search

Active clinical trials for "Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive"

Results 1701-1710 of 3300

A Randomized, Open-label, Single-dose, Single-center, Crossover Study in Healthy Subjects to Assess...

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Randomized, Open-label, Single-dose, Single-center, Crossover Study in Healthy Subjects to Assess the Relative Bioavailability of PT010

Completed21 enrollment criteria

Comparison of Time to Extubation Using Sugammadex or Neostigmine

Neuromuscular BlockadeChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

A prospective blinded randomized clinical trial to compare time to extubation using Sugammadex versus Neostigmine/glycopyrrolate as reversal agents after use of neuromuscular blockade agents in an outpatient bronchoscopy suite.

Completed9 enrollment criteria

Identifying Early Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Using Health Administrative Data...

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) affects the airways that causes shortness of breath, cough. COPD gets worse over time, and often leads to emergency department visits, hospital visits, frequent doctor appointments and medications. This means COPD is expensive, and severely impacts patient quality of life. Unfortunately, patients are often not properly diagnosed until their disease is fairly advanced. We know a lot about the health care use of people with COPD once they have been diagnosed, but we do not know much about what happens to them leading up to their diagnosis. Through this project we want to better understand the time period prior to COPD diagnosis, so that we can learn more about what happens to people before they are diagnosed. This project will use health data to find out if we can identify trends in health care use by individuals newly diagnosed with COPD. We will identify people that have COPD based on health records, and look back to find out about their health care use prior to their diagnosis. We will look at data related to doctors' visits, emergency department visits, hospital stays and medications. We want to use these markers to better understand what happens to people before they are diagnosed, and to find out if we can identify risk factors for a COPD diagnosis. We hope by doing this research we can better identify people at risk for COPD and ensure that they receive treatment early, which may improve their health outcomes.

Active5 enrollment criteria

COPD E-cigarette Topography Training

Pulmonary DiseaseChronic Obstructive1 more

This study is for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and who smoke. Investigators are trying to find out if training on e-cigarette use will help smokers switch to e-cigarettes. If training helps, how much training is needed for people to fully switch from cigarettes to e-cigarettes?

Completed40 enrollment criteria

A Clinical Study Assessing Critical Errors, Training/Teaching Time, and Preference Attributes of...

Pulmonary DiseaseChronic Obstructive

This is a randomized, multi-centre, open-label, placebo-device, cross-over study, with a 2x2 complete block design in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to assess the benefits of delivering triple therapy using a single ELLIPTA dry powder inhaler (DPI) (closed triple therapy) versus delivering triple therapy using two different types of DPI (open triple therapy). The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the proportion of COPD subjects who make critical errors when using a single ELLIPTA DPI versus those using combinations of DISKUS® with HANDIHALER®, or TURBUHALER® with HANDIHALER. At Visit 1, all subjects will demonstrate the use of ELLIPTA DPI, and HANDIHALER DPI in combination with either DISKUS DPI (in sub-study 1) or TURBUHALER DPI (in sub-study 2), based on the treatment sequences. At the end Visit 1, subjects will complete the inhaler preference questionnaire (PQ). There is no active treatment and subjects will continue to take their own prescribed COPD medication for the duration of the study. ELLIPTA and DISKUS are registered trademarks of the GSK group of companies; TURBUHALER is a registered trademark of AstraZeneca and HANDIHALER is a registered trademark of Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG.

Completed15 enrollment criteria

Clinical Endpoint Bioequivalence Study of Test and Reference Inhalation Products in Patients With...

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

The purpose of this study is to show bioequivalence of test product to reference product based on baseline-adjusted forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1).

Completed12 enrollment criteria

Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Dose Ranging Study of Tiotropium Bromide Administered Via Inhalation...

Mild to Moderate Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Dose Ranging Study of Tiotropium Bromide Administered Via Inhalation Solution in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).

Completed14 enrollment criteria

Fixed Dose Combination Versus Free Combination of Tiotropium and Olodaterol in COPD

Pulmonary DiseaseChronic Obstructive

This is a 4-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group and active controlled study. Patients will be randomized (1 to 1 ratio) to a 4-week double-blind treatment period of either FDC (fixed-dose combination) of tiotropium + olodaterol (5/5 µg) plus placebo or the free combination of tiotropium 5 µg and olodaterol 5 µg; all administered via the Respimat® inhaler. The purpose is to show non-inferiority between the FDC and the free combination of tiotropium and olodaterol in patients with COPD.

Completed9 enrollment criteria

Study to Evaluate Efficacy/Safety of Combination Budesonide/Indacaterol vs Fluticasone/Salmeterol...

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

To demonstrate the free combination of budesonide and indacaterol is as efficacious as fluticasone and salmeterol in patients with COPD

Completed24 enrollment criteria

Single Portable Pulse-dose-conserving Device vs. Combined Use of Stationary and Portable.

Pulmonary DiseaseChronic Obstructive

Introduction: Portable oxygen devices simplify and facilitate patient therapy. This study was designed to compare oxygen saturation and patient satisfaction with a portable oxygen concentrator or with a combined system consisting of a fixed device with continuous flow oxygen dispensation and a portable device with pulse dispensation for ambulation. Methods: This cross-over trial assessed 25 patients with COPD (92% men; mean age 72.2 ± 7.4 years; mean FEV 34.14 ± 12.51%) at four hospitals in Madrid. All patients had previously used the combined system, consisting of a fixed oxygenation system and a portable system for ambulation, with 16 (64%) using stationary and portable concentrators and 9 (36%) using a stationary reservoir and portable liquid oxygen bag. Oxygenation settings at rest and while walking were determined at baseline. Patients were maintained on the previous combined system for one week and then switched to the portable oxygen concentrator for one week. Mean SpO2 over 24 hours was calculated by the software in the oximeter, and compliance was monitored

Completed12 enrollment criteria
1...170171172...330

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs