Active clinical trials for "Carcinoma"

This study was designed to predict the toxicity and efficacy of Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-modulated Chemoradiotherapy in Upper Thoracic I-IVA Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth most common cancer in China, with a crude incidence rate of 26.67 per 100,000 population. Moreover, 357,800 new liver cancer cases are predicted to be diagnosed in China in 2020. HCC represents approximately 90% of all cases of primary liver cancer. HCC has a high predilection for portal vein invasion, which occurs in 44-62% of living patients with HCC. Patients with PVTT usually have an aggressive disease course, decreased liver function reserve, limited treatment options, thus worse overall survival. Among untreated HCC patients with PVTT, the median overall survival has been reported as low as 2 to 4 months with supportive care. Sorafenib is the first-line treatment for HCC patients with PVTT, however, it has shown unsatisfactory benefit. Notably, sorafenib combined with TACE significantly improved the TTP over sorafenib alone, albeit for no more than 1 month in the median TTP, and the median OS was not significantly prolonged. A promising drug-lenvatinib was approved in China on September 2018, in the China patients subgroup analysis showed an encouraging results. Lenvatinib group had showed a significant benefit in TTP, PFS and ORR. Also median overall survival time was significantly improved in China subgroup (Lenvatinib group: 15 months VS Sorafenib group: 10.2 months). However, REFLECT didn't enrolled patients who had tumors invading the maint portal vein. The mechanisms of lenvatinib or sorafenib combined with TACE were still unknown, and clinical data were limited. This study was to explore lenvatinib plus TACE versus sorafenib plus TACE for HCC with PVTT: efficacy and safety. Biomarkers expression of VEGFR, FGFR, FDGF-α, IL-2,etc would be detected to find the difference between the two groups, finally to analyze the relationship between clinical outcomes and biomarkers' expression. A better treatment modality to HCC with PVTT patients would be expected and promoted.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SCT-I10A for Recurrent/ Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous cell Carcinoma who progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy

To evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of autologous γδT cells in the treatment of advanced hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma.

At the initial diagnosis of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, a considerable proportion of patients have developed distant metastasis, forming subclinical lesions. Nowadays, with the advent of intensity modulated radiotherapy, the local-regional area is under well controlled. However, distant metastasis is still the main cause of failure in treatment of stage N2-3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma.The severe toxicity of synchronous chemotherapy and the dose intensity of single drug is not enough to effectively control existing subclinical lesions. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with sufficient intensity (four cycles) can possible effectively kill subclinical lesions prior to the initiation of concurrent chemoradiotherapy, thereby reducing distant metastasis of stage N2-3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Meanwhile, four cycles of chemotherapy have been shown to be well tolerated in other tumors. In conclusion, 4-cycle neoadjuvant chemotherapy in combination with radiotherapy is expected to further control the distant metastasis rate of N2-3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma and improve the survival rate.

The proposed study is an open-label, single-center, single arm phase 1b study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of radiotherapy plus sintilimab for HCC with PVTT.

The purpose of this study is to compare induction chemotherapy (docetaxel+cisplatin+fluorouracil) plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), in order to confirm the value of induction chemotherapy in NPC patients.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether interleukin-2, interferon-alpha in combination with bevacizumab are effective in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

This prospective, observational, multicentre, post marketing surveillance study will collect safety and efficacy information on patients with Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (LA SCCHN) treated with Cetuximab and Radiotherapy (RT) based on the locally approved label.

Recently, a clinical trial has shown that PRFA is as effective as HR for small HCC in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival. This has prompted some authors to suggest that PRFA could be more suitable than HR for early stage HCC. Some authors also have suggested that PRFA can be considered the treatment of choice for patients with single HCC ≤ 2.0 cm, even when HR is possible. On the other hand, some tumors (subcapsular location, adjacent to intestinal loops or main bile ducts) may be unsuitable for PRFA because of the risk of bleeding, tumor seeding, bile leakage, perforation, and so on. Furthermore, in our previous experience, some tumors (with deep locations, which were included as "central HCC") may be also unsuitable for HR because of risks of more injury of normal liver tissue, blood loss after resection, and so on. Therefore, the appropriate therapeutic option for these HCC tumors ≤ 2 cm, especially for central HCC, is still under debate. To clarify this issue, the investigators conducted a study that included a consecutive series of patients with single resectable HCC < 2.0 cm in diameter, who underwent PRFA or HR.