Active clinical trials for "Head and Neck Neoplasms"

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of aprepitant combined with ondansetron and dexamethasone to prevent nausea and vomiting induced by Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) cisplatin-chemotherapy regimen in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck

The aim of the study is to assess the effects of a continuous popliteal block on postoperative pain and recovery after major ear, nose and throat surgery with microvascular free flap reconstruction using a fibula graft.

This is a phase IB/II trial to examine feasibility and safety of checkpoint blockade (aPD1 with or without aCTLA4) neoadjuvant to standard of care (SOC) in advanced stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), a patient population in need for improved clinical outcome and in tumors likely to respond to neoadjuvant aPD1 and aCTLA4. In addition, with this research protocol the potential impact of intratumoral hypoxia on tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) abundance, differentiation and effector function will be assessed, and the potentially divergent effects of T cell checkpoint blockade in areas of hypoxia and normoxia.

This Phase 1 study is designed as a cell dose escalation trial in HLA-A*02:01 and HLA-A*02:06 subjects with MAGE-A10 positive urothelial, melanoma or head and neck tumors. The study will enroll subjects between the ages of 18 and 75 using a modified 3+3 cell dose escalation design, to evaluate dose limiting toxicities and determine the target cell dose range. Following the dose escalation phase, additional subjects will be enrolled at the target cell dose range to further characterize safety and the effects at this cell dose. The study will take the subject's T cells, which are a natural type of immune cell in the blood, and send them to a laboratory to be modified. The changed T cells used in this study will be the subject's own T cells that have been genetically changed with the aim of attacking and destroying cancer cells. When the MAGE-A10ᶜ⁷⁹⁶T cells are available, subjects will undergo lymphodepleting chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine, followed by T cell infusion. The purpose of this study is to test the safety of genetically changed T cells and find out what effects, if any, they have in subjects with urothelial, melanoma or head and neck cancer. Subjects will be seen frequently by the Study Physician after receiving their T cells for the next 6 months. After that, subjects will be seen every 3, 6, or 12 months according to the Schedule of Procedures. All subjects completing or withdrawing from the interventional portion of the study will enter a long term follow-up phase for observation of delayed adverse events and overall survival for 15 years post-infusion.

This two-part study consists of a phase 1 dose escalation study in participants with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors, and a phase 2 portion in up to 3 groups with either small cell lung cancer, breast cancer and/or one other solid tumor type.

Currently, patients with cancer of oral cavity or oropharynx T1-T2N0 classified, are treated surgically with systematic lymph node dissection while in 70%, there is no lymph node metastasis. The technique of identifying the sentinel node (GS) is validated for these tumors because the status of the sentinel node is predictive of the other nodes status in the neck. This helps to diagnose the presence of metastases without lymph node dissection and thus select patients requiring a treatment node. However, the oncological and functional results of a therapeutic strategy based on identifying the GS is unknown. This open-label randomized multicenter clinical trial aims to compare the oncologic and functional outcome of two strategies : the current management versus the management based on the sentinel lymph node. The hypothesis is based on a nodal control difference at 2 years in both arms not exceeding 10%. The medico-economic analysis will be conducted in two stages : a classic stage on 2 years with estimated incremental cost-effectiveness and incremental cost-utility, then a step with log term modeling. A reduction in morbidity and treatment costs in the sentinel node arm are expected in this study.

Placement of a feeding tube through a gastrostomy can be performed endoscopically or radiologically. While percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement is most frequently performed using a "pull" technique, this method may not feasible in patients with malignant, or tight benign, esophageal stenosis. Further, the "pull" technique may drag tumor cells with the feeding tube and lead to implantation metastasis at the gastrostomy site. A clinical practice update by the American Gastroenterological Association has recommended that the pull-through PEG placement method should be avoided in all patients with oropharyngeal or esophageal cancer. It also recommends that the introducer/Push PEG method should be favored instead of the pull PEG. In such situations, an introducer-style, "Direct" gastrostomy tube can be placed endoscopically or radiologically. However, the published data comparing outcomes and safety of endoscopic "Direct" PEG (D-PEG) and interventional radiological PEG (IR-PEG) are very sparse. The D-PEG is performed under endoscopic visualization of the gastric wall which facilitates greater control and allows safe selection of gastrostomy site. Further, the presence of an endoscope enables transillumination to confirm the absence of intervening abdominal viscera between the abdominal wall and the anterior wall of the stomach. These advantages are lacking with the IR-PEG. We hypothesize that D-PEG is safer than IR-PEG. In this single center, non-randomized study, patients unable to undergo a conventional per-oral "Pull" PEG and needing a D-PEG will be prospectively enrolled. For the comparison arm, historical IR-PEG procedures at our center will be assessed. The technical success and rates of adverse events will be compared between the two arms. Approval from the Institutional review board has been obtained. Based on our experience, we estimate a sample size of 40 participants in each arm and anticipate completion of this pilot study by June 2021.

Patients with head and neck cancer often undergo complex surgeries requiring significant care post-operatively. This presents considerable psychosocial challenges in addition to their need to physically recover from a large surgery. The study team will interview patients who have undergone virtual visits before their surgical procedures. The study aims to explore patients' experiences, satisfaction, and perceptions of virtual visits for informing and preparing them for surgery and their postoperative care needs. The study team will also analyze the effects of the virtual visits on financial costs and patient outcomes such as length of hospital stay, delayed discharges due to social issues, and whether the virtual visits identified any significant medical concerns, etc. The study team will compare these to a randomly selected cohort of patients who also underwent surgical resection and reconstruction for head and neck cancer that did not get pre-operative virtual visits.

Enrollment in clinical trials usually favors a particular demographic group. But there is limited research available to explain what study attributes affect the completion of these specific demographic groups. This trial will evaluate the safety and efficacy of head and neck cancer treatments. The focus will be on tracking the rates of completion and withdrawal among these individuals. It will also try to analyze data from the perspective of different demographic groups to check for recurring trends which might yield insights for the sake of future head and neck cancer studies.

The study aim to investigate the relationship between cutaneous adverse events and quality of life in patients taking immune check point inhibitor or cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 and 6 inhibitors by two steps. In the first one, it will be investigated the relationship between the skin toxicity related to the use selected therapies and the quality of life of patients already receiving these therapies for treatment of their cancer. In the second one, it will be evaluated the relationship between skin toxicity and quality of life over three months of treatment in patients initially naïve for selected therapies. Cancer included in the analysis are NSCLC, renal cancer, gastric cancer, breast cancer, bladder cancer, melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.