Active clinical trials for "Renal Insufficiency, Chronic"

Hypovitaminosis D is highly prevalent among patients with chronic kidney disease, especially in those undergoing dialysis. The loss of protein to the dialysis solution seems to contribute significantly to the reduced serum levels of vitamin D in these patients. As a result of the disease and the dialysis procedure, there is high prevalence of chronic inflammation and high risk of infections. There is evidence in other populations, that vitamin D has immunomodulatory effects by stimulating the production of cathelicidin, an antimicrobial peptide and suppressing the production of proinflammatory cytokines. Thus, this study aims to investigate the effects of cholecalciferol supplementation on immunological markers in patients in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis with hypovitaminosis D . This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which patients who have vitamin D deficiency [25 (OH) D <20 ng / mL] will be allocated to the intervention group (cholecalciferol) or control (placebo). Patients will receive supplemented 100,000 IU / week cholecalciferol a period of 12 weeks. Before and after the intervention will be determined 25(OH)D, cathelicidin, interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and C-reactive protein serum. In monocytes, we will evaluate cathelicidin, IL-6 and TNF-α, 25(OH)D receptor and α 1-hydroxylase enzyme expression.

The purpose of the ISCHEMIA-CKD trial is to determine the best management strategy for patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD), at least moderate inducible ischemia and advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD; estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30 ml/min/1.73 m² or on dialysis). This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 777 randomized participants with advanced CKD. Participants were assigned at random to a routine invasive strategy (INV) with cardiac catheterization (cath) followed by revascularization (if suitable) plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) or to a conservative strategy (CON) of OMT, with cath and revascularization reserved for those who fail OMT. The trial is designed to run seamlessly in parallel to the main ISCHEMIA trial as a companion trial. SPECIFIC AIMS A. Primary Aim. The primary aim of the ISCHEMIA-CKD trial is to determine whether an invasive strategy of cardiac cath followed by optimal revascularization, in addition to OMT, will reduce the primary composite endpoint of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction in participants with SIHD and advanced CKD over an average follow-up of approximately 2.8 years compared with an initial conservative strategy of OMT alone with catheterization reserved for those who fail OMT. The primary endpoint is time to centrally adjudicated death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI). B. Secondary Aims. Major: To compare the incident of the composite of death, nonfatal MI, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure, and angina symptoms and quality of life, as assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, between the INV and CON strategies. Other secondary aims include: comparing the incidence of the composite of death, nonfatal MI, hospitalization for unstable angina, hospitalization for heart failure, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or stroke; composite of death, nonfatal MI, or stroke; composite endpoints incorporating cardiovascular death; composite endpoints incorporating other definitions of MI as defined in the clinical event charter; individual components of the primary and major secondary endpoints; stroke and health resource utilization, costs, and cost effectiveness. A major secondary aim of ISCHEMIA-CKD trial is to compare the quality of life (QOL) outcomes-patients' symptoms, functioning and well-being-between those assigned to an invasive strategy as compared with a conservative strategy. In the protocol, angina frequency and disease-specific quality of life measured by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) Angina Frequency and Quality of Life scales, respectively, are described as the tools that will be used to make this comparative assessment. Recent work has indicated that it is possible to combine the information from the individual domain scores in the SAQ into a new Summary Score that captures the information from the SAQ Angina Frequency, Physical Limitation and Quality of Life scales into a single overall score. The advantages of using a summary score as the primary measure of QOL effects of a therapy are a single primary endpoint comparison rather than two or three (eliminating concerns some may have about multiple comparisons) and a more intuitive holistic (patient-centric) interpretation of the effectiveness results. With these advantages in mind, the ISCHEMIA leadership has agreed that the SAQ Summary Score will be designated as the primary way this secondary endpoint will be analyzed and interpreted, with the individual SAQ scores being used in a secondary, explanatory and descriptive role. A key subgroup analysis will be to stratify the results among those with daily/weekly angina (baseline SAQ Angina Frequency score ≤60), monthly angina (SAQ Angina Frequency score 61-99) and no angina (SAQ Angina Frequency score = 100). Condition: Coronary Disease Procedure: Cardiac catheterization Phase: Phase III Condition: Cardiovascular Diseases Procedure: Angioplasty, Transluminal, Percutaneous Coronary, other catheter-based interventions Phase: Phase III Condition: Heart Diseases Procedure: Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Phase: Phase III

This study will be conducted in subjects with clinical diagnosis of worsening chronic heart failure and either type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) with or without chronic kidney disease (CKD) or moderate CKD alone treated with evidence-based therapy for heart failure (HF) for at least 3 months prior to emergency presentation to hospital using a multi-center, randomized, adaptive, double-blind, double-dummy, comparator-controlled, parallel-group design. Primary objective of the study is to investigate efficacy [percentage of subjects with a relative decrease in N-terminal prohormone B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) of more than 30% from baseline to Visit 10 (Day 90)] and safety of different oral doses of BAY94-8862 given once daily.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether febuxostat and benzbromarone could protect renal function, and which one could be better.

This is a study to investigate the efficacy and safety of OPC-41061 by 24-week oral administration of OPC-41061 at 15-mg or 30-mg or placebo in patients with chronic renal failure who are undergoing hemodialysis or hemodiafiltration and who have daily urine volume of at least 500 mL/day.

IdeS is an immunoglobulin g (IgG) cleaving enzyme. It will given to patients with donor specific antibodies to reduce the antibody load and thus enable kidney transplantation. IdeS antibody reducing efficacy and its safety will be studied.

Randomized placebo-controlled interventional trial to investigate the effect of oral magnesium supplementation on intracellular magnesium in subjects with chronic kidney disease. We hypothesize that oral magnesium supplementation will increase intracellular magnesium in subjects with chronic kidney disease as well as increase serum magnesium.

The purpose of this study is to analyze the safety, renal function, metabolic disorders and quality of life data in patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis treated with endovascular infusion of bone marrow derived mononuclear cells.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ASP1517 in ESA-naive hemodialysis chronic kidney disease patients with anemia.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ASP1517 in peritoneal dialysis chronic kidney disease patients with anemia.