Sunitinib in Treating Patients With Kidney Cancer That Cannot Be Removed by Surgery
Kidney CancerRATIONALE: Sunitinib may stop the growth of kidney cancer by blocking blood flow to the tumor and by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying the side effects and how well sunitinib works in treating patients with kidney cancer that cannot be removed by surgery.
Thermal Ablation and Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Treating Patients With Spine Metastases...
Malignant Digestive System NeoplasmMetastatic Head and Neck Carcinoma11 moreThis phase II clinical trial studies how well thermal ablation and spine stereotactic radiosurgery work in treating patients with cancer that has spread to the spine (spine metastases) and is at risk for compressing the spinal cord. Thermal ablation uses a laser to heat tumor tissue and helps to shrink the tumor by destroying tumor cells. Stereotactic radiosurgery delivers a large dose of radiation in a short time precisely to the tumor, sparing healthy surrounding tissue. Combining thermal ablation with stereotactic radiosurgery may be a better way to control cancer that has spread to the spine and is at risk for compressing the spinal cord.
Study to Evaluate Ibrutinib Combination Therapy in Patients With Selected Gastrointestinal and Genitourinary...
Metastatic Renal Cell CarcinomaAdvanced Urothelial Carcinoma2 moreThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of single agent ibrutinib or the combination treatments of ibrutinib with everolimus, paclitaxel, docetaxel, pembrolizumab or cetuximab in selected advance gastrointestinal and genitourinary tumors.
A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of TLC388 in Advanced/Metastatic RCC Patients...
Advanced/Metastasis Renal Cell CarcinomaINVESTIGATIONAL PRODUCT: TLC388 (Lipotecan*) *Lipotecan is a drug product of TLC388 HCl. PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT: Phase II No. OF PATIENTS: Approximately 40 (Stage I: 15 evaluable patients, Stage II: 25 evaluable patients) STUDY OBJECTIVES: Primary • To evaluate non-progression disease (non-PD) rate at the end of cycle 6 Secondary To evaluate progression free survival (PFS) To evaluate overall survival (OS) To evaluate the duration of non-PD To evaluate objective response rate (ORR; where ORR= CR+PR) and duration To evaluate the safety profile of TLC388 To evaluate change in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at the end of cycle 6 STUDY DESIGN: This is a Phase II, open-label, single-arm, multi-centre study to evaluate TLC388 monotherapy in patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
Sunitinib Scheduling in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC)
Genitourinary CancerKidney CancerThe goal of this clinical research study is to learn more about the safety of giving sunitinib to patients with metastatic kidney cancer for 2 weeks followed by 1 week in which they receive no drug. Researchers want to learn more about the side effects of the drug and the effects of a different dosing schedule.
A Dose Escalation and Cohort Expansion Study of Anti-CD27 (Varlilumab) and Anti-PD-1 (Nivolumab)...
Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN)Ovarian Carcinoma-Enrollment Completed3 moreThis is a study to determine the clinical benefit (how well the drug works), safety, and tolerability of combining varlilumab and nivolumab (also known as Opdivo® , BMS-936558). Both drugs target the immune system and may act to promote anti-cancer effects.
Bioequivalence & Food Effect Study in Patients With Solid Tumor or Hematologic Malignancies
Hematological NeoplasmsNon-Hodgkin's Lymphoma18 moreThis is a Phase 1, open-label, multicenter, randomized, 2-stage crossover study consisting of 2 phases: Stage I - Pharmacokinetics (Bioequivalence), with an Extension Stage II - Pharmacokinetics (Food Effect) with an Extension This study will enroll approximately 60 subjects in stage I and 60 subjects in stage II with hematologic or solid tumor malignancies, excluding gastrointestinal tumors and tumors that have originated or metastasized to the liver for which no standard treatment exists or have progressed or recurred following prior therapy. Subjects must not be eligible for therapy of higher curative potential where an alternative treatment has been shown to prolong survival in an analogous population. Approximately 23 sites in the US and 2 in Canada will participate in this study.
Study to Explore the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of MK-3475 in Combination With INCB024360...
Microsatellite-instability (MSI) High Colorectal Cancer (CRC)Endometrial Cancer12 moreThe purpose of this study was to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy when combining MK-3475 and INCB024360 in participants with certain cancers. This study was conducted in 2 phases, Phase 1 and Phase 2.
Neoadjuvant MEDI 4736 +/- Tremelimumab in Locally Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
Renal Cell CarcinomaKidney CancerThe purpose of this study is to investigate the safety and feasibility of administering investigational drugs (meaning not Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for kidney cancer) prior to surgical treatment for kidney cancer. The first drug is called MEDI4736, and the second drug is called tremelimumab. Both of these drugs work by attaching to certain proteins on immune cells with the goal of stimulating an immune response against cancer cells. This is a phase 1 trial, with the primary goal of identifying if this treatment is safe and possible side effects when given prior to surgery for kidney cancer.
Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Sunitinib in Renal Cell Carcinoma Progressed to 1L Immunotherapy...
Clear Cell Renal CarcinomaThe therapeutic scenario of metastatic renal cancer is undergoing a new revolution with the appearance of a novel therapeutic strategy after the antiangiogenic treatments, that is the immunotherapy, in addition to the approval of new active drugs in the following lines of treatment. There are currently two phase III trials in the first line of treatment in metastatic renal cancer that include different combinations of treatment based on immunotherapy. If results of these studies were positive, the therapeutic algorithm would be modified so that the remaining drugs would have to be repositioned within the therapeutic decision scheme. Sunitinib has previously demonstrated its benefit in patients who had failed to prior treatment with cytokines, so it is likely to continue to be effective in patients who have become resistant to treatment with new drugs based on immune checkpoint blockade. This phase II study is developed to evaluate the activity of sunitinib after treatment with immunotherapy-based regimens that are currently being developed within phase III clinical trials.