Active clinical trials for "Prostatic Neoplasms"

In recent years, quite a few studies have demonstrated the possibility of 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy as a viable treatment option in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), which has been shown desired effect. To increase tumor accumulation and retention for radioligand therapy, and reduce dosage of 177Lu, we conjugated a truncated Evans blue (EB) molecule and DOTA chelator onto PSMA-617 (EB-PSMA) and labeled it with 177Lu. This study is designed to assess the efficiency and response to 177Lu-EB-PSMA (55 mCi) in patients with mCRPC.

The purpose of this study is to examine the safety and efficacy of cirmtuzumab in combination with standard of care docetaxel in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. Docetaxel is a taxane chemotherapy which has been shown to prolong survival in men with castration resistant prostate cancer. Cirmtuzumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets the receptor called ROR1 of the non-canonical Wnt pathway and is suspected to contribute to prostate cancer growth and progression.

Background: Identifying medium- and high-risk prostate cancer early may allow for treatments to work. But identification can be hard. Researchers want to see if a radiotracer used during PET scans can help. Objective: To test how an imaging agent called 18F-DCFPyL detects response to standard prostate cancer treatment. Eligibility: People ages 18 and older with newly diagnosed prostate cancer who have no evidence of distant metastatic disease and plan to get stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Design: Participants will be screened with: Medical history Physical exam Blood tests MRI Participants will have baseline MRI and PET/CT scans. For the MRI, they may get a contrast agent by IV injection. For the PET/CT scan, they will get an IV injection of 18FDCFPyL. About 1 to 2 hours later, they will get the PET/CT scan. During the scans, participants will lie on their back and remain still for 45 minutes to 1 hour. These scans will be repeated at different points during the study. Participants will get SBRT with or without ADT. Participants will complete questionnaires about their quality of life. Participants will be asked about any symptoms they are having. They will also be asked about medications they are using. They may have a physical exam. Participants will give blood and urine samples. They will give a tumor sample from a biopsy they have had in the past. After treatment, participants will have follow-up visits. These will occur 1 month after treatment, then every 3 months for a year, and then every 6 months for 1 more year.

This phase II study will investigate the activity and safety of radionuclide 177Lu-PSMA therapy versus 177Lu-PSMA in combination with Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in patients with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

The goal of this prospective study is to test the efficacy of Echolaser transperineal focal therapy in patients with low- and intermediate risk prostate cancer. The main question it aims to answer are: 1. short and intermediate term oncological outcomes after laser focal therapy, 2. functional outcomes and quality of life after treatment. Participants affected by low risk prostate cancer will undergo trans perineal laser focal therapy. Multiparametric prostate MRI will be perform after 3 and 12 months for oncological control. Re-fusion biopsy will be perform after 12 months. Functional outcomes and quality of life will be assess at 3, 6 and 12 months.

This study will evaluate whether simvastatin reduces intraprostatic immunosuppressive microenvironment through YAP-mediated T-reg dysfunction, and increases intraprostatic anti-tumor immune response in men recently diagnosed with localized prostate cancer electing to receive prostatectomy for their care. Half the men will be randomized to receive statins for 8 weeks prior to their surgery, while the other half will receive standard of care.

EBRT is one of the standard treatment options for patients with localized PCA. Based on the outcome of randomized trials, moderately hypofractionated RT(19-25 fractions of 2.5-3.4Gy) is considered equivalent to conventional fractionated schemes with 35-39 fractions of 2Gy. A schedule of 20 fractions to a dose of 60-62Gy is adopted as standard of care for all risk-groups. Driven by the success of moderate hypofractionation, there is a strong trend towards extreme hypofractionation, also called SBRT, reducing the number of fractions even further. The schedule mostly used is 5 fractions of 7-7.25Gy. Its effectiveness, equivalence to standard EBRT schedules, has been demonstrated for low and favourable intermediate risk (IM) patients. For unfavourable IM (here defined as IM with ISUP grade 3) and high-risk (HR) PCA the outcome of EBRT can be further improved by dose escalation. Because of dose-limiting toxicity, the maximal dose of EBRT for conventionally fractionated schemes was approximately 80Gy. Initially hypofractionation was considered as a potential way to escalate the biologically effective dose (BED) above 80Gy, however, this proved not to be the case. With hypofractionation, a saturation in dose effect seems to be present at a BED of 80Gy. Recently, the multi-centre phase III FLAME trial broke the '80Gy barrier' and showed that in mainly HR PCA patients, treated with a conventional fractionation schedule, focal boosting of the intraprostatic lesion to a total dose of 95Gy improves biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS). However, given the advantages of hypofractionation in terms of patient comfort and costs, the FLAME schedule is not ideal as the standard treatment. For unfavourable IM and HR PCA patients the value of SBRT has not yet been established. The FLAME trial showed that higher than standard BED is a prerequisite for optimal bDFS. Furthermore, post SBRT biopsies results suggest a dose response relationship with better outcome of dose levels above 40Gy. Therefore, probably a higher than standard dose SBRT is necessary for these patients. A recent meta-analysis suggests diminishing results from increased fraction sizes in SBRT. So, the question remains whether dose escalation in SBRT will indeed improve treatment outcome. With standard SBRT to the whole prostate, dose escalation is limited to 40Gy because of unacceptable toxicity. In line with FLAME, we conducted the Hypo-FLAME trial investigating focal dose escalation in SBRT. In the phase II Hypo-FLAME trial, 100 patients with IM or HR PCA were treated with SBRT 35Gy in 5 weekly fractions to the whole prostate with a focal boost up to 50Gy. The acute toxicity rates, the primary endpoint, were low and similar to standard SBRT indicating this schedule can be safely applied. Given this was a phase II trial, no conclusions on oncological outcome can be drawn. Shortening of the overall treatment time (OTT) has been suggested to play a role in SBRT efficacy and 5 fractions delivered every other day this is internationally accepted as standard. We therefore initiated the phase II Hypo-FLAME 2.0 trial, investigating the feasibility of a reduction in the OTT of the Hypo-FLAME schedule from 29 to 15 days with acute toxicity as primary endpoint. The accrual of this trial is completed and a first analysis of the primary endpoint shows low toxicity figures, well in the range of what was expected. We expect to submit the analysis for publication by the end of 2022. At present, it is unknown what the oncological efficacy of the Hypo-FLAME schedule is compared to the standard of care in unfavourable IM and HR prostate cancer. Therefore, we will conduct a Phase III multi-centre randomized trial, in which 484 patients with unfavourable IM or HR PCA will be randomized between: Standard treatment; moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy 62 Gy in 20 fractions of 3.1Gy Experimental treatment; SBRT 5x7Gy with an iso-toxic integrated focal boost up to 50 Gy (Hypo-FLAME).

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 over a change of androgen receptor-directed therapy (ARDT) treatment in prolonging radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) in Chinese metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients, who were previously treated with another ARDT as last treatment and who have not been exposed to a taxane-containing regimen in castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) or hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) settings and who are considered appropriate for delaying taxane-based chemotherapy. The primary endpoint of rPFS will be assessed via blinded independent centralized review of radiographic images provided by the treating physician and as outlined in Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) guidelines.

This clinical trial will evaluate the safety of Cabazitaxel in combination with 177Lu-PSMA-617 in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

The purpose of this study is to learn whether adding abemaciclib to abiraterone plus prednisone prolongs the time before prostate cancer gets worse. Participation may last approximately 60 months.