Active clinical trials for "Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung"

This is an Expanded Access Program (EAP) available to patients who have advanced cancers, who have failed or progressed on standard of care systemic therapy and do not qualify for ongoing clinical trials.

The purpose of this study is to provide brigatinib for those patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic patients with ALK+ NSCLC on an expanded access basis due to their inability to meet eligibility criteria for on-going recruiting trials, inability to participate in other clinical trials (e.g., poor performance status, lack of geographic proximity), or because other medical interventions are not considered appropriate or acceptable.

This is an open-label, multicenter, intermediate-sized expanded access treatment protocol to the existing IND 111,695 for ensartinib (X-396). The treatment plan is designed to provide ensartinib to participants with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

This is an expanded access program (EAP) for eligible participants. This program is designed to provide access to Telisotuzumab vedotin prior to approval by the local regulatory agency. Availability will depend on territory eligibility. A medical doctor must decide whether the potential benefit outweighs the risk of receiving an investigational therapy based on the individual patient's medical history and program eligibility criteria.

The purpose of this study is to provide treatment with nivolumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, to subjects who have relapsed after treatment with a minimum of 1 prior systemic treatment for advanced or metastatic squamous (Sq) or non-squamous (non-Sq) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) , Stage IIIB/IV and whose physicians believe that nivolumab treatment is appropriate.

The purpose of this study is to provide ZD1839 for those patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic non-operable non-small cell lung cancer (stage III or IV) or recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell head and neck cancer who receive the therapy on an expanded access basis due to their inability to meet eligibility criteria for on-going recruiting trials, inability to participate in other clinical trials (e.g., poor performance status, lack of geographic proximity), or because other medical interventions are not considered appropriate or acceptable.

Rationale: Accurate staging of lung cancer is important because it directs treatment and determines prognosis. The development of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR), has revolutionized radiation therapy for early stage lung cancer and results demonstrate similar outcomes in comparison to surgical resection of the lung tumor. The staging work-up program for patients with a potentially resectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) includes at least a computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest and integrated Positron Emission Tomography - Computed Tomography (PET/CT) scans, and when indicated, invasive mediastinal staging. However, patients who are treated with SABR do not routinely undergo the same nodal staging work-up as do surgical candidates. As both surgery and SABR appear to achieve comparable rates of local and regional tumor control, it appears only logical to perform a similar staging work-up in all patients with early stage lung cancer who will be treated with either of the two curative local modalities. In the past, a lack of invasive nodal sampling before SABR was considered acceptable as invasive surgical staging (mediastinoscopy) was widely considered the preferred procedure. However, with minimally invasive and safe endosonography procedures now available, improved pre-treatment staging has become possible for patient groups who are eligible for SABR, including those with significant comorbidities. Hypothesis: Complete endosonographic (combined endobronchial and esophageal) staging of hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with (suspected) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) will result in change of loco-regional nodal status in 20% of patients, in comparison to staging by PET-CT alone. Study population: Patients with either established or suspected early-stage NSCLC who are medically inoperable, or who refuse surgery but are potential candidates for SABR with curative intent (provided no intrathoracic metastases are present). Patients will undergo a single scope complete mediastinal and hilar staging procedure (combined EndoBronchial UltraSound (EBUS) and Transesophageal Endoscopic Ultrasound with EBUS scope (EUS-B)).

This study has been designed in order to detect EGFR mutation abundance of tissue and concentration of plasma from Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer during treatment with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) .Through this experiment the investigators aim to evaluate the feasibility of plasma EGFR detection and evaluate the correlation of EGFR mutations and prognosis.

This is an observational retrospective study. The primary objective is to investigate the expression and potential prognostic role of Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) in tumor samples from 350 patients with early stage treatment-naive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Tissue samples were embedded in a tissue microarray. PD-L1 will be studied by immunohistochemistry using the SP263 antibody. Stained samples will be evaluated independently by two operators. A tumor will be defined as positive when = or >50% of tumor cells express the ligand. The investigators will investigate the relationship between PD-L1 protein expression and overall survival and other clinical characteristics with appropriate statistical methods.

The incidence and mortality rate of lung cancer is the highest in the world. Current studies have found that tumor markers, inflammatory or nutritional indicators have a good predictive value for the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Neuron specific enolase (NSE) and serum albumin (Alb) are important indicators for monitoring tumor progression and nutritional status in lung cancer patients, respectively. Previous studies suggested that the higher the NSE, the worse prognosis of NSCLC patients, while the lower the Alb, the worse the prognosis of patients with malignant tumors. Through a retrospective study, the investigators found that NAR (NSE Alb Ratio) was higher and prognosis was poorer in patients undergoing NSCLC surgery. This is better than the previous assessment indicators PLR (platelet to lymphocyte ratio), NLR (neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio), AGR (albumin to globulin ratio), NAR can better assess prognosis. Therefore, on the basis of the previous retrospective analysis, the optimal NAR cut-off value was calculated according to ROC curve, and the value was grouped into multi-center prospective cohort study, and the relationship between NAR and other clinical indicators was studied by chi-square test. Univariate and multivariate analysis of Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to determine the prognostic factors. Finally, NSCLC patients were stratified according to tumor stage and pathological classification, and the differences of survival time between high NAR group and low NAR group were compared again under different stages and types, and the different stages of NAR in NSCLC patients were further analyzed. The clinical significance of typing. By exploring and validating the relationship between NAR and the prognosis of NSCLC patients, the investigators try to establish a new prognostic index. Obviously, it has important value for clinical application.