Active clinical trials for "Kidney Failure, Chronic"

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of sequential ascending doses of JTZ-951 administered for 15 days in anemic subjects with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving hemodialysis.

Evodial +hemodialyzer consists of an evolution of the existing CE marked Evodial device, with respect to the hemodialyzer membrane removal characteristics. Different membrane prototypes configurations are proposed (3 versions in total), with the objective to modulate the hemodialyzer removal capacities (convective and adsorptive capacities). Materials(including heparin grafted specifications) as well as the sterilization process are identical to the Evodial hemodialyzer. Based on available preclinical data , a clinical study is requested to document in vivo the different prototypes removal capacities with respect to middle Molecular Weight (MW) reference toxins such as b2 Microglobulin and collect data with regards to protein loss.

Many patients on hemodialysis experience high rates of symptom burden, such as pain, depression, anxiety and difficulty breathing. This study seeks to reduce these symptoms by modifying the usual guidelines used to manage patients on hemodialysis. For example, rather than trying to keep serum phosphorus below 5.5, patients enrolled in this study may have treatment goals of less than 6.5, in order to reduce the number of pills they need to take and potentially reduce harmful side effects. Blood pressure and serum parathyroid hormone goals will also be modified, to see if these modifications help hemodialysis patients feel better.

To investigate the biocompatibility of the peritoneal dialysis (PD) solution balance in comparison to the conventional PD solution in APD(automated peritoneal dialysis) patients using the APD cycler sleep•safe.

To demonstrate that cyclosporine-sparing immunosuppressions with the standard dose of Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium would preserve renal graft function after transplantation without an increase of incidences of adverse events, such as biopsy confirmed acute rejection, local or systemic infections, and bone marrow suppression.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of neutral pH and low glucose degradation product (GDP)-containing peritoneal dialysis fluid (PDF) on systemic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction markers in incident PD patients.

The purpose of this trial is to determine if sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) is an effective treatment of mild hyperkalemia in chronic kidney disease patients followed at a pre-dialysis or nephrology outpatient clinic. Subjects will be randomized to one of two treatment arms: 30 g of placebo or SPS to be taken orally once daily for seven days. The change in serum potassium levels will be compared in both treatment groups. The proportion of subjects attaining normokalemia (3.5 to 5.0 mmol/L) after seven days of treatment will also be compared. Finally, side effects will be reported for each treatment arm.

The interest on gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction in CKD has been growing in the last years. it is now accepted that GI dysfunction in dialyzed patients may contribute to systemic microinflammation by promoting gut dysbiosis and bacterial translocation in the blood. Another mechanism by which GI dysfunction contributes to systemic symptoms in CKD is related to metabolic activity of the dysbiotic microflora growing in the gut of these patients to generate toxic compounds such as phenols, indoles, and amines. Epidemiological evidence has strongly linked one of these compounds, p-Cresol, to cardiovascular risk and mortality in CKD. In the present paper the investigators investigated the effect of a probiotic/prebiotic mixture on plasma p-cresol concentrations and GI symptoms and in CKD patients not on dialysis yet.

Purpose: to investigate the effect of bioimpedance analysis(BIA) guided fluid management versus experiential way on clinical outcome in peritoneal dialysis patients. Design: prospective,randomized,controlled,single center study Study hypothesis: Patients on peritoneal dialysis are frequently hypervolemic, which is associated with increasing hazard of death and cardiovascular events. Bioimpedance analysis is a safe, and easy way, which appears to be more useful and sensitive than other techniques for assessing volume status in dialysis patients. Therefore we hypothesize that more concise and strict fluid management guided by BIA may help to improve patients' survival, decrease cardiovascular events and hospitalization rate. Objects: incident and prevalent patients with overhydration status. anticipated cases:240 arms: all the patients are randomized into two arms.(BIA group/clinical group) observational time:12 months Primary Outcome: all cause mortality. Secondary Outcomes: technique survival, cardiovascular events, peritonitis, residual renal function.

As kidney function declines, the ability to maintain water balance is impaired and is most often treated with hemodialysis. The removal of excess water in hemodialysis often leads to a sudden drop of blood pressure and causes symptoms of dizziness, light-headedness, cramping, and chest pain. This sudden drop in blood pressure has been linked with complications of heart attacks, strokes and even death. Research has focused on different ways to prevent dangerous drops in blood pressure during hemodialysis. One way is the use of blood volume monitoring biofeedback technology to monitor the patient's relative blood volume and automatically reduce the amount of fluid that is being removed when the blood volume is low to prevent the drop in blood pressure from occurring. This type of biofeedback device is currently available on some hemodialysis machines and while this approach appealing, it is not clear how effective this form of biofeedback is in preventing the drops in blood pressure. We plan to determine if the use of biofeedback based on the changes in the patient's blood volume will reduce the number of sudden drops in blood pressure that occur during hemodialysis. To do this, we will compare patients treated with this technology to current hemodialysis practices and follow them for important adverse outcomes. The result of interest will be the frequency of hemodialysis sessions complicated by a sudden symptomatic drop in blood pressure. We also plan to monitor the amount of water in the different body compartments, blood pressure, blood pressure medication use, markers of heart function, and patient symptoms and quality of life. We hope that by providing information on this technology we can reduce the sudden drops in blood pressure in hemodialysis, the associated rates of serious disease or death, and improve patient quality of life.