Active clinical trials for "Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive"

This is a 4-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group and active controlled study. Patients will be randomized (1 to 1 ratio) to a 4-week double-blind treatment period of either FDC (fixed-dose combination) of tiotropium + olodaterol (5/5 µg) plus placebo or the free combination of tiotropium 5 µg and olodaterol 5 µg; all administered via the Respimat® inhaler. The purpose is to show non-inferiority between the FDC and the free combination of tiotropium and olodaterol in patients with COPD.

To demonstrate the non-inferiority of QVA149 110/50 µg o.d. to fluticasone/salmeterol 500/50 µg b.i.d. in terms of trough Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) (mean of 23 hours 15 min and 23 hours 45 min post QVA149 dose) following 26 weeks of treatment in patients with moderate to severe COPD

Introduction: Portable oxygen devices simplify and facilitate patient therapy. This study was designed to compare oxygen saturation and patient satisfaction with a portable oxygen concentrator or with a combined system consisting of a fixed device with continuous flow oxygen dispensation and a portable device with pulse dispensation for ambulation. Methods: This cross-over trial assessed 25 patients with COPD (92% men; mean age 72.2 ± 7.4 years; mean FEV 34.14 ± 12.51%) at four hospitals in Madrid. All patients had previously used the combined system, consisting of a fixed oxygenation system and a portable system for ambulation, with 16 (64%) using stationary and portable concentrators and 9 (36%) using a stationary reservoir and portable liquid oxygen bag. Oxygenation settings at rest and while walking were determined at baseline. Patients were maintained on the previous combined system for one week and then switched to the portable oxygen concentrator for one week. Mean SpO2 over 24 hours was calculated by the software in the oximeter, and compliance was monitored

To demonstrate the free combination of budesonide and indacaterol is as efficacious as fluticasone and salmeterol in patients with COPD

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the lung function response to UMEC/VI, UMEC, and VI in individual patients using a cross-over design. This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 3-way crossover study. Eligible subjects will be randomized to a sequence of UMEC 62.5mcg, VI 25mcg, and UMEC/VI 62.5/25mcg. All subjects will receive each treatment once-daily for 14 days, and each treatment will be separated by a 10-14 day washout period. There will be a 5-7 day run-in period prior to randomization.

The objective of this pivotal study is to evaluate the relative bioavailability of Synflutide HFA 250/25 Inhaler and SeretideTM 250 EvohalerTM in healthy volunteers with charcoal block.

The objective of this pivotal study is to evaluate the relative bioavailability of Synflutide HFA 250/25 Inhaler and SeretideTM 250 EvohalerTM in healthy volunteers without charcoal block.

The purpose of this study is analyzed the impact of oxygen adjusted during exercise in COPD patients without conventional for LTOT but with exercise desaturation.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether AZD7624 can reduce acute Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) exacerbations in patients on COPD maintenance therapy with a history of frequent acute exacerbations.

The primary objective of this study was to investigate patients acceptability / preference of Berodual® Respimat® inhaler as compared to the conventional Berodual® Metered Aerosol (MA) inhaler. Ease of handling and assembling the Respimat® inhaler at home under real life conditions was also evaluated.