Active clinical trials for "Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive"

The aim is to understand whether activation of receptors involved in clearance of apoptotic cells will improve efferocytosis in COPD patients in vitro and whether generation of pro-inflammatory cytokines can be decreased in COPD patients.

The study's primary aim is to assess whether there is a clinically significant reduction in breathlessness in symptomatic individuals with chronic obstructive respiratory disease (IwCOPD) following engagement with Technology-Assisted Respiratory Adherence prototype 3. The study's secondary aim is to assess whether there is an associated maintenance or increase in activities of daily living to support a positive benefit of Technology-Assisted Respiratory Adherence prototype 3 on breathlessness and whether there is an improvement in the physical activity experience of the patient.

The general practitioner is confronted with unselected smokers whose attempts to quit smoking are often repeated over time before leading to a definitive cessation. Each year, 3-5% of smokers succeed in quitting in the general population. The corollary is that the majority of smokers are in a situation of failure in their attempt to quit: 33% declared during the 2019 French Health Barometer to have made an attempt of at least 7 days in the past year. Thus, this status of "smoker" can cover a wide variety of situations: no attempt to stop smoking, attempt(s) of more or less clinical significance, previous support or not by a health professional, etc. Currently, the HAS recommendations do not determine a specific course of action for these smokers, whose experiences may be very different. It could therefore be interesting to objectivize the smoking cessation process of these patients who have or have not succeeded in quitting, in order to deduce profiles of smokers according to their previous smoking cessation experiences. Furthermore, the choice and relevance of the cessation criteria used are debated. Following the randomized controlled trial DISCO on COPD screening interventions in primary care (3 intervention arms, 1 control arm), the investigators will carry out a pilot cross-sectional survey on the cessation process of smokers during the 2 years following their participation, evaluating the incidence and modalities of cessation attempts of smokers belonging to an age group at risk of COPD (40-80 years) and who initially consulted their general practitioner for any reason 2 years ago at the time of their inclusion. The impact on future management could be the personalization of cessation advice given to smokers according to quantitative and qualitative indicators specific to their experience, their previous history of smoking cessation, their health situation and socio-demographic characteristics. Eventually, a gradation of the levels of support offered to patients in general practice on the basis of predictive factors of smoking cessation could be studied. The investigators hypothesize that participation in COPD screening with the GP may be associated with patient progress in quitting smoking. This pilot study will be conducted on a random sample of 120 participants from the subgroup of 544 patients who were smokers at inclusion in DISCO.

Investigators are building an empirical evidence base for real world data through large-scale replication of randomized controlled trials. The investigators' goal is to understand for what types of clinical questions real world data analyses can be conducted with confidence and how to implement such studies.

Leveraging a natural experiment approach, the investigators will examine rapidly changing telemedicine and in-person models of care during and after the COVID-19 crisis to determine whether certain patients could safely choose to continue telemedicine or telemedicine-supplemented care, rather than return to in-person care.

The aim of this real world study is to assess the safety profile of tiotropium/olodaterol (Tio/Olo).

This study conducted an assessment of the influencing factors and correlations that affect self-management behaviors and resilience in the COPD population.

The primary objective is to assess the relation between involuntary and voluntary assessed quadriceps muscle endurance in patients with COPD. We hypothesized a good correlation (>0.8) between the measurements.

There is increasing evidence showing an association between COPD and cardiovascular disease which is independent from smoking. Recently, it has been shown that FMD of the brachial artery, a surrogate marker of endothelial function, is improving after lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) in patients with severe emphysema. Thus, hyperinflation might be an independent risk factor of atherosclerosis. Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) using endobronchial valves is a minimal-invasive procedure to decrease hyperinflation in patients with severe emphysema. Eventually, successful BLVR with target atelectasis may have the same effect on FMD compared to LVRS, which would underpin the association between hyperinflation and endothelial function. Patients receiving routinely performed BLVR using endobronchial valves due to severe emphysema with hyperinflation are eligible for this study. After obtaining written informed consent, the participating patients will be randomized into an immediate (within 1-2 weeks) BLVR group and a delayed BLVR group (6-8 weeks). Patients in both groups will undergo baseline measurement of primary and secondary endpoints. Immediate BLVR group will be re-assessed 4-6 weeks after successful EBV treatment, whereas the delayed BLVR group will be re-assessed prior EBV treatment. Results of group 1 and 2 will be compared for final analysis.

The PReSent study seeks to clarify the need, develop and test the feasibility and acceptability of a shared decision making intervention to support patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease make decisions about Pulmonary Rehabilitation. The study is split into two parts; (1) an observational study of healthcare professionals implicit attitudes, and (2) a feasibility and acceptability study assessing the value of the newly developed shared decision making intervention including a patient decision aid and decision coaching.