Active clinical trials for "Hepatitis B, Chronic"

Chronic Hepatitis B carriers (normal LFTs and viral load < 2 x 10^4 IU/ml are not recommended to be treated by guidelines as they are at low risk for complications. However, it is unclear if treatment can enhance HBsAg loss which has been shown to be associated with significantly lower risk of complications compared to those without HBsAg loss. Consequently, this is a proof of concept study to determine the possibility of HBsAg loss in Chronic Hepatitis B carriers in a randomised open label clinical trial comparing no treatment to 24 weeks peg-interferon alpha 2a or 48 weeks peginterferon alpha 2a (randomised 1:1:1). The primary endpoint of HBsAg loss will be evaluated 24 weeks after the end of therapy for those on therapy and matched to an equivalent timepoint in the control arm. The sample size calculation is 30 patients in each arm for a 20% difference between any experimental arm and the control arm.

The aim of current study is to investigate whether the HBsAg clearance rate can be improved if applying RGT((Response-Guided Therapy) strategy in HBeAg positive CHB(chronic hepatitis B) patients treated by nucleoside analogue(NUC) achieved HBVDNA<1000copies/ml，and HBsAg<5000IU/ml; &HBeAg<100PEIU/ml (or470s/co), combined with PEG-IFN a-2a for 24 weeks.

The general objective of the present clinical trial is to compare the therapeutic efficacy of a combination therapeutic vaccine containing hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg) [later called NASVAC] with a commonly used antiviral drug, pegylated interferon in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

Study Purpose: The purpose of this study is to assess that Liquid Acupuncture(Herb Acupoints Injection) Therapeutics could achieve permanent efficacy response in Chronic Hepatitis B. Efficacy Assessment: At cessation of the Treatment(about at 24 weeks)comparing Testing Data with the Normal Criteria and their individual baseline.Continue for monitoring the Status 1-5 years. Data Analysis: Each 4 weeks collecting Patients' testing data and fill a table.A summary table will be presented as frequency tables for categorical variables as number or percentage.

The purpose of this study is to investigate antiviral efficacy of the combination treatment with Poly IC and Entecavir and compare with the efficacy of Entecavir mono-therapy for chronic hepatitis B.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the antiviral activity and safety of EntecaBell ODT. in chronic hepatitis B Patients.

Currently, there are several antiviral treatments effective for suppression of viral replication but still failed to cure HBV infection in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Seven drugs have been worldwide approved for the treatment of CHB at present: conventional IFN (IFN) alfa, lamivudine (LAM), adefovir dipivoxil (ADV), pegylated IFN (Peg-IFN) alfa, entecavir (ETV), telbivudine (LdT) and tenofovir (TDF). Conventional or Peg-IFN alfa monotherapy has a narrow range of efficacy, is associated with several adverse effects and is inconvenient because of frequent injections. Oral nucleot(s)ide analogues (NA) are better tolerated; but virologic response to NA is frequently not durable and prolonged treatment is associated with the emergence of drug-resistant HBV mutants. Although the best treatment choice for CHB is not clarified yet, certain therapeutic concepts could be derived from the experience of treating patients with chronic hepatitis C or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. A major advancement in treating hepatitis C or HIV infection has been the development of combination therapy. Combination therapy has ever been investigated in patients with CHB, but again the optimal strategy remains to be identified. Entecavir, a carbocyclic deoxyguanosine NA, is one of the most potent anti-HBV agents ever discovered. In addition, the 6-year drug resistance rate is 1.2% in selected lamivudine-naïve cohorts. Pegylated interferon alfa-2a possesses both antiviral and immunomodulatory effects. Overall, satisfactory virologic and serologic responses could be achieved using pegylated IFN alfa in around 30-44% of these patients. Whether the combination therapy using Peg-IFN alfa-2a plus ETV can achieve a long-term beneficial effect against ETV or Peg-IFN alfa-2a alone is not clarified. A prior single-arm pilot study suggested that similar combination therapy may be beneficial in patients with CHB. In this proposal, the investigators thus hypothesize that the efficacy by using combination therapy with Peg-IFN alfa-2a plus prolonged ETV is superior to that by using ETV or Peg-IFN alfa-2a alone in that Peg-IFN may restore host immunity against HBV and prolonged ETV can maximize viral suppression. The objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of Peg-IFN alfa-2a at a dose of 180 mcg administered subcutaneously per week and ETV 0.5 mg daily for 48 weeks followed by ETV 0.5 mg daily monotherapy for an additional 96 weeks versus ETV 0.5 mg daily monotherapy for 144 weeks or Peg-IFN alfa-2a 180 mcg per week for 48 weeks in patients with HBeAg-negative CHB. It will be an open-label, randomized, comparative, multi-center clinical trial. The recruited patients will be equally randomized into three treatment groups. Treatment-free follow-up period will be 48 weeks in both groups of patients. The primary parameter is the "Simultaneous achievement of HBsAg titer below 100 IU/ml and HBV DNA below 300 IU/ml at 144 weeks after start of treatment", by an intention-to-treat analysis. Genotypic and virologic resistance to ETV will also be assessed at baseline and at end of years 1, 2 and 3. The investigators anticipate that the rate of HBsAg <100 IU/mL plus HBV DNA <300 IU/mL at 3 years of the study period will be 30% for patients receiving Peg-IFN therapy and increased to be 45% for patients receiving Peg-IFN plus entecavir therapy. With a 5% nominal significance level (two-sided), 163 patients per group under a 1:1:1 ratio will provide 80% power to detect a difference of 15% in treatment response rates between group I and III. Because this will be a 4-year study for each patient, the investigators thus anticipate that the dropout rate may be as high as 10%. Accordingly, a total of 540 (180x3) patients will be recruited, in order to account for a dropout rate of up to10%.

This research puts liver biopsy as the enrollment screening criteria and the primary efficacy assessment indicators. Patients at different developmental stages of hepatitis B related liver fibrosis are respectively diagnosed and treated by Traditional Chinese medicine to determine optional diagnosis and treatment plan of traditional Chinese medicine to screen the advantage-treated population and to establish a treatment program, which can save national medical resources, for clinical application of Traditional Chinese medicine Diagnosis and Treatment blocking and reversing hepatitis B-related liver fibrosis. The research can help to build automation pathological analysis and diagnosis systems and non-invasive clinical assessment criteria and models of liver fibrosis which can be applied in clinical. It can also help to realize electronic patient data collection and management, to establish patients management centre and follow-up database. Then it will help to improve clinical efficacy of being blocked and reversed chronic hepatitis B related liver fibrosis by Chinese medicine Diagnosis and Treatment program, to reduce the incidence of liver cirrhosis and hepatitis B-related mortality, to prolong patients' survival and improve patients' quality of life, to make clinical efficacy, which is about Traditional Chinese Medicine blocking and revering chronic hepatitis B-related liver fibrosis, increase by 15% or more .

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Domestic Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Tablets in Chinese patients with hepatitis B ,compared with Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Tablets of Gilead.

This open-label study is an roll-over extension of a randomized trial "Efficacy of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients with High Viral Load but Slight Aminotransferase Elevation" (NCT01522625). After finishing the 3-year therapeutic trial, all patients receive open-label TDF for another 3 years. All patients undergo liver biopsy to evaluate the stage of fibrosis after the 3-year open-label therapy. During the 3-year period, patients were followed up every 12 weeks for the biochemical, serological, virological parameters, and adverse reactions. The primary outcome is the progression of liver fibrosis. Safety issues such as change of renal function and bone mineral density are 2nd outcomes.