Active clinical trials for "Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung"

This is a multi-center phase III randomized controlled study, designing to access whether the efficacy of EGFR-TKI alone on patients with brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutant type is not inferior to EGFR-TKI concurrent with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), the primary end point is intracranial PFS (iPFS), while secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), evaluation of cognitive function, quality of life (QoL) and adverse events.

The aim of this study is to determine if the Investigational Medicinal Product Tedopi (OSE2101) is more effective than standard treatment in treating patients with stage IIIB NSCLC unsuitable for radiotherapy or metastatic NSCLC in second- or third-line treatment after failure of immune checkpoint-inhibitor regimens.

This study is designed to evaluate the safety of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SBRT) in selected patients with stage I Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) or metastatic lung cancer to demonstrate the feasibility and risks of using an ablative dose-adapted scheme with FFF beams. Other aims are To evaluate the incidence of acute and late complications; To evaluate tumour response to local radiation therapy by means of CT, PET/TC and MRI and To evaluate the impact of local therapy on overall and disease-free survival.

Evaluate the efficacy and safety of Monosialoganglioside(GM1) to prevent the neurotoxicity induced by cisplatin

Gefitinib, the first EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in the world was examined as monotherapy in two phase Ⅱ studies called IDEAL trials. Response rate with doses of 250mg and 500mg/day were similar, ranging from 10% to 18%. Posterior analysis demonstrated that patients with EGFR mutation had an improved response rate (RR) to gefitinib compared to wild-type patients (46% versus 10%). The early trials that evaluated EGFR-TKIs for the second- and third-line settings of advanced NSCLC did not select patients on the basis of any EGFR marker. The IEESSA Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer (ISEL) trial evaluated the role of second-line gefitinib 250mg/day in 1692 patients with advanced NSCLC. Patients with EGFR mutations had higher RR than patients without (37.5% versus 2.6%). From the above results, the response rate in patients without EGFR gene mutation was obviously different (10% versus 2.6%). The methods used for detecting EGFR gene mutation was different, which might contribute to the difference of response rates. In IDEAL trial, EGFR gene mutation was detected by sequencing. But in ISEL trial, EGFR gene mutation was detected by ARMS. As we know, ARMS was more sensitive than sequencing in detecting EGFR gene mutation. That is to say, in IDEAL trials some EGFR mutant patients were misdiagnosed as wild-type patients, so the response rate was higher. Recently, Wu Yi-Long et al reported that relative abundance of EGFR mutations predicted benefit form gefitinib treatment for advanced non small cell lung cancer. The study cohort was all Chinese. In this study, the objective response rate in patients without EGFR mutation detected by ARMS was 16.1%, which was significantly higher than the response rate of docetaxel. But in 2012 American society of clinical oncology (ASCO) annual meeting, the Tailor study in which Italian NSCLC patients were enrolled demonstrated a clear superiority of docetaxel over erlotinib as second line treatment for patients without EGFR mutations in exons 19 or 21. So we wonder if the racial difference is the determinant factor. So the purpose of this trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of gefitinib with docetaxel as second-line therapy for advanced or metastatic Chinese NSCLC patients with wild-type EGFR.

In the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline for NSCLC, epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) is recommended as the third-line treatment for EGFR gene mutation negative NSCLC patients who failed to the first-line platinum doublet chemotherapy [i.e. paclitaxel-carboplatin (PC) or gemcitabine-cisplatin (GP)] and the second-line chemotherapy with docetaxel or pemetrexed. But as we know, if patients had no EGFR gene mutation, EGFR-TKI treatment is not effective. The overall survival is short and the objective response rate is low. As for EGFR gene wild type patients with good performance status, besides EGFR-TKI treatment, other first generation cytotoxic drugs i.e. vinorelbine or ifosfamide maybe an alternative treatment. So the purpose of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness and safety of vinorelbine-ifosfamide with gefitinib in advanced or metastatic EGFR gene mutation negative NSCLC patients.

The primary objective is to assess the safety and tolerability of multiple doses of Simotinib Hydrochloride in NSCLC patients. The secondary objective is to determine the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile and explore the preliminary anti-tumor activity.

This is a multi-center phase II randomized controlled study to assess the efficacy of Pemetrexed/cisplatin with or without Bevacizumab on patients with brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) harboring EGFR wild type by intracranial PFS(iPFS),also PFS ,DCR and OS.The side effect is evaluated as well.

This study will evaluate the survival of non-small cell lung cancer (wild-type EGFR) participants treated with Tarceva after at least one failed chemotherapy treatment, and the impact of prior chemotherapy treatments.

This 2 arm study will compare the efficacy and safety of treatment with erlotinib intercalated with platinum-based therapy or erlotinib along, as first line treatment in Stage IIIB/IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutation. Patients will be randomized to receive gemcitabine (1000mg/m2 iv) on days 1 , and cisplatin (75mg/m2) or carboplatin (5xAUC)on day 1, followed by erlotinib 150mg/day from day 15 to day 28 of each 4 week cycle for a total of 6 cycles,then followed by erlotinib monotherapy, or erlotinib 150mg/day .The anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression, and the target sample size is 60 individuals.