Active clinical trials for "Carcinoma"

To learn if adding 1 year of therapy with pembrolizumab can help to continue to control RCC after radiation therapy.

A phase 2 randomised controlled trial will be performed in which the efficacy and safety of standard treatment (primary chemoradiation; consisting of 64.5 Gy in 30 fractions of external beam radiotherapy with weekly cisplatin for six weeks) and experimental treatment (NACT; consisting of carboplatin and paclitaxel in a 3-weekly scheme) will be compared in 98 patients with LAVC, registered from eight national medical centres.

Research shows that most oral cancer patients are already locally advanced when first diagnosed. Even after surgery and radiation, nearly half of patients develop recurrence or metastasis. Even in patients who survive, there is a serious decline in quality of life due to the after-effects of surgery and radiation. Many patients therefore refuse surgery and lose the treatment opportunity. Many studies at home and abroad have found that preoperative induction chemotherapy for locally advanced tumors can reduce tumor load, reduce tumor scope, eliminate distant micro metastases, reduce the risk of recurrence and metastasis, and improve organ preservation rate. It has been confirmed in many clinical studies and our clinical practice of oral cancer MDT(Multi-Disciplinary Treatment) that induction chemotherapy with TPExtreme protocol (cetuximab + albumin-paclitaxel + cisplatin) for patients with locally advanced oral cancer can significantly reduce the tumor with a good objective response, which can create good conditions for surgery. Therefore, for patients sensitive to induction chemotherapy, there are no authoritative guidelines and clinical studies to say what is the scope of surgery. One option is for the thoroughness of the tumor resection, which is still the same as the scope of the tumor before induction therapy, but the scope of the surgery is still large, and the damage to the patient's quality of life is also serious. The other option is to perform modified radical surgery according to the scope of residual tumor lesions after induction therapy, with less trauma and less damage to the quality of life. Postoperative radiotherapy (chemical) therapy is to reduce the risk of recurrence. Our preliminary clinical practice also shows that Patients sensitive to induction chemotherapy can obtain better survival rate and quality of life after comprehensive treatment including modified radical surgery. This treatment mode is feasible, but the overall efficacy evaluation needs further study. Therefore, in this real world prospective clinical study, patients with oral cancer sensitive to induction chemotherapy will be treated with modified radical surgery or traditional radical surgery in full compliance with the patient's wishes. Through clinical observation and follow-up statistics. To explore the effects of two treatment regimens on survival rate and quality of life in order to find the best treatment mode.

Background: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the 6th most common cancer worldwide. These cancers have different causes, with smoking/tobacco exposure and human papilloma virus infection being the most common. . When HNSCC occurs in people who are not infected with HPV, the cancers are more likely to return after treatment; when this happens, overall survival is only about 10 months, thus better treatments are needed. Objective: To test a combination treatment using 2 drugs (valemetostat and pembrolizumab) in people with HNSCC. Phase 1b of the study will determine a recommended dose of the 2 drugs and evaluate how safe the combination is.; this will include patients with HPV-positive and HPV-negative HNSCC, as well as squamous cell NSCLC that have progressed on anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 therapies.Phase II will determine how effective the combination is and will focus on patients with HPV-negative HNSCC. Eligibility: People aged 18 years and older with HPV-negative HNSCC, sinonasal carcinoma of the head and neck, or squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Design: Participants will be screened. They will have a physical exam. They will have blood and urine tests and tests of their heart function. They will have imaging scans. They may have a biopsy: A small sample of tissue will be removed from the tumor. Treatment will be given in 21-day cycles. Pembrolizumab is administered through a tube attached to a needle inserted into a vein in the arm. Participants will receive pembrolizumab on the first day of each cycle. Valemetostat is a tablet taken by mouth. Participants will take the tablet once a day at home. They will record the date and time of each dose in a diary. They will also write down any adverse effects they experience. Participants may remain in the study up to 2 years.

Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab combination therapy (AtezoBev) is well-known 1st-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there are unmet needs for patients with advanced HCC who do not respond to AtezoBev. External beam radiotherapy (RT) is another well-known locoregional therapy for HCC that induces inflammatory cascade and abscopal effect as a systemic anticancer effect and enhances the effect of AtezoBev. Therefore, the investigators aim to verify the effect of AtezoBev plus RT for advanced HCC through this single-center, prospective phase II one-armed cohort study over three years. This study recruits 51 patients to verify the effect of the intervention. Atezolizumab (1200mg) and Bevacizumab (15mg/kg) are administered to patients once for each cycle at 3-week intervals, and additional radiotherapy for the mass or portal vein tumor thrombosis is performed before second cycle of AtezoBev. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival by using response evaluation with modified RECIST.

Currently in France, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents over 30% of indications of liver transplantation (LT) (# 500 cases/year). Chemoembolization (TACE) is the most commonly used bridge treatment in those patients (estimate 60%). These patients will present with a complete response in only 60 % of the cases (# 180 patients per year in France) and failure in 40 % of the cases (# 120 patients per year in France). A systemic treatment using lenvatinib might provide a benefit in patients presenting with a non-resectable HCC in waiting list for LT and with a TACE failure (i.e. those with an active disease and a partial response or a stable disease or a progressive disease on imaging data, in particular when AFP remains significantly increased after 2 TACE) by decreasing dropout rate before LT and decreasing recurrence rate post-LT without new safety signal.

PRV211 is a sterilized nano engineered delivery system intended for intraoperative chemotherapy treatment for all solid tumor surgeries immediately following surgical excision. The goal is to treat the tumor bed locally, eliminating any remaining micro metastases or close margins that are unable to be fully resected while avoiding system circulation. This study will enroll up to 40 subjects. In this study both safety and efficacy will be evaluated. All subjects will be monitored for possible DLTs.

This longitudinal study looks to quantify the testing timeline, operational barriers, and outcomes of biomarker-guided therapy in a large, community-based, and largely unselected patient population with early stage and advanced stage, treatment-naive non-small cell lung cancer, whether squamous or non-squamous.

This study is aimed to establish an organoid-on-chips technological system based on biopsy samples and evaluate its efficacy in predicting the response to mFOLFOX6 infusion in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the effects of a higher dose of cabozantinib or the effects of cabozantinib-nivolumab combination in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who have progressed on or after receiving cabozantinib treatment. The study will have two parts or "cohorts". Cohort 1: cabozantinib 80mg daily Cohort 2: cabozantinib 40mg daily with nivolumab The cohort assignment will be determined by investigator, based on how much cabozantinib the participant is able to safely receive.