective dose of abiraterone acetate in study participants with prostate cancer who are taking abiraterone in combination with prednisone for the first time. The duration of this study will be about 3 months (12 weeks). How long you stay on abiraterone, and at what dose after completion of the 12 weeks of study drug administration, will be up to you and your treating physician.
Focal Brachytherapy in Patients With Selected "Low-risk" Prostate Cancer - a Phase-II-trial
Prostate CancerThis trial examines the feasibility and toxicity of focal brachytherapy in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
The Metformin Active Surveillance Trial (MAST) Study
Prostate CancerThis study aims to see if metformin can delay the time to progression in men with low risk prostate cancer when compared to a placebo.
Prostate Screening Study Using MRI in BRCA Carriers
Prostate CancerMen with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation are at increased risk for early onset, aggressive prostate cancer compared to men in the general population. Standard of care screening for men with a BRCA mutation includes PSA testing and digital rectal examination (DRE), the same as with men in the general population. This study is being done to assess whether there is value in using MRI as a screening tool to detect prostate cancer at an earlier stage than may otherwise be detected using standard of care screening (PSA, DRE). It is unclear whether MRI has utility as a screening tool in this specific population at high risk for aggressive disease.
CyberKnife® as Monotherapy or Boost SBRT for Intermediate or High Risk Localized Prostate Cancer...
Prostate AdenocarcinomaThe primary objective of this study is to document the effectiveness of Cyberknife stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the treatment of intermediate and high-risk localized prostate cancer defined by biochemical Disease-Free Survival (bDFS), using Phoenix and American Society of Therapeutic Radiation and Oncology (ASTRO) definitions, at 5 years. During the prostate-specific antigen era, an ever-increasing percentage of men with prostate cancer have presented with clinically localized, potentially curable disease. Although conventional treatment options are potentially curative in selected patients, these treatments also have drawbacks, including the risk of negative long-term quality of life consequences and serious complications. The CyberKnife® system is a type of radiation machine that uses a special system to precisely focus large doses of x-rays on the tumor. The device is designed to concentrate large doses of radiation onto the tumor so that injury from radiation to the nearby normal tissue will be minimal. Intermediate risk patients will be treated with either CyberKnife® Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) monotherapy or CyberKnife® SBRT boost followed by Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT). High risk patients will be treated with CyberKnife® SBRT boost followed by IMRT. Treatment will last 4-7 days. Patients will complete the QOL questionnaires before treatment. Questionnaires will also be completed during follow-up visits at 1, 3 , 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months then every 12 months until year 5.
HSV-tk + Valacyclovir Therapy in Combination With Brachytherapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer
Prostatic NeoplasmsThe purpose of this study is to conduct a Phase I - II clinical trial to extend preclinical studies involving in situ HSV-tk + Valacyclovir gene therapy in combination with brachytherapy for recurrent prostate cancer. This will provide a novel therapeutic approach to prostate cancer and hopefully impact on the development of metastatic disease and the control of preexisting metastasis.
Continuous Monitoring of Prostate Position During Radiotherapy
Prostate CancerThis study is investigating measurement of prostate motion during radiotherapy using the implanted gold markers. If motion is greater than 3mm then the beam will be stopped and position corrected (gating).
Prostate Advances in Comparative Evidence
Prostate CancerThis study is an international multicentre randomised study of organ confined low and intermediate risk prostate cancer and is composed of two parallel randomisation schemes based on applicability of surgery as a treatment for the patient. Patients for whom surgery is a consideration are randomised to either laparoscopic prostatectomy or prostate SBRT. Patients for whom surgery is not a consideration are randomised to either conventionally fractionated radiation therapy or prostate SBRT. Efficacy, toxicity and quality of life outcomes will be compared across the pairs in each randomisation.
Surgery Versus Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer
Prostatic NeoplasmsThis prospective, open randomized phase III surgical trial seeks to study whether radical prostatectomy (with or without the combination of external radiation) improves prostate-cancer specific survival in comparison with primary radiation treatment and hormonal treatment among patients diagnosed with locally advanced (T3) prostate cancer. Untreated or conservatively treated locally advanced prostate cancer is associated with high mortality. Modern curative treatment for advanced solid malign tumors include surgery and/or radiation plus attempted chemotherapy if available to achieve both local control and elimination of potential micro metastases. Whereas there is evidence that surgery can cure localized prostate cancer, there are no clinical trials of multi-modal treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer that includes surgical removal of the prostate. One potential advantage of adding prostatectomy to the treatment of LAPC is that removing the prostate enables a full pathological assessment of the tumor characteristics and thus a better estimation of the risk of recurrence. Surgical treatment could thus reduce the numbers needed to treat with chemotherapy and radiation, and thus improve quality of life after treatment. In addition, evidence indicate that residual cancer in the prostate occurs in 25% after radiation treatment (56) and surgical removal of the prostate may improve survival beyond what can be achieved by radiation and ADT. On the other hand, patients treated with surgery, radiation and hormones will experience side effects of all three treatment modalities and might fare better if radiotherapy plus hormones can provide oncological control without prior surgery. A randomized clinical trial comparing two multimodal treatment regimens of which one includes a radical prostatectomy is therefore warranted.