Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery vs Flexible Single Incision Surgery for Cholecystectomy
CholelithiasisSurgery1 moreProspective randomized pilot clinical trial, with 3 arms and one year follow up. The study will include 60 patients, with a 1:1:1 ratio, 20 patients per group. In 40 patients a transumbilical single site incision will be performed with two different manners: single-port device SILS TM (Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery), and flexible endoscope and accessory trocars in a single incision (FSIS-Flexible Single Incision Surgery). The third group is the control one, a conventional laparoscopic approach. The trial is designed as a pilot study to assess, as main objective, if these two endoscopic approaches have the same security and effectiveness in cholecystectomy. Hypothesis: Transumbilical approaches with single port and single incision with the flexible endoscope have the same efficacy and safety performing the endoscopic cholecystectomy. Objectives: Main objective: Assess whether both approaches are equally safe in its application to endoscopic cholecystectomy. Secondary objectives: Investigate the differences in the rate of conversion to open surgery between different surgical approaches. Investigate the differences in the rate of wound infection between the different surgical approaches. Investigate the differences in the rate of postoperative incisional hernias between different surgical approaches. Investigate whether there are differences in the rate of overall complications, all-cause mortality and the cost between different surgical approaches.
Single Incision Laparoscopy
AppendicitisCholelithiasis1 moreLaparoscopic surgery being performed with only one small incision via the umbilicus (belly button).
Digital SpyGlass Confirmed Common Bile Duct Stones Clearance Without Fluoroscopy
Common Bile Duct DiseasesStone - Biliary2 moreThis study aim to evaluated the effectiveness of Digital SpyGlass Cholangioscopy to facilitate common bile duct stone removal without fluoroscopy
LaGRA Trial in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Regional Anesthesia MorbidityGallbladder Stone1 moreThis study investigated the effectiveness of a surgeon administered, laparoscopic guided, regional anaesthesia technique.
Comparison of Oblique Subcostal, Posterior or Dual Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic...
Laparoscopic CholecystectomyCholelithiasis1 moreThe aim of the study is to evaluate the difference of postoperative analgesic effects and opioid consumption between ultrasound-guided unilateral oblique subcostal, posterior, or dual TAP blocks in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis.
A Trial of Single Incision Versus Four Ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
CholelithiasisBackground: Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is increasingly being used as a minimally invasive surgery with potential benefits over 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in terms of postoperative pain and faster recovery. Methods: Seventy-three patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis were randomized to SILC (n=37) or LC (n=36). Data measures included operative details, adverse events, postoperative pain and analgesic requirements, success of the ambulatory process, return to normal activity and return to work, cosmetic results and quality of life score.
The Role of Ursodeoxycholic Acid in Treatment of Gallstones in Hemolytic Disorders
Hemolytic DisordersGallstonesIt is well established that hemolytic diseases predispose patients to the development of pigment gallstones. Gallstones are noted in at least 5% of children under the age of 10 years, increasing to 40-50% in the second to fifth decades. The co-inheritance of Gilbert's syndrome increases the risk of cholelithiasis four to five-fold. In patients with chronic hemolysis, total bile lipid concentration is decreased and the total bilirubin to total lipid ratio is increased. This suggests that the conjugating capacity of hepatocytes is surpassed by the excessive amount of bilirubin resulting from hemolysis. Increased bilirubin monoconjugate and unconjugated bilirubin can precipitate in bile and form complexes with inorganic ions, mostly calcium, and develop into stones. Patients with hemolytic disorders can also develop biliary sludge, a suspension of precipitated particulate matter in bile dispersed in a viscous, mucin-rich liquid phase . The chemical composition of the precipitates correlates well with the composition of the associated stone and sludge often stands as a harbinger of future stone development. There is strong data suggesting a benefit in treating cholelithiasis with UDCA and also in preventing gallstone development in various high risk scenarios. There are several proposed mechanisms for the positive effect of UDCA in primary prevention of pigment stones. Mucoglycoproteins are present in significant amounts in black pigment stones and contribute to the matrix of gallstones. UDCA suppresses the secretion of protein and decreases the levels of various proteins in bile . It has also been suggested that increased colonic bile salt may solubilize unconjugated bilirubin and may prevent calcium complexing. There is no published data at present on the role of UDCA in prevention and treatment of cholelithiasis in hemolytic diseases. The investigators hypothesise that UDCA can be of benefit to patients with hemolytic disorders in the primary prevention of pigment stones, possible resolution of biliary sludge and existent stones, and reduction of symptomatic episodes of cholelithiasis.
Renalof in the Treatment of Elderly Patients With Gallstones
CholelithiasisThe purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of Renalof administration in the treatment of gallstones (cholelithiasis) as determined by ultrasonography and clinical evaluation in elderly patients (aged >65 years). The duration of this double-blind placebo controlled phase 3 clinical trial will be 6 months. The estimated number of patients to be recruited and randomized for the study is 40.
A Comparison of Single Port and Four Port Laparoscopic Gallbladder Removal
CHOLELITHIASISNew minimally invasive surgical treatments are often outpatient procedures with low complication rates, promising fast recovery. The traditional physician-reported outcomes such as complication rates, blood loss, and hospital stay are not useful to guide treatment recommendations for one or the other minimally invasive procedure. This study aims to apply patient-reported outcomes developed within the NIH framework for cancer research and chronic disease treatment to the comparative effectiveness research in minimally invasive procedures for benign disease.
Transvaginal NOTES Cholecystectomy: Phase I/II Mexico Clinical Trial
CholelithiasisCholecystectomy is one of the most common general surgery procedures performed in the US today and is among top 10 procedures performed in U.S. hospitals annually, and biliary tract disease has been estimated to cost U.S. healthcare $5 billion/year. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was introduced in the early 1990s and has become the standard surgical approach for the treatment of gallbladder disease. More than 500,000 cholecystectomy procedures are performed in the US every year. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now performed as an outpatient basis and is related to a very low complication rate. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy requires the use of multiple trocar incisions. Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery(NOTES) is a new type of surgical procedure currently being studied around the world. The idea of NOTES was developed several years ago in response to the concepts that patients would realize the benefits of less invasive surgery by reducing the recovery time, experience less physical discomfort associated with traditional procedures have virtually no visible scarring following this type of surgery. All of these advantages have spurred research and investigation forward, encouraging physicians and researchers to develop new equipment and techniques to use during NOTES procedures. Although the Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery approach may hold tremendous potential, there are many issues that need to be addressed before this technique is introduced into clinical care. The purpose of this study is to determine the safety, feasibility and short-term clinical outcomes (Phase I trial) of transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy in female patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis and compare it to Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (Phase II). Hypothesis 1: Transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy is safe and feasible in female patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis. Hypothesis 2: The short term outcomes of Transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy are comparable to Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in female patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis. Aim 1: Determine the safety of Transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy. Aim 2: Determine the feasibility of Transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy. Aim 3: Determine the short-term outcomes of Transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy. Aim 4: Compare the short-term outcomes of Transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy to Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.