Active clinical trials for "Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive"

The aim of this study to investigate the efficacy of a home-base exercise program with a new conical PEP device on physical performance and health related quality of life in COPD patients.

The purpose of study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Benzalkonium Chloride Solution clearing the oral colonized bacterium in hospitalized patients with COPD.

Introduction In order to guarantee chronic patients and elderly a high quality service from health care organizations in the coming decades, new technologies have been implemented to treat patients from a distance. There is still a need for more studies on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of tele-rehabilitation (TR) and its long-term effects needs also to be determined. To guarantee individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) a high quality service from health care organizations in the coming decades and economically save the national health systems for an expensive bill for the treatment of COPD, new actions plans has to be taken into use. Hereby, more patients can be treated with less human resources while still sustaining or even improving today's services. The importance of such welfare action plans has to maintain a high quality of service that individuals with COPD are willing to accept. Here, TR seems to be a good welfare action plans. Despite proof of improved cost-effectiveness, no studies support the benefits of TR in COPD patient with respect to adherence, security, treatment efficacy and improved quality of life. Aim To assess and compare the feasibility and effect of a tele-rehabilitation program with a new and innovative TR platform (NITRP) compared to standard treatment with respect to exercise capacity, quality of life and activities of daily living in patients with COPD. Method and material The study is a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of tele-rehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation in patients with severe COPD. 54 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be randomized in two groups to either a 8 week tele-rehabilitation program or a conventional COPD rehabilitation program at the hospital. Participants will be tested at baseline, 8 weeks, 3 and 6 months after cessation of the training programs. In the intervention group, a real- and a virtual physiotherapist agent will facilitate the rehabilitation. Ethical considerations This study will not pose any risk to the patient as compared to current practice. Participation is voluntary and the patient may at any time withdraw from the study without consequences for future care or treatment. The questionnaires and the test methods used are clinically recognized instruments. Signed informed consent will be obtained from the all participants after verbal and written information and before the study starts. The study will not be initiated before approval from the Ethics Committee and the Data Protection Agency has been obtained. The study will follow the general research ethical rules as expressed in the Helsinki Declaration II.

This is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial to compare the efficacy of two therapies for patients with AECOPD. 378 subjects will be randomly assigned to one therapies (conventional drug, and the combination of conventional drug and TCM) for 14 days treatment. After the treatment period, subjects in two arms will be followed up for 4 weeks. The primary outcomes will include COPD Assessment Test (CAT), and secondary outcomes include treatment failure rate, treatment success rate, hospitalization time, hospital admission rate, endotracheal intubation rate, mortality and quality of life (COPD-PRO, SF-36).

The goal of this study is to evaluate the utilization and outcomes of AeroEclipse® II Breath Actuated Nebulizer (BAN, Monaghan Medical Corporation, Plattsburgh, NY) vs. standard continuous flow nebulizers (SN). We hypothesize that the use of AeroEclipse® II BAN will reduce the number of nebulizer treatments needed (primary outcome).

Although non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) shows the good curative effect of treating the patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), some patients do not tolerate NPPV or do not benefit from it. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is well tolerated and may be used to patients with AECOPD who are intolerant to NPPV treatment. This study is to evaluate the physiological effect of HFNC and compare it with NPPV.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is characterized by chronic airflow limitation, a qualification of impairment of respiratory muscle function, including hyperinflation and muscle weakness. Thus, pulmonary rehabilitation is indicated for patients and is recommended for even the most severe cases. However some patients do not conclude conventional rehabilitation protocols, due to exercise intolerance, are then an electrical estimation and muscle training respiratory adjuvant treatments for patients. and little has been explored about the effects and methodologies of using transcutaneous electrical diaphragmatic stimulation (TEDS) in healthy subjects. The objective of this study on stage I is to evaluate the acute effect of transcutaneous electrical diaphragmatic stimulation on respiratory muscle strength, cardiac variability, thickness, resistance, mobility and diaphragmatic activation comparing different frequencies of electrical stimulation in healthy individuals. The objective of this study on stage II is to evaluate the effects of transcutaneous electrical diaphragmatic stimulation, compared to inspiratory muscle training on respiratory muscle strength, security of the technics, thickness and diaphragmatic function in healthy individuals.The objective of this study on stage III is to evaluate the effects of transcutaneous electrical diaphragmatic stimulation, compared to IMT on respiratory muscle strength, lung function, thickness and diaphragmatic function in patients with exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital de Clinicas of Porto Alegre (CAEE: 80271517.2.0000.5327).

The SIDERA^B telerehabilitation system is enabled by a multi-domain, multi-device platform providing at home multi-component rehabilitation, targeting cardiovascular (Chronic Heart Failure, CHF), pulmonary (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, COPD) and neurodegenerative (Parkinson Disease, PD) chronic diseases. The rehabilitation program embeds engagement activities for patient and caregiver, to empower appropriation of the SIDERA^B care routines and fuel their well-being resources. The multidisciplinary layering of SIDERA^B is reflected in the validation protocol including a) clinical and well-being evaluation through a cross-over study confronting usual care with the SIDERA^B activities; b) technological evaluation: Health Technology Assessment for organizational, legal and equity impacts; c) economic evaluation: process mapping and budget impact analysis to define a sustainable reimbursement process for the innovative telerehabilitation pathway.

Exercise intolerance is one of the key disabling factors in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although multifactorial, exercise intolerance involves physiological interactions between respiratory and locomotor muscles that may contribute to further reducing exercise tolerance in COPD. The respiratory muscle work during exercise is closely related to breathing and could induce respiratory muscle fatigue in patients with COPD. Respiratory muscle training is an intervention strategy that is sometimes proposed for some patients with COPD, especially whose with inspiratory muscle weakness. It was reported that inspiratory muscle training improves inspiratory muscle endurance and strength, dyspnea and exercise tolerance. There are two types of inspiratory muscle training, inspiratory muscle training against a resistive loading and normocapnic hyperpnoea. The advantage of normocapnic hyperpnoea compared to resistive training is the possibility to simulate the exercise ventilation level while maintaining stable the partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide and end-tidal pressure of carbon dioxide and to solicit the inspiratory and expiratory muscles together, which could increase respiratory muscle tolerance and avoid their fatigue during whole-body exercise. Therefore, the aim of this project is to study the effect of normocapnic hyperpnoea training on exercise tolerance in patients with COPD. We hypothesize that greater improvement in cycling exercise tolerance will be observed following 6-weeks normocapnic hyperpnoea training compared to a sham intervention in patients with COPD.

Objective: is to find out the effect of unsupported upper extremity exercise versus lower extremity exercise on dyspnea and lung function Methodology: Sample and design: 60 patients with Randomized study design will be included in three groups. Duration of intervention: Treatment will continue for 4 weeks. Outcome: Borgs scale and Medical Research Council scale (MRC) for dyspnea will be used to quantify the dyspnea. Lung function tests measure by PEFR, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test (CAT) will be used pre-post. Discussion: We will compare three groups (UPPER EXTREMITY EXCERCISE (UEx), LOWER EXTREMITY EXERCISE (LEx), CONTROL (CON)) with COPD using interventional exercises for upper and lower extremities randomly assigned to three groups on the dyspnea symptoms and quantify and grade them pre-post the intervention. We will also use the CAT questionnaire pre-post to measure the changes in symptoms and functions.