Active clinical trials for "Cholecystitis"

Patients with acute cholecystitis or pancreatitis due to gallstones benefit from emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Patients with emergency LC show improvement in their quality of life within one month compared to those treated. Delayed LC (after the acute phase has passed and recovered) and less time to work. This strategy reduces the risk of repeated admissions with more pain or pancreatitis. There are many studies on the effectiveness of the Elective LC and Transversus Abdominis Plan (TAP) Block on pain. However, a prospective study on the reduction of postoperative pain with emergency LC and TAP Block has not been carried out until now. This study will be conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the TAP Block in patients undergoing emergency LC.

Acute cholecystitis is a common disease in the daily practice of general surgery. There are various methods in the treatment of this disease, such as early cholecystectomy, medical treatment, six weeks later cholecystectomy and cholecystostomy. However, it is not satisfied with objective criteria that these methods are selected according to which patient groups. With this observational-prospective study, the benefit of first visit scoring on 'which of the treatment options will be most suitable for the patient' will be investigated. Thus, rare but severe complications of cholecystectomy can be prevented.

The SPRIMACC study is a prospective multicenter observational study with the primary endpoint to prospectively validate the Chole-Risk score in predicting a complicated postoperative course (post-operative major complications (Clavien-Dindo>=3a), length of stay (LOS) > 10 days or need of readmission within 30 days from the discharge) in patients undergoing Early Cholecystectomy (EC) for Acute Calculous Cholecystitis (ACC). The secondary endpoints of the study are to prospectively validate and compare other wellknown risk prediction models (the POSSUM/P-POSSUM score, the Modified Frailty Index (mFI), the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and the APACHE II score) in predicting a complicated post-operative course in patients undergoing EC.

Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is an increasingly performed procedure for acute cholecystitis (AC), safe and less invasive than laparoscopic cholecystectomy, very useful in selected patients (severe comorbidities, not suitable for surgery/general anesthesia,..) The investigators conduct a retrospective observational study. Period: 2016-2021. Inclusion criteria: Patients treated with PC for AC. Tokyo guidelines TG13/18 the investigators algorithm to treat AC. The characteristics of the sample undergoing Percutaneous Cholecystostomy, main indications, evolution and clinical results were reported in an initial observational study. Subsequently, a retrospective analytical study was designed to compare various cohorts: lithiasic vs alithiasic Acute Cholecystitis, elective vs emergency surgery or management with PC alone.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) gained popularity among general surgeons in 1990s and rapidly become one of the most commonly performed procedures in digestive surgery, with more than one million cholecystectomies being performed in the United States per year. LC remains also one of the most commonly performed procedure by general surgeons during the training period. Even if previous report LC cases performed by surgical trainees (ST) are not associated with higher operative morbidity, the length of operative time is significantly increased when compared with that of LC cases performed by attending surgeons, due, most of all, to difficulties in identifying the anatomical structure, and this sometimes leads to an attending surgeon taking away the case from the trainee. Furthermore, despite the fact that LC has proven to be a safe procedure, the rate of common bile duct (BDI) injury still remains unacceptably high even in the hands of minimally invasive trained surgeons ranging from 0.2 to 1.5% in individual reports, much higher than initial reports, associated with significant morbidity and mortality, lower quality of life and increased costs, related to additional health care measures, loss of work days, and insurance claims. The aim of this study is to address which of the techniques now available could be addressed as the best option in a training setting to enhance the learning curve, to ideally build a safe cholecystectomy training program and virtually eliminate the risk of BDI due to anatomic misinterpretation during the training period.

This study is planning to develop the audiovisual videos and determine whether educational videos are superior to routine discussion for informing patients in the emergency department (ED) about risks, benefits, and alternatives to receiving percutaneous cholecystostomy. Eligible patients will be approached when patients will be scheduled and waiting for receiving percutaneous cholecystostomy in the emergency department.

The main objective of this pilot study is to show feasibility to collect peri-operative and postoperative clinical data of the study group of gastric bypass without cholecystectomy compared with the control group of gastric bypass with cholecystectomy. Our hypothesis is that the approach without cholecystectomy would be superior in terms of a decrease of perioperative adverse events and postoperative complications, as well as lenght of operation, lenght of hospital stay, overall costs with a very low risk of biliary complication in the follow up. These findings could be helpful to build a baseline for a future randomized controlled multicenter study allowing significance of these results and help orientate surgeons towards best surgical care of the gallbladder with confirmed absence of stones in the obese patient undergoing gastric bypass.

The smoke produced by the electric section of the tissues during laparoscopy alters the vision of the operative field and presents potential risks. A new medical device with CE marking (Ultravision ©) has been developed to limit electroprecipitation on the wall and tissues of the abdomen. The aim of the work is to evaluate the effectiveness of this medical device in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystitis. It is an intervention for a common pathology where smoke is particularly important due to the tissue inflammation and due to the extensive dissection necessary to perform the surgical procedure. A randomized double-blinded study will be conducted in two academic hospitals (Marseille North Hospital and Timone, APHM) evaluating the use of a smoke electroprecipitation device (Ultravision ©) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystitis operated at the acute phase. A group of 30 patients using the device will be compared to a control group of 30 patients. The evaluation will last thirty days per patient and the duration of inclusion is 2 years. The main objective is to demonstrate a significant reduction in operating duration by using the device. The secondary objectives are to reduce the CO2 consumption, the surgical incidents and the discomfort of the surgeon related to the smoke.

Virtual reality devices are widely accepted tools to familiarize surgical novices with the principles of laparoscopy. Free Virtual reality training will be tested against basic training and efficacy assessed in a randomized controlled trial of surgical novices.

The primary objective is to collect data on treatment outcomes (clinical and microbiological cure), safety and tolerability of treatment with cefoperazone/sulbactam in patients with serious intra-abdominal and hepatobiliary infections in Slovakia.