Active clinical trials for "Carcinoma"

The purpose of this study is to correlate molecular genetic profile with response to chemotherapy in case of primary chemotherapy treatment for non-small cells lung carcinoma.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of certain variables such as the fullness of the patients bladder and the position of the treatment applicator on the dose of radiation that other organs such as the bladder and the rectum receive during radiation treatment for endometrial carcinoma.

The goal of this multicenter retrospective cohort study is to investigate the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors after hepatic resection in patients with HCC exhibiting PVTT, and to develop a prognostic index that can be helpful in determining the treatment strategy.

The purpose of this study is to learn about the effectiveness of the first and later lines of medicines on clinical outcomes in people with mRCC. The study includes participants who: are 18 years old or above and have mRCC took medicines that use the bodies immunity to fight against cancer as their first choice of treatment took other medicines after taking the above first choice of treatment This is a study that looks into the data collected through a particular database from selected academic clinical sites participating in this study. The data of interest include: the length of time between the start of a patient's treatment and the end of treatment the length of time between the start of treatment and death physician assessment of a patient's response to treatment We will compare the experiences of people receiving different combinations of treatments and see if there are any differences in the effectiveness of these medicines.

To compare the predictive ability of ALBI and PALBI grades with CTP and MELD scores. To investigate the efficacy of ALBI and PALBI grades for predicting the prognosis of HCC and overall survival among different modalities of treatment.

I) Introduction Patients with cancer face difficult choices that require balancing competing priorities such as survival, functional capacity and symptom relief. Most patients with advanced cancer (>80%) expect frank yet sensitive discussions with their physicians about prognosis and treatment choices in order to be involved in the decision-making process. Nevertheless, this kind of discussion is frequently lacking, and consequently, patients often have a biased view of their own prognosis such as an underestimation of disease severity, or unrealistic expectations for cure. Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may be treated with systemic therapies which may prolong survival but are not curative. Patients with advanced HCC often report expectations for survival and treatment-related side effects that differ from their treating physician. Accordingly, communication on prognostic and treatment choices is essential to obtain an accurate understanding of the disease that allows patients to make informed decisions. To the best of our knowledge, a thorough evaluation of the physician-patient communication quality has never been performed in advanced HCC patients. The aim of our study is to assess the perception of the expected prognosis and treatment side effects by the patient and his physician during the first consultation before the initiation of a new systemic therapy. II) Type of study: Prospective, observational, non-interventional multicentric study III) Outcomes III.1) Primary Outcome Evaluate the concordance between the patient's perception of his prognosis and treatment side effects with the one of his treating physician. III.2) Secondary Outcomes Compare the patient's expectations for the aforementioned items to those of his physician and the degree of concordance between them. Evaluation of patient satisfaction with the information received during the consultation Assessment of patient-reported symptoms of anxiety and depression Evaluate the association between individual prognosis expectation (i.e., patient and physician) and data from the available literature. IV) Recruitment All consecutive patients with a new systemic treatment prescribed for HCC in participating centres will be included for a period of 1 year.

The present study will aim to describe and understand, in the real-world, the clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) patients treated with cabozantinib or axitinib monotherapy in England using the existing data source, Cancer Analysis System (CAS).

Data regarding hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after directly acting antivirals (DAAs) given for hepatitis C virus treatment are contradictory. Surprisingly, some studies reported that DAAs are accompanied with higher HCC recurrence. But, other studies showed no rise or even decrease in HCC recurrence. Most of these studies were retrospective and some were non-randomized prospective studies. Here investigators aim to perform a randomized controlled trial to study this issue.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a global importance due to its high rate of progression and high mortality rates. Significant risk factors for the development of HCC are metabolic syndrome, obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM). Dysregulation of adipose tissue derived hormones(adipocytokines/adipokines) might also be involved in obesity-related liver carcinogenesis & due to the wide spectrum of visfatin and vaspin activities ,we focus in this study on their potential role in patients with HCV-related liver cirrhosis with and without HCC on top.

RCC (Renal Cell Carcinoma) is the most common form of kidney cancer, accounting for 2-3% of all adult malignancies and for 90% of all kidney cancers. The incidence of RCC has steadily increased over the past two decades, showing a plateau in recent years. Many patients with RCC remain asymptomatic until late disease stages and other patients have disease at diagnosis (metastatic RCC or mRCC). Recently, the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) cabozantinib was approved as a first-line therapy for patients with advanced clear-cell RCC (ccRCC). Cabozantinib was initially approved for patients previously treated with antiangiogenic therapy based on the phase 3 METEOR study, which demonstrated a clinical benefit compared with everolimus. Immunotherapy has been also developed in ccRCC. The frontline treatment paradigm for ccRCC has evolved, particularly for intermediate-/poor-risk patients, with the recent addition of cabozantinib and nivolumab/ipilimumab (immunotherapy), but overall survival data are needed to understand their benefit-to-risk profiles compared with established therapies. In October 2016, the Spanish Agency of medicines (AEMPS) granted the temporary Authorization for special use to Cabometyx® 20/40/60 mg within a Managed Access Program (MAP) for the treatment of advanced RCC in adults following prior VEGF-targeted therapy (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor targeted therapy). The MAP allows the possibility of using a medicinal product which is not yet commercially available or approved. By the end of the MAP period, on July 2017, 136 patients had been included by 61 centers who received at least one dose of Cabometyx® for the treatment of advanced RCC. Since then, Cabometyx® 20/40/60 mg was made commercially available for the treatment of advanced RCC in adults following prior VEGF-targeted therapy. After the commercialization of Cabometyx® in July 2017 in Spain, the inclusion of new patients in the MAP was closed but those patients that were already included continued receiving Cabometyx® free of charge until clinical decision. In July 2018, the European Commission approved a new indication for adult patients previously untreated with intermediate or poor risk. Based on this rationale, the aim of this study is to obtain safety and effectiveness information regarding the use of cabozantinib in a non-selected RCC population, both in patients that received this agent under the MAP or under routine clinical prescription (real-world [RW]).